· Public charity
National Film Preservation Foundation
The NFPF is a nonprofit organization established in the District of Columbia resulting from an Act of Congress in order to preserve and make publicly accessible our nations film heritage.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k7 grants · $56k
- $10k–50k24 grants · $506k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $123k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| George Eastman Museum | $65,720 |
| Smithsonian Library and Archi | $57,340 |
| Chicago Film Society | $37,590 |
| University of California San | $37,450 |
| Association of Moving Image A | $36,800 |
| NYU Fales Library | $32,370 |
| Univ of South Carolina | $31,400 |
| Knox Cty Public Library TAMI | $29,090 |
| Berkeley Art Museum and Pacif | $20,860 |
| National Museum of African Ar | $20,000 |
| New York Public Library | $20,000 |
| NMAAHC Smithsonian Inst | $20,000 |
| Yale University | $19,690 |
| Chicago Film Archives | $19,670 |
| Phoenix Arts Alliance | $19,660 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 53% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
31 repeat relationships — 29 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GEGEORGE EASTMAN MUSEUM4× · 2021–2024 · $388k · revenue +17%
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION4× · 2021–2024 · $305k · revenue +8%- CFChicago Film Society4× · 2021–2024 · $145k · revenue +104% · 53% of their budget
Funded once
- TSThe Silent Film Festivalone grant, 2023 · $80k · revenue -13%
- AIAPPALSHOP INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $62k · revenue +95%
- CNCAMERA NEWS INCone grant, 2023 · $42k · revenue -29%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.
See schedule omuseum of the moving image (momi) is the only museum in the u.s. that explores the central technology of the present moment.screens are all around us. we use them to educate, entertain, and communicate. the moving…
See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…
Home to the art and legacy of the american painter clyfford still, we invite all to explore the potential of individual creative endeavor.
Founded in 1881 the Staten Island Museum engages visitors with interdisciplinary exhibitions, public programs, and educational activities for all ages. It is the mission of the Staten Island Museum to spark curiosity and generate…
The phillips collection is the oldest museum of modern and contemporary art in the u.s. in addition to presentation of works from the permanent collection and special exhibitions, the museum maintains active educational, academic,…
Anthology film archives is a major center for independent, noncommercial and avant-garde cinema. the organization maintains and operates an internationally recognized facility for the physical preservation, exhibition and study of…
The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)
The academy museum of motion pictures advances the understanding, celebration, and preservation of cinema through inclusive and accessible exhibitions, screenings, programs, initiatives, and collections. welcoming visitors from los angeles…
The metropolitan museum of art collects, studies, conserves, and presents significant works of art across all times and cultures in order to connect people to creativity, knowledge, and ideas.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Walker Art Center and the most unlike its peers is Huna Heritage Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 54 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GEORGE EASTMAN MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ↗
- Who funds Chicago Film Society ↗
- Who funds Friends of the Knox County Public Library ↗
- Who funds Pan Am Historical Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION OF MOVING IMAGE ARCHIVISTS ↗
- Who funds The Silent Film Festival ↗
- Who funds New York University ↗
- Who funds Yale University ↗
- Who funds ALASKA MOVING IMAGE PRESERVATION ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Chicago Film Archives NFP ↗
- Who funds APPALSHOP INC ↗
- Who funds The New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations ↗
- Who funds National Gallery of Art ↗
- Who funds Paso del Norte Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds Eleutherian Mills-Hagley Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds PITTSBURGH SOUND AND IMAGE ↗
- Who funds CAMERA NEWS INC ↗
- Who funds Phoenix Arts Alliance Inc ↗
- Who funds Filipino American Historical Society of Chicago ↗
- Who funds CRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds ROGER TORY PETERSON INSTITUTE OF NA ↗
- Who funds WALKER ART CENTER ↗
- Who funds American Museum of Natural History ↗
- Who funds VISUAL COMMUNICATIONS MEDIA ↗
- Who funds MOORE COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN ↗
- Who funds Frameline Inc ↗
- Who funds DOCUMENTARY EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Huna Heritage Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE TED STEVENS FOUNDATION FKA NORTH TO THE FUTURE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HARTFORD PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Academy Foundation · California Humanities · The Ford Foundation · The Andrew W Mellon Foundation · California Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization National Film Preservation Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Yale University — 12% of income from government
- Southern Oregon Historical Society Inc — 4% of income from government
- Documentary Educational Resources Inc — 1% of income from government
- Bruce Museum Inc — 0% of income from government
- Eleutherian Mills-Hagley Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to National Film Preservation Foundation?
Find your warmest path to National Film Preservation Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.