Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

National Diaper Bank Network Inc

The national diaper bank works to end poverty in the u.s.

$6.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
30
Grants FY2025still arriving
21
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Human Services$1.9MFood & Nutrition$46kHealth$42kPublic Benefit$29kReligion$27kCommunity Improvement$16kHousing & Shelter$15kPhilanthropy$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 30 grants below total $279,175 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $6,404,083 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $6,124,908 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $79k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $125k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$7,100
Median grant
21
States reached
$4.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Baby's Bounty$75,000
Diaper Bank of the Delta$25,000
Moms Helping Moms Foundation$17,500
Babies Need Bottoms Inc$17,000
Athens Area Diaper Bank$12,500
St Louis Area Diaper Bank$11,645
Helping Mamas Inc$11,300
WeeCycle$10,000
A Baby Center$10,000
The Diaper Collective of Northwest Arkansas$10,000
Diaper Bank of North Carolina$9,100
Diaper Bank for Northeast Florida$8,800
Miami Diaper Bank$7,600
Healthy Start Coalition of Southwest Florida Inc$7,600
Power In Changing$7,100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 73% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Women4Women: $21k → 11%IT TAKES A VILLAGE: $10k → 12%MITZVAH CIRCLE FOUNDATION: $38k → 7%Aloha Diaper Bank: $10k → 9%Central New York Diaper Bank Inc: $10k → 14%Hope Supply Co: $10k → 14%Diaper Bank for Northeast Florida: $11k → 14%Miami Diaper Bank: $13k → 15%The Diaper Alliance: $20k → 9%Giving the Basics Wichita: $27k → 16%St Louis Area Diaper Bank: $41k → 11%Jake's Diapers dba Jake's Network of Hope: $10k → 11%Milwaukee Diaper Mission Inc: $50k → 17%Helping Mamas - Knoxville: $10k → 12%DIAPER BANK OF NORTH CAROLINA: $12k → 11%UTAH DIAPER BANK: $10k → 8%Little Lambs Foundation for Kids: $14k → 12%WeeCycle: $10k → 8%Raising Girls: $17k → 9%Loving Bottoms Diaper Bank: $14k → 15%Moms Helping Moms Foundation: $18k → 5%Baby's Bounty: $75k → 13%Basic Necessities: $10k → 22%AIO Food & Energy Assistance: $10k → 11%Dignity Matters: $17k → 8%It Takes a Village: $10k → 12%Mitzvah Circle Foundation: $25k → 7%THE HOPELINE: $10k → 28%Metropolitan Detroit Diaper Bank: $10k → 21%Giving the Basics Wichita Inc: $10k → 16%St Louis Area Diaper Bank: $12k → 11%Milwaukee Diaper Mission: $19k → 17%Diaper Bank of North Carolina: $31k → 11%Utah Diaper Bank: $10k → 8%Spokane Valley Partners: $10k → 12%Moms Helping Moms Foundation: $16k → 5%BASIC NECESSITIES: $10k → 22%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $38k → 22%Sisters On The Streets: $21k → 14%Her Village Inc: $17k → 17%METROPOLITAN DETROIT DIAPER BANK: $10k → 21%St Louis Area Diaper Bank: $10k → 11%UTAH DIAPER BANK: $10k → 8%Helping Mamas Inc: $26k → 9%SISTERS ON THE STREETS: $10k → 14%Austin Diaper Bank: $14k → 10%METROPOLITAN DETROIT DIAPER BANK: $10k → 21%Helping Mamas Inc: $11k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
VA
MD
AZ
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.5M · 61 repeat orgs$554k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +97% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.

