Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

O'Kelley - Hemminghaus Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$282k
Granted FY2024still arriving
26
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$1.2MHealth$663kReligion$260kArts & Culture$234kPhilanthropy$130kYouth Development$89kHuman Services$40kRecreation & Sports$30kOther$0
02FY2024 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k16 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $108k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$4,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY HEALTH DEVELOPMENT INC$100,000
ROY MAAS YOUTH ALTERNATIVES$50,000
REAL COUNTY JUNIOR LIVESTOCK SHOW A$20,000
ST JOHN LUTHERAN CHURCH$20,000
UNITED WAY$15,000
MT CALVERY LUTHERAN CHURCH$13,000
KENDALL COUNTY WOMEN'S SHELTER$10,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$10,000
WOUNDED WARRIORS PROJECT$10,000
GUNNISON VALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION$10,000
ELIJAH RISING$5,000
LEAKEY ISD$4,500
THE SIGNATRY$4,000
TRIPLE H EQUITHERAPY CENTER$2,000
UNIVERSITY OF WEST FLORIDA FOUNDATI$1,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $37k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 46% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%ELIJAH RISING: $5k → 16%WOUNDED WARRIORS PROJECT: $10k → 14%HIGH SOCKS FOR HOPE: $1k → 17%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%KENDALL COUNTY WOMEN'S SHELTER: $10k → 7%KENDALL COUNTY WOMEN'S SHELTER: $10k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
NV
CO
MO
NM
KS
DC
AL
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.3M · 29 repeat orgs$628k to everyone else

29 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
31

Total granted

$2.3M
$429k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+36%

Still filing today

52%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 30% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $198k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthHuman ServicesReligionInternationalArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TG
    THE GENEVA SCHOOL OF BOERNE
    2× · 2017–2021 · $695k · revenue +49%
  • TL
    TEXAS LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2017–2023 · $160k · revenue +16%
  • GV
    GUNNISON VALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $32k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • MC
    MAYS CANCER CENTER
    one grant, 2019 · $250k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA
    one grant, 2021 · $30k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $30k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Uatx

Uatx is a nonprofit dedicated to building a liberal arts university committed to freedom of inquiry, freedom of conscience, and civil discourse. to maintain these principles, the university will be fiercely independent financially,…

Education
2
Hospice of South Texas Inc

Hospice care of terminally ill patients

3
Covenant Hospital Hobbs

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

Health
4
Howard Payne University

Howard payne university is a christ-centered academic community dedicated to excellence by developing and equipping the whole person for intellectual inquiry, personal and professional integrity, and service to god and humanity.

Education
5
Greater Austin Christian Foundation

Mobilizing resources by inspiring biblical generosity in the greater austin, texas area.

Religion
6
The Association of Former Students of Texas a&M University

To strengthen the association of former students, promote the interests and welfare of texas a&m university, perpetuate ties of affection and esteem formed in university or college days, and serve the student body.

Education
7
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

8
Presbyterian Medical Services

Presbyterian medical services designs and delivers quality, integrated health, education, and human services in response to identified community needs of the multicultural people of the southwest.

Health
9
Houston Christian University

The mission of houston christian university is to provide a learning experience that instills in students a passion for academic, spiritual, and professional excellence as a result of our central confession, "jesus christ is lord."

10
Faith Presbyterian Providers Inc

To provide hospice and physician services to residents in the dallas metroplex and training to physicians and other care givers on providing these services. faith presbyterian providers is currently dormant.

11
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
12
Texas Tribune Inc

The texas tribune promotes civic engagement and public education across the state by producing and sharing for free public data interactives, statewide events and intensive and daily reporting on texas public policy, politics and current…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas Public Policy Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Frio Canyon Ems Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHealth Access Advocacy and …United Way AffiliatesDomestic Violence ServicesCancer Support ServicesEquine Therapy ProgramsOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Community FoundationsIndependent K-12 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%2%<5yr16%7%5–10yr20%12%10–20yr16%33%20–35yr10%26%35–55yr13%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%1%<5yr16%1%5–10yr20%4%10–20yr16%59%20–35yr10%25%35–55yr13%11%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/46
the rest of the field
15%
20,233/136,758

