Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Monterra Community Fund

MONTERRA COMMUNITY FUND is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit fund created by monterra credit union to support our commitment to financial wellness in our community.

$62k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Human Services$7.9MCommunity Improvement$7.9MYouth Development$3.4MEducation$2.7MFood & Nutrition$2.4MRecreation & Sports$1.0MHealth$452kArts & Culture$248kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 1 grants below total $17,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $61,968 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $44,968 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$17,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$411k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THRIVE ALLIANCE$17,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $2.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 40% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%THE MULTICULTURAL INSTITUTE: $10k → 10%LIFE STEPS FOUNDATION INC: $15k → 14%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $55k → 10%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $5k → 10%SUPPORT LIFE FOUNDATION: $15k → 10%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $825k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES CYO OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN FRANCISCO: $20k → 10%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $192k → 10%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SILICON VALLEY: $95k → 8%MARTHA'S KITCHEN: $20k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $20k → 10%NEWTON CENTER: $359k → 7%RETRAINING THE VILLAGE: $15k → 8%PALCARE INC: $80k → 7%PALCARE: $55k → 7%PARTNERS AND ADVOCATES FOR REMARKABLE CHILDREN AND ADULTS: $22k → 7%PARTNERS AND ADVOCATES FOR REMARKABLE CHILDREN AND ADULTS: $20k → 7%PARTNERS AND ADVOCATES FOR REMARKABLE CHILDREN AND ADULTS: $20k → 7%GOOD TIDINGS FOUNDATION: $5k → 7%REDWOOD CITY CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM: $55k → 7%PENINSULA FAMILY SERVICE: $100k → 7%PENINSULA FAMILY SERVICE: $55k → 7%NORMA GIST PEOPLES FREE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM INC: $24k → 7%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF SAN MATEO COUNTY: $20k → 7%FOOTSTEPS CHILD CARE INC: $224k → 7%FOOTSTEPS CHILD CARE INC: $27k → 7%DALY CITY PENINSULA PARTNERSHIP COLLABORATIVE: $195k → 7%COASTSIDE CHILDREN'S PROGRAMS INC: $96k → 7%COASTSIDE CHILDREN'S PROGRAMS INC: $37k → 7%MY NEW RED SHOES: $10k → 7%COASTSIDE ADULT DAY HEALTH CENTER: $5k → 7%ABUNDANT GRACE COASTSIDE WORKER: $5k → 7%GEOKIDS: $55k → 7%PACIFICA RESOURCE CENTER: $20k → 7%PENINSULA JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $55k → 7%PENINSULA JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $55k → 7%OMBUDSMAN SERVICES OF SAN MATEO COUNTY: $20k → 7%ONE NEW HEARTBEAT: $10k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

40%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$11M · 138 repeat orgs$16M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +62% since the first grant, against +32% for the ones you funded once.

138 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 137 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

138
1168

Total granted

$11M
$16M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
+32%

Still filing today

17%
9%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureHealthYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA
    3× · 2020–2022 · $1.2M · revenue +133%
  • YM
    YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO
    3× · 2020–2022 · $1.1M · revenue +28%
  • FC
    FOOTSTEPS CHILD CARE INC
    2× · 2020–2022 · $251k · revenue +69%

Funded once

  • NC
    NEWTON CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $359k · revenue +77%
  • BS
    BELMONT-REDWOOD SHORES SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2022 · $260k
  • DC
    DALY CITY PENINSULA PARTNERSHIP COLLABORATIVE
    one grant, 2022 · $195k · revenue +19%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Mateo Parents Nursery School

San mateo parents nursery school is a diverse community dedicated to fostering the learning and growth of children and adults. its goal is to create a loving, suppportive, empowering environment for children and their families.

2
San Francisco High School of the Arts

San Francisco Arts and Science Academy (ASA) provides TK5 grade students with a strong foundation in the arts, language, math, and science, fostering creativity, curiosity, and character development. Our bilingual, hands-on curriculum…

Education
3
Telegraph Hill Neighborhood Association

Telegraph Hill Neighborhood Center's mission is to provide opportunities for the individuals and families in the North Beach, Chinatown,Fisherman's wharf and Mission Bay neighborhoods to enrich their quality of life.

