· Public charity
North Star Fund Inc
North star fund is a non-profit organization dedicated to supporting community organizing in new york.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 144 grants below total $4,332,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $10,696,690 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $6,364,690 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k10 grants · $75k
- $10k–50k118 grants · $2.4M
- $50k–250k15 grants · $900k
- $250k+1 grant · $1.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST | $1,000,000 |
| COMMON DEFENSE EDUCATION FUND | $60,000 |
| EAST HARLEM EL BARRIO COMMUNITY LAND TRUST | $60,000 |
| SYLVIA RIVERA LAW PROJECT | $60,000 |
| MEKONG NYC | $60,000 |
| COMMUNITY AID & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION | $60,000 |
| HOOPS4KIDS | $60,000 |
| SOCIAL JUSTICE CENTER OF ALBANY | $60,000 |
| CASA COMMUNITY ACTION FOR SAFE APARTMENTS NEW SETTLEMENT | $60,000 |
| CARROLL GARDENS ASSOCIATION | $60,000 |
| COOPER SQUARE COMMITTEE | $60,000 |
| GLLTS | $60,000 |
| LA COLMENA | $60,000 |
| ALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS | $60,000 |
| GUARDIANS OF FLUSHING BAY | $60,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $2.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
126 repeat relationships — 83 still active in FY2025, 43 since wound down; 36 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $690k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
PAROLE PREPARATION PROJECT INC2× · 2023–2024 · $260k · revenue +44%- WFWESPAC FOUNDATION INC3× · 2023–2025 · $230k · revenue +68%
- CFCENTER FOR TRANSFORMATIVE ACTION2× · 2023–2024 · $230k · revenue +4%
Funded once
- CFCommunity Food Advocates Incone grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue -44%
- RARIDERS ALLIANCE FUND INCone grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue +21%
- FIFORESTDALE INCone grant, 2024 · $46k · revenue +5%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
CAAAV Voice is a grassroot organization aiming to empower Asian immigrant communities by organizing against gentrification, tenant rights and promote social justice.
programs in NYC pertaining to Workers Rights and workplaces by building power for working people
Jews For Racial & Economic Justice Action (JFREJ Action or JFREJ) is the home for Jewish New Yorkers organizing with our neighbors and allies to transform New York from a playground for the wealthy few into a real democracy for all of us.…
We join our clients in the struggle to organize, assert their rights and protect their homes. we work to ensure that community voices are centered in the decisions that impact their lives and neighborhoods.
The organization is based in the south bronx and serves immigrants and communities of color by building, growing, and sustaining worker-owned green businesses to create a strong, local, and democratic economy rooted in racial and gender…
The NYC Network of Worker Cooperatives is dedicated to sharing and cultivating the educational, financial, and technical resources of its members and supporting the growth of worker cooperatives for social and economic justice. We offer…
To transform our collective capacity to navigate complex legal systems and support safe, thriving, and engaged immigrant communities.
Wecnyc builds unity and power among communities of diverse immigrant women through education, collective support, direct services and practicing civic engagement.
A grassroots membership-based organization building power for low and moderate-income communities in new york state.
TheNorthern Manhattan Coalition for Immigrant Rights (NMCIR), is a non-profit organization, founded in 1982 to educate, defend and protect the rights of immigrants. Recognized by the Board of Immigration Appeals, NMCIR is committed to…
Fuerza Laboral is a workers' rights center whose mission is to shift the balance of power in our economy in favor of workers by educating, training, and organizing workers to become community leaders; taking direct action to recover unpaid…
We are workers, united across different industries to improve our working conditions and our lives. We come together as working people to build power through education, organizing, and enforcement. We work to raise and uphold standards in…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Voices of Community Activists & Leaders (Vocal-Ny) Inc and the most unlike its peers is First Central Economic Development Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 14 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 14% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
176 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 176 of the 192 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
- Who funds Make the Road New York ↗
- Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL JUSTICE CENTER OF ALBANY INC ↗
- Who funds FUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds PAROLE PREPARATION PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds WESPAC FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR TRANSFORMATIVE ACTION ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC POLICY AND EDUCATION FUND OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds NEWBURGH LGBTQIA CENTER ↗
- Who funds INTERRELIGIOUS FOUNDATION FOR COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds Mekong Inc ↗
- Who funds Hudson Catskill Housing Coalition ↗
- Who funds VOICES OF COMMUNITY ACTIVISTS & LEADERS (VOCAL-NY) INC ↗
- Who funds URBAN JUSTICE CENTER ↗
- Who funds CARROLL GARDENS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Community Aid and Development Corp ↗
- Who funds Rise Up Kingston NY Inc ↗
- Who funds COLUMBIA COUNTY SANCTUARY MOVEMENT INC ↗
- Who funds GIRL VOW INC ↗
- Who funds FLUSHING WORKERS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Justice Committee Inc ↗
- Who funds URBAN HOMESTEADING ASSISTANCE (U-HAB) INC ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN COMMUNITIES TOGETHER INC ↗
- Who funds FAITH IN NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds FAMILIES FOR FREEDOM INC ↗
- Who funds Alliance for Global Justice Corp ↗
- Who funds Alliance of Families for Justice Inc ↗
- Who funds Womens Community Justice Association Inc ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL RELIGIOUS CAMPAIGN AGAINST TORTURE ↗
- Who funds EAST NEW YORK CLT INC ↗
- Who funds ALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC ↗
- Who funds LA COLMENA NYC INC DBA LA COLMENA F/K/A STATEN ISLAND COMMUNITY JOB CENTER ↗
- Who funds EAST HARLEM EL BARRIO COMMUNITY LAN ↗
- Who funds FJC ↗
- Who funds Cooper Square Community Development Committee Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: New York Foundation · New York Women's Foundation Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Brooklyn Community Foundation · Robin Hood Foundation · Borealis Philanthropy · Proteus Fund Inc · The New York Community Trust · New York Immigration Coalition Inc · The Sparkplug Foundation · The Scherman Foundation Inc · NEO Philanthropy Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization North Star Fund Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Third Sector New England Inc — 3% of income from government
- Resist Inc — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.