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/40
Grantees still filing
26/40
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE — $259,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCEMAYS CANCER CENTER — $250,000 · OtherMAYS CANCER CENTERUTSA — $202,000 · OtherUTSAUNIVERSITY OF WEST FLORIDA — $200,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WEST FLORIDATEXAS LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY — $160,445 · OtherTEXAS LUTHERAN UNIVERSITYST JOHN LUTHERAN CHURCH — $153,600 · OtherST JOHN LUTHERAN CHURCHTHE UNITED WAY INC — $127,500 · OtherTHE UNITED WAY INCIndividual grant recipient — $105,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAUBURN UNIVERSITY — $103,000 · Other+42 more — $399,047 · Other+42 moreTHE GENEVA SCHOOL OF BOERNE — $695,000 · EducationTHE GENEVA SCHOOL OF BOERNE+6 more — $24,600 · EducationCOMMUNITY HEALTH DEVELOPMENT INC — $100,000 · HealthGUNNISON VALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION — $32,000 · HealthTYLER ROBINSON FOUNDATION — $10,000 · HealthFORM COMMUNITIES INC — $8,000 · Health+3 more — $5,000 · HealthKENDALL COUNTY WOMEN'S SHELTER — $20,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $11,000 · Human ServicesElijah Rising — $5,000 · Human Services+1 more — $1,000 · Human ServicesPONDER MINISTRIES — $5,000 · ReligionThe Signatry Corporation Inc — $1,000 · ReligionCHRISTIAN OUTDOOR ALLIANCE INC — $1,000 · ReligionFRIENDS OF CIBOLO WILDERNESS — $3,400 · EnvironmentBLUEPRINT MINISTRIES INC — $2,500 · Youth Development
Other$1,959,592Education$719,600Health$155,000Human Services$37,000Religion$7,000Environment$3,400Youth Development$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE GENEVA SCHOOL OF BOERNE — $695,000 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetTEXAS LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY — $160,445 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTHE UNITED WAY INC — $127,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH DEVELOPMENT INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetROY MAAS' YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGUNNISON VALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION — $32,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetKENDALL COUNTY WOMEN'S SHELTER — $20,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTYLER ROBINSON FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPROJECT HOPE OF GUNNISON VALLEY — $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetFORM COMMUNITIES INC — $8,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetElijah Rising — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ALAMO AREA COUNCIL — $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC — $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTriple H Equitherapy Center — $3,400 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF CIBOLO WILDERNESS — $3,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWHITBY ROAD ALLIANCE INC DBA PROVIDENCE PLACE — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLUEPRINT MINISTRIES INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHORAL SOCIETY OF PENSACOLA — $1,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTH TEXAS INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WEST FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN OUTDOOR ALLIANCE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHigh Socks for Hope Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOUR LADY OF THE LAKE UNIVERSITY OF SAN ANTONIO — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPENSACOLA OPERA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHILL COUNTRY DAILY BREAD — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHaven for Hope of Bexar County — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREBECCA'S WISH — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION — $675 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIO CANYON EMS INC — $600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBread For The World Inc — $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE LIBRARY ASSOCIATION — $250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLeakey Volunteer Fire Department Inc — $200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPHILMONT STAFF ASSOCIATION INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUBURN ALUMNI ASSOCIATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE GENEVA SCHOOL OF BOERNE
  • Who funds TEXAS LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds THE UNITED WAY INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH DEVELOPMENT INC
  • Who funds ROY MAAS' YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC
  • Who funds GUNNISON VALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds KENDALL COUNTY WOMEN'S SHELTER
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
  • Who funds TYLER ROBINSON FOUNDATION
  • Who funds AMBLESIDE SCHOOL OF BOERNE
  • Who funds PROJECT HOPE OF GUNNISON VALLEY
  • Who funds FORM COMMUNITIES INC
  • Who funds Elijah Rising
  • Who funds PONDER MINISTRIES
  • Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ALAMO AREA COUNCIL
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

San Antonio Area FoundationTX26.6× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: San Antonio Area Foundation · Pryor Myra Stafford Char Tr F0030100 · Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable Foundation · San Antonio Food Bank · Methodist Healthcare Ministries of South Texas Inc · Cb and Anita Branch Trust James L Drought Trustee · H E Butt Foundation · Perry & Ruby Stevens Charitable Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Harvey E Najim Charitable Foundation · United Way of San Antonio and Bexar County · John R & Greli N Less Charitable Trust #FE324

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization O'Kelley - Hemminghaus Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to O'Kelley - Hemminghaus Foundation?

Find your warmest path to O'Kelley - Hemminghaus Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 74 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph