Skip to content
North Carolina Coalition to End Hom at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

North Carolina Coalition to End Hom

To end homelessness by creating alliances, encouraging public dialogue, securing resources and advocating for systemic change.

$881k
Granted FY2023
14
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$190k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2023.

Housing & Shelter$3.6MHealth$146kHuman Services$77k
02FY2023 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $179k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $692k
$41,022
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOMEWARD BOUND OF WESTERN NC$190,322
HOUSING COLLABORATIVE$163,800
SIXTH AVENUE PSYCHIATRIC REHABILIAT$146,475
JOHNSTON-LEE-HARNETT COMMUNITY ACTI$72,973
GREATER HICKORY COOPERATIVE CHRISTI$61,636
TRILLIUM HEALTH RESOURCES$56,739
WILSON COUNTY INTERFAITH SERVICES$41,022
DIAKONOS INC$28,726
THE REACH CENTER$26,278
Individual grant recipient$22,674
COMMUNITY LINK$21,882
CENTRAL PIEDMON COMMUNITY ACTION$19,999
HERE IN JACKSON COUNTY INC$18,214
PARTNERS BEHAVIORAL HEALTH$7,803
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $130k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%DIAKONOS: $23k → 9%FAMILY ABUSE SVCS OF ALAMANCE CO: $58k → 13%THE REACH CENTER: $24k → 15%THE REACH CENTER: $6k → 15%FAMILY ABUSE SVCS OF ALAMANCE CO: $19k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.5M · 15 repeat orgs$305k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
4

Total granted

$3.5M
$87k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+24%

Still filing today

87%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $218k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
Housing & ShelterHuman ServicesHealthReligionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HB
    HOMEWARD BOUND OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $361k · revenue +56%
  • SA
    SIXTH AVENUE PSYCHIATRIC REHABILITATION PARTNERS INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $342k · revenue +140%
  • HOUSING FOR NEW HOPE
    3× · 2020–2022 · $322k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • NS
    NC STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $29k
  • RC
    ROBESON COUNTY COMMITTEE ON DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
    one grant, 2019 · $27k · revenue +24%
  • FA
    FAMILY ABUSE SERVICE OF ALAMANCE COUNTY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -28%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cleveland County Abuse Prevention Council Inc

The Abuse Prevention Council provides emergency, advocacy, counseling, education and specialized services for victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, and homeless individuals and families.

Crime & Legal
2
Shelter House Community Shelter and Transition Services

Through shelter and housing, advocacy and supportive services, our mission is to prevent and end homelessness in our community.

—
3
Hubbard House Inc

Safety, empowerment, and social change for victims of domestic violence and their families. to that end we offer a full compendium of services for victims of domestic violence.

Human Services
4
Safe Harbour Inc

Safe harbour provides a continuum of housing and supportive services for homeless and nearly homeless individuals and families in our communities.

Housing & Shelter
5
Hospitality House of Northwest North Carolina

To provide food and shelter for the homeless

Housing & Shelter
6
Partners Ending Homelessness

Partners ending homelessness encourages public understanding of the causes and conditions of homelessness and leads a strong and stable system of care for individuals and families to reduce homelessness in guilford county.

Human Services
7
Homes of Hope Inc

Provied temporary and emergency and low income housing and secured shelter.

Housing & Shelter
8
Human Services Programs of Carroll County Inc

Hsp gives hope, inspires change, and provides opportunity by mobilizing the community in the fight against poverty.

Housing & Shelter
9
Housing Initiative Partnership Inc

Housing initiative partnership, inc. (hip) develops innovative affordable housing, revitalizes neighborhoods and equips people to achieve their housing and financial goals. hip's vision is that every person lives in high-quality affordable…

Housing & Shelter
10
Family Housing Network of Fort Collins Inc

Faith Family Hospitality's mission is to support families experiencing homelessness to achieve sustainable self-sufficiency in a timely and dignified manner. This interfaith volunteer effort coordinates the work of 30 diverse Fort Collins…

Human Services
11
The San Francisco Particular Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.

