· Public charity
North Carolina Coalition to End Hom
To end homelessness by creating alliances, encouraging public dialogue, securing resources and advocating for systemic change.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 47% of NORTH CAROLINA COALITION TO END HOM’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $179k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $692k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HOMEWARD BOUND OF WESTERN NC | $190,322 |
| HOUSING COLLABORATIVE | $163,800 |
| SIXTH AVENUE PSYCHIATRIC REHABILIAT | $146,475 |
| JOHNSTON-LEE-HARNETT COMMUNITY ACTI | $72,973 |
| GREATER HICKORY COOPERATIVE CHRISTI | $61,636 |
| TRILLIUM HEALTH RESOURCES | $56,739 |
| WILSON COUNTY INTERFAITH SERVICES | $41,022 |
| DIAKONOS INC | $28,726 |
| THE REACH CENTER | $26,278 |
| Individual grant recipient | $22,674 |
| COMMUNITY LINK | $21,882 |
| CENTRAL PIEDMON COMMUNITY ACTION | $19,999 |
| HERE IN JACKSON COUNTY INC | $18,214 |
| PARTNERS BEHAVIORAL HEALTH | $7,803 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $130k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
15 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $218k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HBHOMEWARD BOUND OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC2× · 2021–2022 · $361k · revenue +56%
- SASIXTH AVENUE PSYCHIATRIC REHABILITATION PARTNERS INC5× · 2019–2023 · $342k · revenue +140%
HOUSING FOR NEW HOPE3× · 2020–2022 · $322k · revenue +50%
Funded once
- NSNC STATE UNIVERSITYone grant, 2018 · $29k
- RCROBESON COUNTY COMMITTEE ON DOMESTIC VIOLENCEone grant, 2019 · $27k · revenue +24%
- FAFAMILY ABUSE SERVICE OF ALAMANCE COUNTY INCone grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -28%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Abuse Prevention Council provides emergency, advocacy, counseling, education and specialized services for victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, and homeless individuals and families.
Through shelter and housing, advocacy and supportive services, our mission is to prevent and end homelessness in our community.
Safety, empowerment, and social change for victims of domestic violence and their families. to that end we offer a full compendium of services for victims of domestic violence.
Safe harbour provides a continuum of housing and supportive services for homeless and nearly homeless individuals and families in our communities.
To provide food and shelter for the homeless
Partners ending homelessness encourages public understanding of the causes and conditions of homelessness and leads a strong and stable system of care for individuals and families to reduce homelessness in guilford county.
Provied temporary and emergency and low income housing and secured shelter.
Hsp gives hope, inspires change, and provides opportunity by mobilizing the community in the fight against poverty.
Housing initiative partnership, inc. (hip) develops innovative affordable housing, revitalizes neighborhoods and equips people to achieve their housing and financial goals. hip's vision is that every person lives in high-quality affordable…
Faith Family Hospitality's mission is to support families experiencing homelessness to achieve sustainable self-sufficiency in a timely and dignified manner. This interfaith volunteer effort coordinates the work of 30 diverse Fort Collins…
The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.
We are dedicated to a community free from family violence, sexual assault, stalking and/or human trafficking through empowerment, support and education.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Homeward Bound of Western North Carolina Inc and the most unlike its peers is Domestic Abuse Intervention Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Housing Collaborative ↗
- Who funds HOMEWARD BOUND OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC ↗
- Who funds SIXTH AVENUE PSYCHIATRIC REHABILITATION PARTNERS INC ↗
- Who funds HOUSING FOR NEW HOPE ↗
- Who funds JOHNSTON-LEE-HARNETT COMMUNITY ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds Community Link Programs of Travelers Aid Society of Central Carolinas Inc ↗
- Who funds Wilson County Interfaith Services Inc ↗
- Who funds GREATER HICKORY COOPERATIVE CHRISTIAN MINISTRY ↗
- Who funds FIRST FRUIT MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds DOMESTIC ABUSE INTERVENTION SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds DIAKONOS INC ↗
- Who funds THE REACH CENTER ↗
- Who funds ROBESON COUNTY COMMITTEE ON DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds HERE in Jackson County Inc ↗
- Who funds FAMILY ABUSE SERVICE OF ALAMANCE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL PIEDMONT COMMUNITY ACTION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Cannon Foundation Inc · North Carolina Community Foundation · The Leon Levine Foundation · Foundation for the Carolinas · The North Carolina Coalition Against Domestic Violence · Duke Energy Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization North Carolina Coalition to End Hom funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.