61 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2025, 40 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

61
58

Total granted

$1.5M
$501k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+97%
+27%

Still filing today

89%
74%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $53k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHealthCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BB
    BABY'S BOUNTY
    5× · 2017–2025 · $80k · revenue +977%
  • MILWAUKEE DIAPER MISSION INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $74k · revenue +109%
  • MC
    MITZVAH CIRCLE FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $71k · revenue +448%

Funded once

  • CF
    CENTER FOR LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT & ADVOCACY
    one grant, 2021 · $38k
  • PA
    PAMPER AND DIAPER MY BABY
    2× · 2021–2025 · $38k
  • WT
    Women4Women Tempe Inc
    5× · 2020–2025 · $21k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Diaper Bank of Orange Ulster and Sullivan Inc
Human Services
2
Diaper Bank of Skagit County

To ensure that families living in poverty have an adequate supply of diapers for their infants and toddlers to raise community awareness that basic human needs include diapers and that these needs are not being met for children living in…

—
3
National Diaper Bank Network Inc

The national diaper bank works to end poverty in the u.s. so children, families, and individuals can access the material basic needs that all people require to thrive. the organization focuses on ending diaper need and period poverty in…

Human Services
4
Women Giving Back Inc

Women Giving Back (WGB) supports vulnerable families in the Greater Washington DC area by providing quality clothing and other essentials at no cost assisted by a caring and committed community.

Employment
5
Dayton Diaper Depot

Our Mission: To improve the community's social, economic, and health outcomes by providing access to basic hygiene products for those who need them most. Our Vision: For every baby's cry to be met with a clean diaper and help every parent…

Health
6
Mothers for Others Inc

Mothers for Others supports the well-being of low and limited income families by providing diapers for children from birth to three years old. It is the largest independent diaper bank in Fairfield County.

Human Services
7
Wrapped in Love Diaper Bank

Distributing free diapers and hygiene products to individuals at 185% or less of the federal poverty guidelines.

Human Services
8
Bambino Basket Inc

Bambino Basket supports families in need through the donation of diapers, clothing and other baby essentials.

Human Services
9
Beantown Baby Diaper Bank

To reduce diaper need in Greater Boston communities while raising awareness of how diaper disparity perpetuates the cycle of poverty.

Human Services
10
Hands for Mom
Human Services
11
Croton-Cortlandt Food Pantry

Croton Cortlandt Food Pantry's primary mission is to provide food assistance to families and individuals who are food insecure and have difficulty meeting their basic nutritional needs on their own. The pantry also provides diapers and…

Food & Nutrition
12
Twin Tiers Baby Bank

We are a diaper bank, providing diapers and wipes and ointment and other necessities to families in need.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Diaper Bank of Connecticut Inc and the most unlike its peers is Speed Family Blessing Box & Pantry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPregnancy Support ServicesCommunity FoundationsUnited Way AffiliatesChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Food Banks and PantriesAffordable Housing Developm…Cancer Support ServicesCommunity FoundationsFaith-Based Social ServicesWomen & Girls Leadership De…Community Food PantriesSenior Support ServicesMilitary Veterans SupportHealth Access Advocacy and …Independent K-12 SchoolsJewish Community Organizati…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 14 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr14%21%5–10yr19%33%10–20yr16%14%20–35yr13%14%35–55yr16%14%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%4%<5yr14%20%5–10yr19%51%10–20yr16%17%20–35yr13%3%35–55yr16%4%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%7/272
the rest of the field
13%
240,389/1,819,293

