· Public charity
Population Services International
Psi makes it easier for all people to lead healthier lives and plan the families they desire.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 18 grants below total $21,708,519 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $87,332,039 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $65,623,520 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k1 grant · $47k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $1.0M
- $250k+11 grants · $21M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Jhpiego Corporation | $4,577,679 |
| PATH | $4,252,906 |
| FHI 360 | $3,327,609 |
| Management Sciences for Health Inc (MSH) | $1,987,986 |
| CARE International | $1,684,861 |
| International Rescue Committee | $1,273,997 |
| MSI Reproductive Choices | $1,159,113 |
| CONCERN WORLDWIDE US INC | $1,064,946 |
| The Regents of University of California | $619,173 |
| Clinton Health Access Initiative Inc | $385,294 |
| Athena Infonomics LLC | $322,794 |
| Medical Care Development Inc | $224,149 |
| ThinkWell Institute | $203,464 |
| Planet Partnerships LLC | $176,220 |
| Partners in Compassion (PC) | $172,145 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $3.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 9% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $68M on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 4 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: Program Services
Stated purpose: Program Services
Stated purpose: Program Services
Stated purpose: Program Services
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
39 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 24 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.0M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- P(PATH (PEOPLE ACTING TO HELP) INC8× · 2017–2024 · $13M · revenue +38%
- FHFamily Health International Inc4× · 2021–2024 · $8.1M · revenue +5%
- IRInternational Rescue Committee INC4× · 2021–2024 · $4.9M · revenue +38%
Funded once
- MCMALARIA CONSORTIUM US INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $1.6M · revenue +85%
- FPFONDATION POUR LA SANTE REPRODUCTRICE ET LEDUCATIONgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $556k · revenue +28%
- EGELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATIONone grant, 2017 · $527k · revenue -23%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.
Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…
See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.
To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…
To develop hiv prevention products and other sexual and reproductive health technologies for women, and to make them available and accessible where they are urgently needed.
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
Women in global health (wgh) is a global movement and organization that brings together all genders and backgrounds to achieve gender equality in global health leadership.
To save lives and protect people's health by increasing equitable and sustainable use of vaccines.
Pai advances evidence, policies and programs to enable women, youth and at-risk communities to access sexual and reproductive health as core to health equity, climate resilience, economic well-being and gender equality.
Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…
Ibp works with civil society, governments, international institutions and the private sector to bring about a world in which empowered citizens participate in open, inclusive public budgeting processes to shape policies and practices that…
Engenderhealth envisions a gender-equal world where all people have the agency, resources, and opportunities to live healthy lives.(see schedule o)
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Health International Inc and the most unlike its peers is Foundation for Professional Development. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JHPIEGO CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds MANAGEMENT SCIENCES FOR HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds Medical Care Development Inc ↗
- Who funds PATH (PEOPLE ACTING TO HELP) INC ↗
- Who funds Family Health International Inc ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds IDEOORG ↗
- Who funds PLAN INTERNATIONAL USA INC ↗
- Who funds DEVWORKS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds MSI US ↗
- Who funds CONCERN WORLDWIDE (US) INC ↗
- Who funds CLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
- Who funds MALARIA CONSORTIUM US INC ↗
- Who funds PACT INC ↗
- Who funds POPULATION MEDIA CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds WHITE RIBBON ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds RESULTS FOR DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds INTRAHEALTH INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds FONDATION POUR LA SANTE REPRODUCTRICE ET LEDUCATION ↗
- Who funds ELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HEALTH SYSTEMS INSIGHT ↗
- Who funds HEALTH THROUGH WALLS INC ↗
- Who funds AVENIR HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION WESTERN HEMISPHERE REGION ↗
- Who funds ACCESS HEALTH INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
- Who funds THE POPULATION COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds BRAC USA INC ↗
- Who funds CICATELLI ASSOCIATES INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Gates Foundation · Family Health International Inc · Johns Hopkins University · Path · Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · Jhpiego Corporation · Conrad N Hilton Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · The Rockefeller Foundation · The Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation · Georgetown University
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Population Services International funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Management Sciences for Health Inc — 67% of income from government
- Jhpiego Corporation — 65% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Health Through Walls Inc — 19% of income from government
- Avenir Health Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.