· Private foundation
Rightgift Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ASSISTANCE LEAGUE - NATIONAL | $3,529 |
| ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF ALBUQUERQUE | $1,884 |
| GIVING THE BASICS | $1,090 |
| GOOD360 | $1,069 |
| BULLARD FAMILY FOUNDATION | $796 |
| ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF DENVER | $780 |
| CARE TO LEARN | $765 |
| YMCA OF CENTRAL KENTUCKY | $612 |
| BROTHER BILL'S HELPING HAND | $496 |
| GRANITE ECUCATION FOUNDATION | $379 |
| HARVEST COMPASSION CENTER | $341 |
| UNDER 21 DBA COVENANT HOUSE NEW YORK | $324 |
| ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF GREATER WILMINGTON | $314 |
| ASSITANCE LEAGUE OF BAKERSFIELD | $260 |
| WEST40 EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $260 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
60 repeat relationships — 37 still active in FY2024, 23 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $546 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ALAssistance League of Albuquerque4× · 2021–2024 · $5k · revenue +89%
- BFBULLARD FAMILY FOUNDATION INC3× · 2022–2024 · $4k · revenue +44%
- GGOOD3603× · 2022–2024 · $3k · revenue +22%
Funded once
- NANATIONAL ASSISTANCE LEAGUEone grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue -20%
- SPSydney Paige Foundationone grant, 2022 · $677 · revenue -9%
- OWONE WARM COATgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $673 · revenue +28%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Women Giving Back (WGB) supports vulnerable families in the Greater Washington DC area by providing quality clothing and other essentials at no cost assisted by a caring and committed community.
Assistance League Pomona Valley is a nonprofit volunteer organization dedicated to improving the lives and well-being of children and families in our communities.
Assistance League of Orange volunteers transform lives and strengthen our community through philanthropic programs in and around the city of Orange.
Assistance League volunteers transforming the lives of women, children and families through community programs
Assistance league of mid-missouri is a nonprofit, all volunteer organization that operates multiple programs serving identified needs of children and adults in boone county, missouri.
Assistance League of Whittier transforming the lives of children and adults through community programs.
Assistance League of Arcadia volunteers transform the lives of children and adults through community programs.
We build our community's capacity to alleviate the impact of poverty and empower families to unleash their potential.
Moms on a Mission provides personal care and household essentials to families transitioning out of homelessness.
Babies & Beyond journeys with women and families through the challenges and joys of pregnancy and early childhood by providing life-affirming, compassionate support, sharing materials and creating community connections.
Assistance league of boise idaho volunteers transform the lives of children and adults through community programs.
Charity in community. assistance to those in need. service support to children and adults.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Greater Richmond & Petersburg and the most unlike its peers is Desoto Area Chamber. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
125 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 125 of the 196 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Assistance League of Albuquerque ↗
- Who funds BULLARD FAMILY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GOOD360 ↗
- Who funds GIVING THE BASICS INC ↗
- Who funds Care to Learn ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER LEXINGTON KENTUCKY ↗
- Who funds BROTHER BILLS HELPING HAND ↗
- Who funds Share our Spare ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ASSISTANCE LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds VALLEY BLOOM ↗
- Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA INC ↗
- Who funds YOLO COUNTY CHILDRENS ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds UNDER 21 ↗
- Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF DENVER ↗
- Who funds United Way of Greater Cincinnati ↗
- Who funds Sydney Paige Foundation ↗
- Who funds ONE WARM COAT ↗
- Who funds Granite Education Foundation ↗
- Who funds KIDS IN NEED FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF KANSAS CITY ↗
- Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF GREATER WILMINGTON ↗
- Who funds PERIOD INC ↗
- Who funds Women4Women Tempe Inc ↗
- Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds UPLIFT NORTH ↗
- Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF VICTOR VALLEY ↗
- Who funds Boca Helps Ukraine Inc ↗
- Who funds STUDENT SUPPORT NETWORK INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: National Diaper Bank Network Inc · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Lumen Clarke M Williams Foundation · The Gap Foundation · American Express Foundation · Nathan B & Florence R Burt Foundation · AT&T Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · The Papa John's Foundation Inc · The Reser Family Foundation · Centene Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Rightgift Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Covenant House New Jersey Inc — 34% of income from government
- York Street Project — 32% of income from government
- Center for Food Action in New Jersey — 0% of income from government
- Period Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.