· Public charity
Delivering Good Inc
Delivering good helps people facing hardship and disaster move forward by working with our partners to match them with new, essential items and services - providing care that supports dignity, renews hope, and opens doors to opportunity.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2022.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 3 grants below total $85,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $154,969,459 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $154,884,459 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MERCY INCORPORATED | $35,000 |
| WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCORPORATED | $25,000 |
| RAZOM INC | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $73k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +106% since the first grant, against +43% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2022, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $85k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
FARM SHARE INC6× · 2017–2022 · $175k · revenue +106%- NYNEW YORK DISASTER INTERFAITH SERVICES INC3× · 2017–2020 · $135k · revenue +83%
- CBCARLOS BELTRAN BASEBALL ACADEMY INC2× · 2017–2018 · $115k · revenue +82%
Funded once
- FYFUNDACION YO NO ME QUITO INCone grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue -97%
- MCMETHODIST CHURCH OF PUERTO RICOone grant, 2018 · $75k
- GEGLOBAL EMPOWERMENT MISSION INCgraduated2× · 2017–2018 · $55k · revenue +816%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of YCC is to build a healthier community by empowering young people and families to rise above adversity.
To operate residential and non-residential programs for victims of domestic violence.
The child center of ny strengthens children and families with skills, opportunities, and emotional support to build healthy, successful lives.
Covenant house georgia provides shelters, protects and advocates on behalf of homeless, trafficked, runaway and sexually exploited youth.
Chs empowers individuals and families to live in stable housing, connect to community resources, build relationships and access quality food.
Faith Family Hospitality's mission is to support families experiencing homelessness to achieve sustainable self-sufficiency in a timely and dignified manner. This interfaith volunteer effort coordinates the work of 30 diverse Fort Collins…
Empowering individuals to build stronger families and communities.
Covenant house washington, dc ("chw") provides shelter, crisis care, community services, and outreach services to youth in the washington dc area.
The organization serves homeless low income and displaced persons with housing food clothing and transportation expenses. our advocates also assist persons who are victims of domestic violence abuse or general crime.
diaspora community services is a social support service agency that empowers low income families and individuals to maximize their abilities to overcome obstacles to their well-being and self-sufficiency.
Empower and provide support to families with children experiencing homelessness in Central Minnesota.
Treating substance use disorders, rebuilding lives, strengthening families, and empowering women.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fostering Hope Florida Inc and the most unlike its peers is Worth Fighting 4. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 5% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
682 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FARM SHARE INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK DISASTER INTERFAITH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds CARLOS BELTRAN BASEBALL ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds FUNDACION YO NO ME QUITO INC ↗
- Who funds ISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL EMPOWERMENT MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds HOUSTON AREA URBAN LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS INC ↗
- Who funds Mercy Incorporated ↗
- Who funds RAZOM INC ↗
- Who funds BANCO DE ALIMENTOS PUERTO RICO INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds CARING FOR OTHERS INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HUNGER FUND ↗
- Who funds HEROES CARE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Toy Foundation Inc · The New World Foundation · The Gap Foundation · One Warm Coat · Zumiez Foundation · Feed the Children Inc · In-N-Out Burgers Foundation · Good360 · Shelter Partnership Inc · Mary Kay Ash Foundation · Soles4souls Inc · Bobs Discount Furniture Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Delivering Good Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Farm Share Inc — 6% of income from government
- Global Empowerment Mission Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.