Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Methodist Hospitals of Dallas

The primary mission or purpose of methodist health system is to serve people in defined service areas by meeting their health needs effectively and in a manner that reflects a "commitment to the christian concepts of life and learning" as defined in the covenant between methodist health system and the north texas conference of the united…

$85M
Granted FY2024still arriving
60
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$46M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$315MCommunity Improvement$1.1MEducation$831kPublic Benefit$444kArts & Culture$156kRecreation & Sports$115kPhilanthropy$110kReligion$109kOther$0
02FY2024 · 60 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 60 grants below total $82,122,445 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $85,228,379 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $3,105,934 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k22 grants · $156k
  • $10k–50k31 grants · $509k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
  • $250k+5 grants · $81M
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.8B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DALLAS COUNTY INDIGENT CARE$46,234,847
TARRANT COUNTY INDIGENT CARE$21,497,953
DALLAS SAFETY NET SUPPORT CORPORATION$10,267,675
Ellis County Local Provider Participation Fund$2,322,704
TARRANT SAFETY NET SUPPORT CORPORATION$984,397
Southern Gateway Public Green Foundation$100,000
City of Richardson$50,000
Midlothian ISD$45,000
Salesmanship Club$33,000
Richardson Chamber of Commerce$28,565
City of Celina$26,000
Southlake Women's Club Foundation$25,000
Dallas Regional Chamber$23,000
GO OAK CLIFF$23,000
DALLASITES101$21,999
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $136k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 41% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%TIPSTexas Indo American Physician Society: $10k → 16%North Texas Snap INC: $10k → 11%ROSA ES ROJO: $10k → 5%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC: $6k → 14%Mental Health Connection of Tarrant County: $10k → 11%Mental Health Connection: $10k → 11%Dallas Metropolitan YMCA: $6k → 14%Mental Health Connection: $10k → 11%Mental Health Connection of Tarrant County: $10k → 11%Mental Health Connection of Tarrant County: $10k → 11%YMCA of Metropolitan Dallas: $5k → 14%Mental Health Connection: $10k → 11%YMCA of Metropolitan Dallas: $5k → 14%Dallas Childrens Advocacy Center: $10k → 14%Dallas Childrens Advocacy Center: $10k → 14%Dash for the Beads: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$317M · 81 repeat orgs$609k to everyone else

81 repeat relationships — 46 still active in FY2024, 35 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

81
35

Total granted

$317M
$365k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+14%

Still filing today

70%
49%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $245k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Community ImprovementEducationHealthHuman ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DS
    DALLAS SAFETY NET SUPPORT CORPORATION
    7× · 2018–2024 · $115M · revenue +207% · 44% of their budget
  • TS
    TARRANT SAFETY NET SUPPORT CORPORATION
    7× · 2018–2024 · $12M · revenue +897%
  • SC
    Salesmanship Club of Dallas
    5× · 2017–2024 · $137k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • MF
    Mansfield Fire Department
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • DC
    DALLAS COUNTY MEDICAL SOCIETY
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +18%
  • MI
    MANSFIELD ISD
    one grant, 2020 · $24k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Downtown Dallas Inc Foundation

Downtown Dallas, Inc. Foundation is the charitable arm of Downtown Dallas, Inc. whose purpose is to help make the area in and around Downtown Dallas a more vibrant and livable place for both daytime and permanent residents by promoting the…

Community Improvement
2
Greater Dallas Momentum Foundation
Community Improvement
3
Dallas Black Chamber of Commerce

To serve as an advocate for the creation, growth, and general welfare of African-Americanbusinesses in the greate Dallas area. The Chamber focuses on economic and businessdevelopment, education, and special projects.

