· Private foundation
Otter Island Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k77 grants · $109k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $73k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CONNECTICUT COLLEGE | $27,000 |
| ISLAND INSTITUTE | $13,500 |
| FRIENDS OF THE STRAND THEATRE | $12,000 |
| POE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PARENT TEACHER ORGANIZATION | $10,000 |
| FARNSWORTH ART MUSEUM | $10,000 |
| PENOBSCOT BAY YMCA | $6,000 |
| NORTH BRIDGE ACADEMY | $5,000 |
| SAN FRANCISCO DAY SCHOOL | $5,000 |
| ROCKWOOD COMMUNITY CHURCH | $5,000 |
| CURE ALZHEIMER'S FUND | $3,500 |
| DUKE UNIVERSITY | $3,500 |
| COLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION | $3,500 |
| UNITED MIDCOAST CHARITIES | $3,000 |
| ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA | $3,000 |
| HERMANN PARK CONSERVANCY | $3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $46k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.
145 repeat relationships — 69 still active in FY2024, 76 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TWTHE WILLIAM A FARNSWORTH LIBRARY AND ART MUSEUM INC7× · 2017–2024 · $129k · revenue +62%
- CMCHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC8× · 2017–2024 · $66k · revenue +89%
NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES3× · 2017–2019 · $55k · revenue +133%
Funded once
- DMDEYOUNGLEGION MUSEUMone grant, 2018 · $6k
- FAFINE ARTS MUSEUM OF SAN FRANCISCOone grant, 2018 · $5k
- DCDEPELCHIN CHILDREN'S CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +30%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…
Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service
To enrich life through discovery, education, and the conservation of plants and the natural environment.
The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)
Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.
The mission of rhode island school of design, through its college and museum,is to educate its students and the public in the creation and (see schedule o)appreciation of works of art and design, to discover and transmit knowledge and to…
The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Colorado Gives Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The National World War Ii Museum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
151 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 151 of the 208 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE WILLIAM A FARNSWORTH LIBRARY AND ART MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds Island Institute ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES ↗
- Who funds CONNECTICUT COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE STRAND THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds ROCKPORT LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Poe Elementary School PTO ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds ALLEY THEATRE ↗
- Who funds EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds UNITED MIDCOAST CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds GROTON SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds PENOBSCOT BAY YMCA ↗
- Who funds Hermann Park Conservancy ↗
- Who funds VOTEORG ↗
- Who funds ST GEORGE'S SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds GREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
- Who funds GLIDE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEW ENGLAND HISTORIC GENEALOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds POMFRET SCHOOL INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds CAMDEN CONFERENCE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Maine Community Foundation Inc · Fisher Charitable Foundation · Tr Ua the Camden Foundation · Middlecott Foundation · Davis Family Foundation · The Bertuzzi Family Foundation · Community Foundation Boulder County · Onion Foundation · Albert & Ethel Herzstein Charitable Foundation · Angel Foundation · Morton-Kelly Charitable Trust · Strake Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Otter Island Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
- Society for the Preservation of New Engl — 2% of income from government
- The Trustees of the Smith College — 1% of income from government
- Connecticut College — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.