· Public charity
Good Plus Foundation Inc
Founded in 2001, good+foundation is a leading national non-profit that works to dismantle multi-generational poverty by pairing tangible goods with innovative services for low-income fathers, mothers, and caregivers, creating an upward trajectory for the whole family.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 30 grants below total $325,800 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $14,210,760 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $13,884,960 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k20 grants · $144k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $181k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AVANCE INC | $30,000 |
| MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER | $29,000 |
| EL NIDO FAMILY CENTERS | $28,000 |
| SCO FAMILY OF SERVICES | $16,000 |
| SHIELDS FOR FAMILIES | $14,600 |
| PUBLIC HEALTH SOLUTIONS | $14,000 |
| FORESTDALE INC | $13,000 |
| PASSAGES CONNECTING FATHERS AND SONS INC | $12,800 |
| LIFT INC | $12,000 |
| PROJECT JOY | $12,000 |
| ST ANNES MATERNITY HOME | $8,000 |
| PENNY LANE CENTERS | $8,000 |
| HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES | $8,000 |
| CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC | $8,000 |
| LA COUNTY DEPT OF PUBLIC HEALTH | $8,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $405k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
36 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ENEL NIDO FAMILY CENTERS7× · 2018–2024 · $150k · revenue +40%
- MMMONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER6× · 2018–2024 · $76k · revenue +51%
- FIFORESTDALE INC7× · 2018–2024 · $67k · revenue +124%
Funded once
- CFCENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES INCgraduated2× · 2019–2020 · $50k · revenue +117%
- DPDAD PROJECT3× · 2020–2022 · $10k
CENTER FOR FAMILY REPRESENTATION INCgraduated4× · 2018–2022 · $6k · revenue +67%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Little flower is committed to improving the well-being of the children, families, and individuals with developmental disabilities across nyc and long island so they can reach their full potential. little flower transforms caring into…
The organization is dedicated to combining education and advocacy to expand opportunities for children and families in order to strengthen the voice of the latino community based on the belief that the most effective way to support latino…
To provide a safe, affordable and comprehensive program of high-quality early childhood education, parental and family support, as well as academic enrichment and recreational programs.
All children need a childhood. Allies for Every Child brings together and strengthens families, cultivating conditions for children to succeed in life. (Continues on Schedule O)
Provide social, legal & behavioral health services to individuals and families affected by life-altering events.
To provide social service programs for families and individuals enabling people of all ages to reach their full potential.
The center for comprehensive health practice, inc. provides accessible, community-based treatment that integrates primary healthcare with substance use and behavioral health services for all children, adolescents, adults, and families…
Through a holistic approach to emotional well-being, Wellnest offers hope, healing, and opportunity to the children, young adults, families, and communities we serve. Our commitment remains steadfast as we enter our second century of…
To foster the healthy development of children and families and seek to empower them to respond constructively to negative societal factors including racism and its related consequences. through comprehensive, high quality mental health and…
Provide intensive in-home support to developmentally and emotionally disturbed children and adolescents and their families.
By advocating for quality early care and education, empowering families with information and financial support, and building the capabilities of educators, Children's Council of San Francisco ensures that every child in San Francisco has…
Since 1972, under 21, d.b.a. covenant house new york (chny) has been working with one of new york city's most vulnerable populations - youth experiencing homelessness, age 16-24, and their dependent children. chny provides young people…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Child Center of Ny Inc and the most unlike its peers is Knock Knock Give a Sock. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
122 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EL NIDO FAMILY CENTERS ↗
- Who funds SHIELDS FOR FAMILIES ↗
- Who funds MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds FORESTDALE INC ↗
- Who funds SCO FAMILY OF SERVICES ↗
- Who funds LIFT INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC HEALTH SOLUTIONS ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds Penny Lane Centers ↗
- Who funds NIDO DE ESPERANZA CHARITABLE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S HOUSING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds LAGUARDIA EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OUTSIDE IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY ↗
- Who funds ONEGENERATION ↗
- Who funds SAFE HORIZON INC ↗
- Who funds SHELTERING ARMS CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds PEDIATRIC AND FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER DBA EISNER HEALTH ↗
- Who funds St Anne's Family Services ↗
- Who funds THE LOS ANGELES VALLEY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds STRIVE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR ALTERNATIVE SENTENCING AND EMPLOYMENT SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds ALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds THE CHILD CENTER OF NY INC ↗
- Who funds LENOX HILL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S LAW CENTER OF CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK FOUNDLING ↗
- Who funds Passages Connecting Fathers & Sons ↗
- Who funds PROJECT JOY ↗
- Who funds FUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds LITTLE SISTERS OF THE ASSUMPTION FAMILY HEALTH SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds VENICE FAMILY CLINIC ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN MANHATTAN PERINATAL PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR FAMILY REPRESENTATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Robin Hood Foundation · Baby2baby · California Community Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · United Way Inc · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · Shelter Partnership Inc · The Rose Hills Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · Weingart Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Pinkerton Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Good Plus Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Center for Urban Families Inc — 36% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.