Community Improvement
4
Children's Council of San Francisco

By advocating for quality early care and education, empowering families with information and financial support, and building the capabilities of educators, Children's Council of San Francisco ensures that every child in San Francisco has…

Human Services
5
Ala Costa Centers a Program for Developmentally Disabled

To provide each student or participant with the access, skills, and opportunities needed to become successful and productive members of society, and to encourage them to have some fun along the way. The Organization offers support and…

6
Parents for Public Schools of San Francisco

PPS-SF's mission is to promote the fundamental value of public education and pursue the success of every public school by sharing knowledge, bridging communities, and informing policy.

7
Palo Alto Community Child Care

Palo alto community child care (paccc) partners with parents and regional agencies to provide quality, professional and accessible childhood care, and education.

Human Services
8
Kiddie Kampus Cooperative Play School Inc

Kiddie Kampus is a cooperative, play-based preschool located in Alameda for children ages 2 years 9 months to 5 years old. We work together to create a nurturing, engaging preschool environment that prepares our children for kindergarten…

9
Achievekids

Achievekids schools provide individualized and multi-disciplinary programs that deliver special education, mental health, and family support services for students ages 5 to 22 who have complex and often severe developmental, emotional, and…

Education
10
Novato Parents Nursery School Inc

To deliver affordable, reliable, and safe child care in a nurturing environment, partnering with parents in the education and development of their children and serving the community as one family

Education
11
Institute for Applied Tinkering

Institute for Applied Tinkering IAT develops, practices and shares educational methods that challenge and support all children to engage deeply in their learning via real interests and real tools.

Youth Development
12
Linda Vista Children's Center

We help children discover a way of dealing with life that is realistic, comfortable, and satisfying. Self-confidence is nurtured as children learn to rely on themselves and each other. The noncompetitive environment is one that allows each…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mid-Peninsula Boys & Girls Club Inc and the most unlike its peers is Windrider Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%2%<5yr13%8%5–10yr19%22%10–20yr18%35%20–35yr12%17%35–55yr16%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%0%<5yr13%2%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr18%26%20–35yr12%13%35–55yr16%45%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.3% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.3%4/1,307
the rest of the field
15%
383/2,578