Human Services
12
Peace At Home Advocacy Center Inc

We are dedicated to a community free from family violence, sexual assault, stalking and/or human trafficking through empowerment, support and education.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Homeward Bound of Western North Carolina Inc; the most unlike its peers is Domestic Abuse Intervention Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
9/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRILLIUM HEALTH RESOURCES: $676,252 · OtherTRILLIUM HEALTH RESOURCESJOHNSTON-LEE-HARNETT COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $283,613 · OtherJOHNSTON-LEE-HARNETT COMMUNITY ACTION INCCommunity Link Programs of Travelers Aid Society of Central Carolinas Inc: $208,679 · OtherCommunity Link Programs of Travelers Aid Society of …Wilson County Interfaith Services Inc: $195,279 · OtherWilson County Interfaith Services IncHOMEWARD BOUND OF WESTERN NC: $190,322 · OtherHOMEWARD BOUND OF WESTERN NCIndividual grant recipient: $103,813 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+6 more: $114,989 · Other+6 moreHousing Collaborative: $494,475 · Housing & ShelterHousing CollaborativeHOMEWARD BOUND OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC: $360,637 · Housing & ShelterHOMEWARD BOUND OF WESTERN NORTH CAR…HOUSING FOR NEW HOPE: $321,796 · Housing & ShelterHOUSING FOR NEW HOPESIXTH AVENUE PSYCHIATRIC REHABILITATION PARTNERS INC: $341,754 · HealthSIXTH AVENUE P…GREATER HICKORY COOPERATIVE CHRISTIAN MINISTRY: $154,593 · HealthGREATER HICKOR…DOMESTIC ABUSE INTERVENTION SERVICES INC: $76,934 · Human ServicesDIAKONOS INC: $73,671 · Human ServicesTHE REACH CENTER: $56,280 · Human ServicesFIRST FRUIT MINISTRIES: $131,074 · ReligionHERE in Jackson County Inc: $24,160 · Philanthropy
Other$1,772,947Housing & Shelter$1,176,908Health$496,347Human Services$206,885Religion$131,074Philanthropy$24,160

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHousing Collaborative: $494,475 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetHOMEWARD BOUND OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC: $360,637 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetSIXTH AVENUE PSYCHIATRIC REHABILITATION PARTNERS INC: $341,754 over 5y, 7.6% of budgetHOUSING FOR NEW HOPE: $321,796 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetJOHNSTON-LEE-HARNETT COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $283,613 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetCommunity Link Programs of Travelers Aid Society of Central Carolinas Inc: $208,679 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetWilson County Interfaith Services Inc: $195,279 over 5y, 5.3% of budgetGREATER HICKORY COOPERATIVE CHRISTIAN MINISTRY: $154,593 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetFIRST FRUIT MINISTRIES: $131,074 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetDOMESTIC ABUSE INTERVENTION SERVICES INC: $76,934 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetDIAKONOS INC: $73,671 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetTHE REACH CENTER: $56,280 over 3y, 9.3% of budgetROBESON COUNTY COMMITTEE ON DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $26,542 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetHERE in Jackson County Inc: $24,160 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetFAMILY ABUSE SERVICE OF ALAMANCE COUNTY INC: $20,253 over 1y, 1.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cannon Foundation…North Carolina Commun…The Leon Levine Found…Foundation for the Ca…The North Carolina Co…Duke Energy FoundationThe Bank of America C…Charities Aid Foundat…Natl Christian Charit…National Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…
The Cannon Foundation IncNC19.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cannon Foundation Inc · North Carolina Community Foundation · The Leon Levine Foundation · Foundation for the Carolinas · The North Carolina Coalition Against Domestic Violence · Duke Energy Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization North Carolina Coalition to End Hom funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from North Carolina Coalition to End Hom. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on North Carolina Coalition to End Hom’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home