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

208 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
79
Early backer (in before they grew)
203/208
Grantees still filing
143/208
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BABY'S BOUNTY — $80,000 · Human ServicesBABY'S BOUNTYMILWAUKEE DIAPER MISSION INC — $74,000 · Human ServicesMILWAUKEE DIAPER MISSION INCMITZVAH CIRCLE FOUNDATION — $71,273 · Human ServicesMITZVAH CIRCLE FOUNDATIONDIAPER BANK OF NORTH CAROLINA — $60,248 · Human ServicesHELPING MAMAS INC — $59,861 · Human ServicesST LOUIS AREA DIAPER BANK — $57,543 · Human ServicesMOMS HELPING MOMS FOUNDATION INC — $49,125 · Human ServicesCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC — $48,150 · Human Services+59 more — $823,587 · Human Services+59 moreThe Greater Philadelphia Diaper Bank — $48,575 · OtherThe Greater Philadelphia Dia…CENTER FOR LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT & ADVOCACY — $38,000 · OtherCENTER FOR LEADERSHIP DEVELO…PAMPER AND DIAPER MY BABY — $38,000 · OtherPAMPER AND DIAPER MY BABYTHE DIAPER BANK OF CONNECTICUT INC — $34,000 · OtherTHE DIAPER BANK OF CONNECTIC…Coahoma County Diaper Bank Diaper Bank of the Delta — $25,000 · OtherPOWER IN CHANGING — $22,150 · OtherDIAPER BANK OF THE OZARKS — $20,000 · OtherArizona Diaper Bank — $26,000 · OtherBundles of Hope Inc — $20,675 · Other+33 more — $253,450 · Other+33 moreTEXAS DIAPER BANK — $36,600 · HealthATHENS AREA DIAPER BANK INC — $17,550 · HealthAlliance for Period Supplies of SWFL Inc — $16,898 · HealthANSHE EMETH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP OF CENTRAL NJ INC — $6,000 · HealthNEBRASKA DIAPER BANK — $12,600 · Food & NutritionWALWORTH COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC — $7,500 · Food & NutritionMID-SOUTH FOOD BANK — $5,075 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF EAST CENTRAL INDIANA INC — $5,000 · Food & NutritionTREASURE COAST FOOD BANK INC — $2,800 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST GEORGIA INC — $2,500 · Food & Nutrition+1 more — $1,170 · Food & NutritionJewish Community Alliance Southern Maine — $18,025 · Philanthropy(914) CARES INC — $8,500 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF WELD COUNTY INC — $6,050 · PhilanthropySHAREBABY INC — $31,750 · Arts & CultureTHE COLORADO NONPROFIT DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $10,000 · Community ImprovementJunior League of Riverside Inc — $10,000 · Community ImprovementTHE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF TAMPA INC — $6,200 · Community ImprovementTHE JUNIOR LEAGUE OF THE CHAMPLAIN VALLEY INC — $5,000 · Community Improvement
Human Services$1,323,787Other$525,850Health$77,048Food & Nutrition$36,645Philanthropy$32,575Arts & Culture$31,750Community Improvement$31,200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBABY'S BOUNTY — $80,000 over 5y, 5.7% of budgetMILWAUKEE DIAPER MISSION INC — $74,000 over 4y, 8.1% of budgetMITZVAH CIRCLE FOUNDATION — $71,273 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetDIAPER BANK OF NORTH CAROLINA — $60,248 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetHELPING MAMAS INC — $59,861 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetST LOUIS AREA DIAPER BANK — $57,543 over 7y, 3.9% of budgetMOMS HELPING MOMS FOUNDATION INC — $49,125 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC — $48,150 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetSIMPLY HYGIENE INC — $36,898 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetTEXAS DIAPER BANK — $36,600 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetTHE DIAPER BANK OF CONNECTICUT INC — $34,000 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetCOVERD GREATER CINCINNATI — $33,625 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetNORTH VALLEY CARING SERVICES — $33,558 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetMetropolitan Diaper Bank — $33,375 over 9y, 2.7% of budgetUTAH DIAPER BANK — $32,500 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetSHAREBABY INC — $31,750 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetBabies Need Bottoms Inc — $28,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetHER VILLAGE INC — $27,898 over 5y, 14% of budgetArizona Diaper Bank — $26,000 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA DIAPER BANK — $25,100 over 9y, 3.4% of budgetDIAPER BANK FOR NORTHEAST FLORIDA — $24,800 over 3y, 5.4% of budgetAUSTIN DIAPER BANK — $24,225 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetKIDVANTAGE — $23,250 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetTHE DIAPER ALLIANCE INC — $22,500 over 9y, 4.7% of budgetBundles of Hope Inc — $20,675 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetMIAMI DIAPER BANK INC — $20,300 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetWEECYCLE — $20,075 