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

133 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 133 of the 1,309 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
49
Early backer (in before they grew)
130/133
Grantees still filing
100/133
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SAN MATEO FOSTER CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT — $361,500 · OtherCabrillo Unified School District — $302,023 · Other+151 more — $8,079,267 · Other+151 moreYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO — $1,076,888 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIA…NEWTON CENTER INC — $358,805 · Human ServicesNEWTON CENTER INCFOOTSTEPS CHILD CARE INC — $251,440 · Human ServicesFOOTSTEPS CHILD CARE…DALY CITY PENINSULA PARTNERSHIP COLLABORATIVE — $195,000 · Human ServicesDALY CITY PENINSULA …PENINSULA FAMILY SERVICE — $155,000 · Human ServicesPENINSULA FAMILY SER…PALCARE INC — $135,000 · Human ServicesCoastside Childrens Programs — $133,157 · Human ServicesPENINSULA JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER — $110,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SILICON VALLEY — $95,200 · Human Services+7 more — $255,740 · Human Services+7 moreBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA — $1,199,959 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS C…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS NORTH SAN MATEO COUNTY — $458,612 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS C…LIVE IN PEACE — $187,552 · Youth DevelopmentLIVE IN PEACEBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE COASTSIDE — $65,612 · Youth Development+2 more — $40,000 · Youth DevelopmentInstitute for Human & Social Development — $180,000 · EducationRAVENSWOOD EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $176,600 · EducationASPIRE PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $75,000 · EducationAll Five — $75,000 · EducationLevantar — $67,550 · EducationHomework Central — $60,000 · EducationOPEN MIND SCHOOL — $55,500 · EducationCATALYST FAMILY INC — $55,000 · EducationEAST PALO ALTO ACADEMY FOUNDATION — $50,000 · EducationENVISIONEERS INC — $50,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $46,131 · EducationSequoia High School Education Foundation — $40,302 · EducationRiekes Center for Human Enhancement — $36,000 · Education+3 more — $83,640 · EducationPENINSULA FAMILY CONNECTIONS — $119,997 · HealthONE STEP BEYOND INC — $20,000 · HealthSouth County Community Health Center Inc dba Ravenswood Family Health Center — $20,000 · HealthFRED FINCH YOUTH CENTER — $20,000 · HealthFree At Last Community Recovery and Rehab — $20,000 · HealthNORTH EAST MEDICAL SERVICES — $20,000 · HealthEAST PALO ALTO TENNIS & TUTORING — $195,040 · Recreation & SportsCASA CIRCULO CULTURAL — $115,000 · Arts & CultureEPACENTER — $75,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$8,742,790Human Services$2,766,230Youth Development$1,951,735Education$1,050,723Health$219,997Recreation & Sports$195,040Arts & Culture$190,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA — $1,199,959 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO — $1,076,888 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS NORTH SAN MATEO COUNTY — $458,612 over 3y, 14% of budgetNEWTON CENTER INC — $358,805 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetFOOTSTEPS CHILD CARE INC — $251,440 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetEAST PALO ALTO TENNIS & TUTORING — $195,040 over 2y, 8.1% of budgetDALY CITY PENINSULA PARTNERSHIP COLLABORATIVE — $195,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetLIVE IN PEACE — $187,552 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetInstitute for Human & Social Development — $180,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetRAVENSWOOD EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $176,600 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetPENINSULA FAMILY SERVICE — $155,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FORTY-NINERS ACADEMY — $140,810 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetPALCARE INC — $135,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetCoastside Childrens Programs — $133,157 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetABILITYPATH — $130,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetST FRANCIS CENTER OF REDWOOD CITY — $120,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetPENINSULA FAMILY CONNECTIONS — $119,997 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetRedwood City Police Activities League Inc — $118,350 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetCASA CIRCULO CULTURAL — $115,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetPENINSULA JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER — $110,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMID-PENINSULA BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC — $102,007 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SILICON VALLEY — $95,200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOASTSIDE CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $95,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetEPACENTER — $75,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetASPIRE PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAll Five — $75,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetLevantar — $67,550 over 1y, 11% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE COASTSIDE — $65,612 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetPARTNERS AND ADVOCATES FOR REMARKABLE CHILDREN AND ADULTS — $62,069 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetMILLBRAE NURSERY SCHOOL — $60,915 over 2y, 8.1% of budgetHomework Central — $60,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetOPEN MIND SCHOOL — $55,500 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetREDWOOD CITY CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMINC — $55,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetGEOKIDS — $55,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetFriends to Parents — $55,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetEAST PALO ALTO ACADEMY FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetENVISIONEERS INC — $50,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $46,131 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY — $45,355 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSequoia High School Education Foundation — $40,302 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetCreative Montessori Learning Center Inc — $40,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetRiekes Center for Human Enhancement — $36,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLITTLE LEARNERS PRESCHOOL OF SAN CARLOS INC — $30,219 over 1y, 12% of budgetHANLIN FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetThrive Alliance Thrive - The Alliance of Nonprofits — $29,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetEDVENTUREMORE — $28,640 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSEA HUGGER — $25,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetPACIFICA NURSERY SCHOOL INC — $25,000 over 1y, 11% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS NORTH SAN MATEO COUNTY
  • Who funds NEWTON CENTER INC
  • Who funds FOOTSTEPS CHILD CARE INC
  • Who funds EAST PALO ALTO TENNIS & TUTORING
  • Who funds DALY CITY PENINSULA PARTNERSHIP COLLABORATIVE
  • Who funds LIVE IN PEACE
  • Who funds Institute for Human & Social Development
  • Who funds RAVENSWOOD EDUCATION FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PENINSULA FAMILY SERVICE
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FORTY-NINERS ACADEMY
  • Who funds PALCARE INC
  • Who funds Coastside Childrens Programs
  • Who funds ABILITYPATH
  • Who funds ST FRANCIS CENTER OF REDWOOD CITY
  • Who funds PENINSULA FAMILY CONNECTIONS
  • Who funds Redwood City Police Activities League Inc
  • Who funds CASA CIRCULO CULTURAL
  • Who funds PENINSULA JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER
  • Who funds MID-PENINSULA BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SILICON VALLEY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Atkinson FoundationCA86.6× affinity64 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Atkinson Foundation · The Palo Alto Community Fund · Sand Hill Foundation · Second Harvest of Silicon Valley · Bothin Foundation · Woodlawn Foundation · The San Bruno Community Foundation · Community Foundation of San Carlos · The Sobrato Family Foundation · Sunlight Giving · Embarcadero Media Foundation · Touchpoint Foundation - Host

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Monterra Community Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    35report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Monterra Community Fund?

    Find your warmest path to Monterra Community Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 1309 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph