· Public charity
Embarcadero Media Foundation
EMBARCADERO MEDIA FOUNDATION seeks to enhance the quality of life and public engagement in the san francisco bay area by supporting accurate and professional local news coverage of the region, making grants to nonprofit organizations providing needed social & human services to the community; increased in-depth and investigative…
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 63 grants below total $925,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,100,210 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $174,710 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k29 grants · $216k
- $10k–50k34 grants · $710k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| South County Community Health | $42,500 |
| Upward Scholars | $35,000 |
| Ecumenical Hunger Program | $35,000 |
| Second Harvest Food Bank | $35,000 |
| Literacy Partners Menlo Park | $35,000 |
| LifeMoves | $35,000 |
| StarVista | $35,000 |
| City of Redwood City | $35,000 |
| Boys & Girls Clubs of the Pen | $35,000 |
| St Anthonys Padua Dining Roo | $35,000 |
| Palo Alto Community Child Car | $27,500 |
| Pursuit of Excellence | $20,000 |
| EPACENTER | $20,000 |
| East Palo Alto Tennis & Tutor | $20,000 |
| Youth Community Service Inc | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $210k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
63 repeat relationships — 63 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SCSouth County Community Health Center Inc dba Ravenswood Family Health Center2× · 2023–2024 · $85k · revenue +26%
- SStarVista2× · 2023–2024 · $70k · revenue +7%
- LPLITERACY PARTNERS - MENLO PARK2× · 2023–2024 · $70k · revenue +84%
Funded once
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
PPS-SF's mission is to promote the fundamental value of public education and pursue the success of every public school by sharing knowledge, bridging communities, and informing policy.
Institute for Human and Social Development provides excellent comprehensive child development and family support services through center based family child care and home visiting to the highest need children of 0-5 years old and their…
By advocating for quality early care and education, empowering families with information and financial support, and building the capabilities of educators, Children's Council of San Francisco ensures that every child in San Francisco has…
Coastside childrens programs (ccp) mission is to provide a safe and caring environment where children learn through experience, play, and friendships - building a foundation for success in school and life. ccp is offering preschool…
We help children discover a way of dealing with life that is realistic, comfortable, and satisfying. Self-confidence is nurtured as children learn to rely on themselves and each other. The noncompetitive environment is one that allows each…
Los Altos Chinese School Childrens Center offers a year-round, full-day, bilingual program for preschool students (3 to 5 years old) in the Los Altos area.
Kiddie Kampus is a cooperative, play-based preschool located in Alameda for children ages 2 years 9 months to 5 years old. We work together to create a nurturing, engaging preschool environment that prepares our children for kindergarten…
Who we are - silicon valley education foundation (svef) focuses on raising student performance in the critical areas of math and science across all 33 santa clara county school districts, and also adjoining san mateo and alameda counties.…
Our Mission is to develop and strengthen the power of Latinas to advance our collective success through sisterhood, leadership, and civic engagement.
Folsom Prep Academy is renowned for providing academic excellence in K-5 grade levels while also developing necessary leadership and life skills in our students. Using an enriched and diverse curriculum, our teachers place personalized…
The California School-Age Consortium (CalSAC) builds professional networks that provide training, leadership development and advocacy to ensure that all young people have access to high quality out-of-school time programs and to create a…
Telegraph Hill Neighborhood Center's mission is to provide opportunities for the individuals and families in the North Beach, Chinatown,Fisherman's wharf and Mission Bay neighborhoods to enrich their quality of life.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Epacenter and the most unlike its peers is Palo Alto Friends Nursery School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
60 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 60 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Silicon Valley Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds South County Community Health Center Inc dba Ravenswood Family Health Center ↗
- Who funds StarVista ↗
- Who funds LITERACY PARTNERS - MENLO PARK ↗
- Who funds ECUMENICAL HUNGER PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY ↗
- Who funds Upward Scholars ↗
- Who funds LIFEMOVES ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA ↗
- Who funds PALO ALTO COMMUNITY CHILD CARE ↗
- Who funds EAST PALO ALTO TENNIS & TUTORING ↗
- Who funds Pursuit Of Excellence ↗
- Who funds YOUTH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Ada's Cafe ↗
- Who funds EPACENTER ↗
- Who funds Dream Catchers Inc ↗
- Who funds WEHOPE ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR A COLLEGE EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds COUNSELING AND SUPPORT SERVICES FOR YOUTH ↗
- Who funds RAVENSWOOD CLASSROOM PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds EAST PALO ALTO KIDS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Downtown Streets Inc ↗
- Who funds KARA ↗
- Who funds PENINSULA VOLUNTEERS INC ↗
- Who funds PALO ALTO PLAYERS PENINSULA CENTER STAGE ↗
- Who funds RISE TOGETHER EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE CIRCUIT EPA ↗
- Who funds Learning Home Volunteers ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE PALO ALTO JUNIOR MUSEUM & ZOO ↗
- Who funds PENINSULA HEALTHCARE CONNECTION INC ↗
- Who funds Acterra Action for a Healthy Planet ↗
- Who funds PALO ALTO ART CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Nuestra Casa de East Palo Alto ↗
- Who funds Hopes Corner Inc ↗
- Who funds TRUST FOR HIDDEN VILLA ↗
- Who funds Vista Center for the Blind and Visually Impaired ↗
- Who funds Silicon Valley Urban Debate League ↗
- Who funds EAST PALO ALTO ACADEMY FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Palo Alto Community Fund · Atkinson Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Philanthropic Ventures Foundation · Los Altos Mountain View Community Foundation · Gordon E and Betty I Moore Foundation · Sand Hill Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · The Sobrato Family Foundation · Palo Alto Rotary Club Annual Charities Inc · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · John and Marcia Goldman Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Embarcadero Media Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Embarcadero Media Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Embarcadero Media Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.