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetBASIC NECESSITIES — $20,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetDIAPER BANK OF THE OZARKS — $20,000 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetHILLTOWN VILLAGE — $20,000 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetHELPING WOMEN PERIOD INC — $19,898 over 6y, 8.6% of budgetLOVING BOTTOMS DIAPER BANK — $19,000 over 8y, 4.8% of budgetJewish Community Alliance Southern Maine — $18,025 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetHOPE SUPPLY CO — $17,725 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetATHENS AREA DIAPER BANK INC — $17,550 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetPDX DIAPER BANK — $17,500 over 6y, 3.8% of budgetRAISING GIRLS — $16,939 over 2y, 8.6% of budgetDignity Matters Inc — $16,898 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetAlliance for Period Supplies of SWFL Inc — $16,898 over 5y, 9.0% of budgetNASHVILLE DIAPER CONNECTION — $15,175 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetCentral New York Diaper Bank — $15,075 over 8y, 3.5% of budgetALLIED FOUNDATION INC — $15,025 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetALOHA DIAPER BANK — $15,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetBABIES OF HOMELESSNESS — $15,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetThe Resource Center For Community Development Inc — $15,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetLittle Lambs Foundation for Kids Inc — $14,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetNEBRASKA DIAPER BANK — $12,600 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetYOUTHBRIDGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $10,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BABY'S BOUNTY ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE DIAPER MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds MITZVAH CIRCLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DIAPER BANK OF NORTH CAROLINA ↗
  • Who funds HELPING MAMAS INC ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS AREA DIAPER BANK ↗
  • Who funds MOMS HELPING MOMS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The Greater Philadelphia Diaper Bank ↗
  • Who funds CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC ↗
  • Who funds SIMPLY HYGIENE INC ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS DIAPER BANK ↗
  • Who funds THE DIAPER BANK OF CONNECTICUT INC ↗
  • Who funds COVERD GREATER CINCINNATI ↗
  • Who funds NORTH VALLEY CARING SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds Metropolitan Diaper Bank ↗
  • Who funds UTAH DIAPER BANK ↗
  • Who funds SHAREBABY INC ↗
  • Who funds Babies Need Bottoms Inc ↗
  • Who funds HER VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds Arizona Diaper Bank ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA DIAPER BANK ↗
  • Who funds Coahoma County Diaper Bank Diaper Bank of the Delta ↗
  • Who funds DIAPER BANK FOR NORTHEAST FLORIDA ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN DIAPER BANK ↗
  • Who funds KIDVANTAGE ↗
  • Who funds THE DIAPER ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds Women4Women Tempe Inc ↗
  • Who funds Bundles of Hope Inc ↗
  • Who funds MIAMI DIAPER BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds WEECYCLE ↗
  • Who funds BASIC NECESSITIES ↗
  • Who funds DIAPER BANK OF THE OZARKS ↗
  • Who funds HILLTOWN VILLAGE ↗
  • Who funds HELPING WOMEN PERIOD INC ↗
  • Who funds LOVING BOTTOMS DIAPER BANK ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Community Alliance Southern Maine ↗
  • Who funds HOPE SUPPLY CO ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baby2babyRightgift FoundationGood360Delivering Good IncFor the Girls IncGood Plus Foundation …Liberty Mutual Founda…The Toy Foundation IncJms Foundation IncSimple Generosity Fou…Perigee FundThe Gap Foundation
Baby2babyCA87.7× affinity52 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baby2baby · Rightgift Foundation · Good360 · Delivering Good Inc · For the Girls Inc · Good Plus Foundation Inc · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · The Toy Foundation Inc · Jms Foundation Inc · Simple Generosity Foundation · Perigee Fund · The Gap Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization National Diaper Bank Network Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 110%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • The Diaper Bank of Connecticut Inc — 49% of income from government
  • Hilltown Village — 7% of income from government
  • Pdx Diaper Bank — 2% of income from government
  • Treasure Coast Food Bank Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc — 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
43report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 128 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home