How much did MITER CHARITABLE FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 69% of MITER CHARITABLE FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

exp gratzhegins outreachfloodinggratz outreachops outreachexp outreachissues gratz

2019

medical-hegins outreachmedical-gratz outreachmedical-tx outreachops outreachmedical-ops outreachwiestfire-gratz outreach

2020

tm-medical outreachreverse gjegje xferxfer chkchk voidedtm-medical heginspena

2021

combatkyliehonormikaylafestivalteensbehalf

2022

shootplayground equipmentroadclayhumanechildhood cancergirls

2023

food insecuritiesagainst foodrbrphysicalclean portlandptsdcomfort

2024

against foodfood insecuritiesavawilliamsimpactabigailscales

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 272 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k232 grants · $472k
$10k–50k32 grants · $431k
$50k–250k7 grants · $763k
$250k+1 grant · $257k

$1,200

Median grant

States reached

$15M

Total assets

Largest grants

FOUR DIAMONDS$257,260
VARIOUS INDIVIDUALS$236,194
PHOENIX CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$177,350
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES$123,766
NATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC$68,500
SUPPORT THE ENLISTED PROJECT$57,000
SIMON'S HEART$50,500
AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION$50,000
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION$40,000
CHILDREN'S FLIGHT OF HOPE$25,000
VARIOUS ASSISTANCE FUNDS$23,456
THE INVINCIBLE FOUNDATION$20,000
TEAM RED WHITE AND BLUE INC$20,000
THE VICTORY FOUNDATION$16,700
HEGINS VALLEY FIRE RESCUE$15,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $80k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 10%. 63% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$7.3M · 222 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

222 repeat relationships — 110 still active in FY2024, 112 since wound down; 162 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

222

772

Total granted

$7.3M

$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%

+59%

Still filing today

27%

10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $407k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthPublic BenefitPublic Safety & DisasterPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

PC
PHOENIX CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
5× · 2019–2024 · $944k · revenue +64%
WW
WINDOW WORLD CARES
4× · 2018–2023 · $454k · revenue +57%
RM
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES
2× · 2023–2024 · $252k · revenue +95%

Funded once

PC
PHOENIX CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDAT
one grant, 2020 · $61k
NB
NATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION I
one grant, 2020 · $30k
EE
EXPEDITIONARY EXPERIENCE LLC
one grant, 2023 · $30k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Homes for Heroes Foundation

Housing & Shelter

Companions for Heroes

To champion public awareness of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and challenges confronting our countrys heroes and rally support for shelter animal adoption by connecting heroes and companions.

Human Services

Heroes for Children

Heroes for children advocates for and provides financial and social assistance to families with children (0-22 years of age) who are battling cancer.

—

Children's Cancer Family Foundation of

Raise money to support families and children suffering from childhood cancer.

Health

Families of the Wounded Fund Inc

Families of the wounded fund, inc (fotwf) provides financial assistance to families of service members or us agents who were wounded in combat or injured in support of combat operations while the wounded receive treatment at various…

Human Services

Wyoming Foundation for Cancer Care Inc

Easing the burden for wyoming cancer patients and their families.

Human Services

Patriots and Paws

Patriots and Paws help veterans and their families with furniture and small necessities needed, and provides them with a small animal for companion.

Human Services

Firefighters for Healing

Support burn and trauma survivors through direct emotional and financial support.

Philanthropy

Arizona Cancer Foundation for Children

Arizona Cancer Foundation for Children provides social, emotional, and financial support to families managing the health and well-being of a loved one with pediatric cancer.

Public Benefit

Teddy Bear Cancer Foundation

Teddy Bear Cancer Foundation is a non-profit organization that provides financial and emotional support to families of children who have cancer living in Santa Barbara, Ventura, and San Luis Obispo counties.

Health

Healing Paws for Warriors Inc

Healing paws for warriors is a local veteran found / veteran led 501(c)(3) that provides rescue to trained service dogs to veterans faced with post traumatic stress disorder (ptsd), traumatic brain injury (tbi) and/or military sexual…

Human Services

San Francisco Fire Fighters Cancer

SFFCPF is committed to the prevention and early detection of cancer for active and retired members of the San Francisco Fire Department and their families.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc and the most unlike its peers is T-Town Rocks Music Festival. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 16 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.5% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.5%1/206

the rest of the field

11%

206,163/1,819,359

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

179 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

172/179

Grantees still filing

145/179

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$6,240,146Health$1,491,636Philanthropy$479,101Public Safety & Disaster$350,220Public Benefit$190,560Human Services$83,276Housing & Shelter$76,800

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.

The Foundation for Enhancing CommunitiesPA31.3× affinity15 shared granteesties to 6 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Foundation for Enhancing Communities · United Way of the Capital Region · Harold N and Thelma G Lenker · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Margaret T Morris Foundation · Rite Aid Healthy Futures · Kilworth Florence Char Tr Fndn · Fuchsg & M Fdn Tai · The Bamford Foundation · Greater Tacoma Community Foundation · Kenneth Bankert Foundation Inc · John Crain Kunkel Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation MITER CHARITABLE FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

10get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: PEOPLE WHO CARE.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

high risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, no recent filing.

Legal standing

medium risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 232990366 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on PEOPLE WHO CARE, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
FlagSustained operations— No recent filing on record.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 17% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Miter Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Miter Charitable Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

MITER CHARITABLE FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

179 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Miter Charitable Foundation?

More from the funding graph

MITER CHARITABLE FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

179 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Miter Charitable Foundation?

More from the funding graph