How much did PARTNERS FOR HEALTH INC grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 44% of PARTNERS FOR HEALTH INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

hunger preventionphysical activityjusticevictims survivorssurvivors domesticdomestic violencedisease prevention

2019

capitalsocial determinantsaccess affordablehealthy backbonecarehealthy foodfood access

2020

professionalaccess affordabletraininghealthy foodfood accessaffordable housingcare

2021

dentalpackleaguestrengthensexualadvocacychildren

2022

programmingagesaccess buildingavailableartpackcorporation

2023

produce purchasingnursing awardjournallaraja nursingpart-timemyrtle forsythfarm

2024

food securityaccess healthcarehousing homelessnessnursing awardlaraja nursingmyrtle phillipsphillips forsyth

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 64 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k31 grants · $84k
$10k–50k17 grants · $426k
$50k–250k16 grants · $1.2M

$14,600

Median grant

States reached

$45M

Total assets

Largest grants

HUMAN NEEDS FOOD PANTRY$126,000
KINDERSMILE FOUNDATION INC$100,000
TONI'S KITCHEN$92,090
MONTCLAIR AMBULANCE UNIT$80,000
FAMILY PROMISE OF ESSEX COUNTY INC$76,000
INDEPENDENT COLLEGE FUND OF NEW JERSEY$75,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$70,400
MONTCLAIR NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORP$68,000
ARCHDIOCESE OF NEWARK$66,579
CITY GREEN INC$65,500
NEW JERSEY CONSORTIUM FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDREN$60,000
NUTLEY FAMILY SERVICE BUREAU$60,000
CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION$60,000
ST PETER'S HAVEN$51,200
MONTCLAIR PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION$50,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 7%. 99% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$10M · 68 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +72% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.

68 repeat relationships — 36 still active in FY2024, 32 since wound down; 28 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$10M

$755k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%

+10%

Still filing today

63%

40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $296k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthPhilanthropyEducationHousing & ShelterEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

HN
HUMAN NEEDS FOOD PARTY
8× · 2017–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +52%
CG
CITY GREEN INC
8× · 2017–2024 · $823k · revenue +212%
IC
INDEPENDENT COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES OF NEW JERSEY
8× · 2017–2024 · $535k · revenue +15%

Funded once

BC
BLOOMFIELD COLLEGE
one grant, 2017 · $150k · revenue -14%
CF
COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF NEW JERSEYgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $120k · revenue +140%
MI
MESH INC
one grant, 2022 · $40k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Newark Community Health Centers Inc

The mission of newark community health centers is to provide affordable, high quality, and accessible healthcare to the communities that we serve. as one of the largest providers of comprehensive primary care services for uninsured and…

Health

Metropolitan Family Health Network

Metropolitan family health network, inc operates a healthcare center in jersey city, new jersey to provide a broad range of health services to a largely underserved population.

Health

New Jersey Citizen Action

To protect and expand the rights of citizens of the state of new jersey, and to encourage active citizen involvement in campaigns promoting economic, social and racial equity.

—

Mental Health Association

To support the goals and programs of the mental health association of monmouth county, inc.

Health

New Jersey Coalition Against Sexual Assault

The New Jersey Coalition Against Sexual Assault (NJCASA) is driven by a mission to support all survivors of sexual violence, their loved ones, and the service providers who support them.

—

The Jewish Federation of Middlesex &

Central coordinating agency for the jewish community in middlesex & monmouth counties, nj.

Philanthropy

The New Jersey Institute for Social

A state-wide research and advocacy organization dedicated to the advancement of urban areas and residents.

Human Services

Mental Health Association of Monmouth

Mha of mc is dedicated to promoting mental health and wellness, the prevention of mental illness and the improved care and treatment of persons affected by mental illness.

—

Montclair Historical Society

The montclair history center offers guided and self-guided museum tours toindividuals, schools, and organizations. staff, trustees, and volunteers research and write articles for local media and present programs about local history…

Arts & Culture

New Jersey Mental Health Institute Inc

The new jersey mental health institute, inc. aims to promote quality mental health and substance use services through training, technical assistance, research and policy development.

Health

Council of New Jersey Grantmakers Inc

Cnjg supports and elevates new jersey's philanthropic community through shared learning, collaborative and trusting relationships, networking building, and leadership.

Philanthropy

Jewish Family Service & Children's

Jewish family service and children's center of clifton-passaic is a social services and mental health agency that seeks to enhance the lives of indiviuals and families. the organization offers psychotherapy, psychiatry, geriatric, crisis…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Jersey Association for Mental Health and the most unlike its peers is Clara Maass Medical Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/90

the rest of the field

10%

3,081/30,301

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

72 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

67/72

Grantees still filing

52/72

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$5,351,536Human Services$2,631,122Environment$995,792Health$774,070Housing & Shelter$624,041Philanthropy$438,827Education$243,817

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of New JerseyNJ58.3× affinity39 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of New Jersey · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Schumann Fund for New Jersey Inc · The Healthcare Foundation of New Jersey · Investors Foundation Inc · Turrell Fund · The Provident Bank Foundation · Columbia Bank Foundation · Pseg Foundation Inc · Sonder Foundation · The Silver Family Foundation Inc · Community Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation PARTNERS FOR HEALTH INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

36get no government money at all

3rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: A LOT TO GROW INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

high risk

2 years of Form 990 filings, no recent filing.

Legal standing

medium risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 454952298 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on A LOT TO GROW INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
FlagSustained operations— No recent filing on record.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 67% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Partners for Health Inc?

Find your warmest path to Partners for Health Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

PARTNERS FOR HEALTH INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

72 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Partners for Health Inc?

More from the funding graph

PARTNERS FOR HEALTH INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

72 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Partners for Health Inc?

More from the funding graph