· Private foundation
John R & Greli N Less Charitable Trust #FE324
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 42% of John R & Greli N Less Charitable Trust #FE324’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k10 grants · $207k
- $50k–250k50 grants · $5.2M
- $250k+4 grants · $1.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OUR LADY OF THE LAKE UNIVERSITY | $500,000 |
| YOUTH ORCHESTRAS OF SAN ANTONIO | $300,000 |
| SAN ANTONIO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY | $250,000 |
| GIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHWEST TEXAS | $250,000 |
| ROY MAAS YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC | $200,000 |
| THE CHILDRENS SHELTER | $200,000 |
| Santa Rosa Childrens Hospital | $200,000 |
| St Peter Upon the Water | $200,000 |
| HAVEN FOR HOPE | $150,000 |
| MCNAY ART MUSEUM | $150,000 |
| HEMISFAIR CONSERVANCY | $150,000 |
| TOBIN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS | $150,000 |
| San Antonio Food Bank | $150,000 |
| Clarity Child Guidance Center | $125,000 |
| American Cancer Society | $125,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $1.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +17% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
39 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 33 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.8M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCCHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION4× · 2021–2024 · $800k · revenue +14%
- TBTEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE3× · 2021–2023 · $600k · revenue +3%
- HCHEMISFAIR CONSERVANCY3× · 2022–2024 · $550k · revenue +59%
Funded once
- CCCibolo Center for Nature Conservationone grant, 2023 · $300k
- HCHILL COUNTRY DAILY BREADone grant, 2023 · $271k · revenue -2%
- TPTEXAS PUBLIC RADIOone grant, 2022 · $260k · revenue +20%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
San antonio foster care and adoption services inc. is a licensed child placement agency in the state of texas. the organization cares for children placed in foster care by the state of texas.
Publishing a local online news source. We believe a well informed and connected community is essential to making San Antonio a better place to live, work and play.
The mission of sa talent, inc. is to educate and develop youth and adults into the talent needs of san antonio's current and future employers and provide services for the regional employers for the retention and growth of their local…
To foster human and community development through community-based arts.
The mission of the san antonio hispanic chamber of commerce is to advocate in building a better san antonio through the growth and prosperity of hispanic, small minority, women-owned businesses, and hispanic professional and trade…
The mission of the san antonio medical foundation is to improvehealth care, advance biomedical science, and enhance communitywell-being by providing leadership & active stewardship of our landand other assets.
The mission of greater:satx is to lead the developemnt and diversification of san antonio regional economy through the recruitment and expansion of qualify employers and job producing investments.
To provide alcohol and drug use prevention, intervention and recovery services to children, youth and adults in the community.
Develop and promote the lifetime sport
To surround students with a community of support, empowering them to stay in school and achieve in life.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Childrens Bereavement Center of South Texas and the most unlike its peers is Sa Life Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
68 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 68 of the 93 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds CHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OUR LADY OF THE LAKE UNIVERSITY OF SAN ANTONIO ↗
- Who funds TEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds HEMISFAIR CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS SAN ANTONIO ↗
- Who funds Witte Museum ↗
- Who funds Haven for Hope of Bexar County ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds ROY MAAS' YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC ↗
- Who funds Kinetic Kids Inc ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds YOUTH ORCHESTRAS OF SAN ANTONIO ↗
- Who funds SOUTH TEXAS BLOOD & TISSUE CENTER ↗
- Who funds MCNAY ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds HILL COUNTRY DAILY BREAD ↗
- Who funds TEXAS PUBLIC RADIO ↗
- Who funds CLARITY CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHWEST TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds BRIGHTON CENTER ↗
- Who funds Christian Assistance Ministry ↗
- Who funds Family Service Association of San Antonio Inc ↗
- Who funds GUARDIAN HOUSE ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds I CARE SAN ANTONIO INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S SHELTER ↗
- Who funds THE SARAH ROBERTS FRENCH HOME ↗
- Who funds BOYSVILLE INC ↗
- Who funds TEAMABILITY INC ↗
- Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ALAMO AREA COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds BEXAR COUNTY PERFORMING ARTS CENTER FDN TOBIN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ART ↗
- Who funds THE ARC OF SAN ANTONIO INC ↗
- Who funds SA CHRISTIAN HOPE RESOURCE CNTR INC DBA SA HOPE CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable Foundation · San Antonio Area Foundation · Pryor Myra Stafford Char Tr F0030100 · Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation · Elizabeth Huth Coates Charitable Foundation of 1992 · Harvey E Najim Charitable Foundation · The Texas Cavaliers Charitable Foundation · Betty Stieren Kelso Foundation · United Way of San Antonio and Bexar County · Marcia & Otto Koehler Foundation · St Luke's Lutheran Health Ministries Inc · Keith M Orme and Pat Vigeon Orme Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization John R & Greli N Less Charitable Trust #FE324 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to John R & Greli N Less Charitable Trust #FE324?
Find your warmest path to John R & Greli N Less Charitable Trust #FE324 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.