—
4
Denton Chamber of Commerce

Promote Denton, Texas Community

—
5
Young Texans Against Cancer Dallas

Young Texans Against Cancer is a network of motivated young professionals collectively working together to raise awareness and funds to support the local Dallas cancer community. The Dallas chapter was established in 2007, as part of a…

—
6
Downtown Dallas Inc

Downtown Dallas, Inc. (DDI), is the champion of a clean and safe Downtown and of the economic development and vibrancy of this community of diverse, unique neighborhoods. DDI: Mobilizes and amplifies the services of public agencies.…

—
7
Mansfield Area Chamber of Commerce

Description of the organization's mission - The Mansfield Area Chamber of Commerce conducts networking gatherings, is involved in other community events, and develops business education programs to encourage business and community growth…

—
8
North Texas Gay Lesbian Bisexual Transgender Chamber of Commerce Inc

The North Texas GLBT Chamber of Commerce works to achieve equality through business.

Community Improvement
9
Fort Worth Chamber of Commerce

To act as the voice of business, articulating a business perspective and advocating policies supported by the fort worth general business community.

—
10
Greater Austin Chamber of Commerce

The Chamber's mission is to provide leadership that facilitates the creation of a prosperous regional economy and results in effective advocacy for its members.

—
11
Texas Chamber of Commerce Executives

To enhance the professional growth of chamber professionals.

—
12
Corsicana Area Chamber of Commerce

To promote Corsicana and the surrounding area.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Dallas Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Kessler School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyDallas Parks and Cultural V…Regional Business ChambersFamily Support & AdvocacyYouth Sports ProgramsCivic Fraternal Organizatio…Performing Arts Organizatio…High School Music BoostersFaith-Based Charitable Foun…Affordable Housing Developm…Faith-Based Private SchoolsHospital Health Systems
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number28%3%<5yr17%12%5–10yr19%17%10–20yr15%27%20–35yr8%13%35–55yr13%28%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value28%0%<5yr17%46%5–10yr19%53%10–20yr15%0%20–35yr8%0%35–55yr13%0%55yr+

The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%3/130
the rest of the field
17%
5,091/30,293

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

92 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 92 of the 131 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
84/92
Grantees still filing
48/92
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Dallas County Indigent Care — $148,293,669 · HealthDallas County Indigent CareDALLAS SAFETY NET SUPPORT CORPORATION — $114,649,152 · HealthDALLAS SAFETY NET SUPPORT CORPORATIONTARRANT SAFETY NET SUPPORT CORPORATION — $12,488,355 · Health+8 more — $138,293 · HealthTarrant County Indigent Care corporation — $35,338,191 · OtherTarrant County…Ellis County Local Provider Participation Fund — $3,667,223 · OtherEllis County L…+78 more — $2,157,867 · OtherSalesmanship Club of Dallas — $137,000 · Community ImprovementSOUTHERN GATEWAY PUBLIC GREEN FOUNDATION — $100,000 · Community ImprovementDALLAS MOMENTUM INC — $32,500 · Community ImprovementDesoto Area Chamber — $28,000 · Community ImprovementTEXAS ASSOCIATION OF VOLUNTARY HOSPITALS — $26,376 · Community ImprovementMIDLOTHIAN DOWNTOWN BUSINESS ASSOCI — $24,000 · Community ImprovementTrinity Park Conservancy — $15,000 · Community ImprovementJUNIOR LEAGUE OF DALLAS INC — $15,000 · Community Improvement+5 more — $46,150 · Community ImprovementARMSTRONG BRADFIELD PRESCHOOL ASSOCIATION — $90,000 · EducationMIDLOTHIAN ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $80,000 · EducationPTA TEXAS CONGRESS — $40,780 · EducationWYLIE ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $29,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY PARK SCHOOL PARENT-TEACHER ASSOCIATION — $26,650 · EducationCEDAR HILL ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $22,600 · EducationThe Kessler School — $20,000 · EducationRICHARDSON EAST ROTARY FOUNDATION — $15,000 · Education+4 more — $35,850 · EducationMANSFIELD ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $116,100 · PhilanthropySOUTHLAKE WOMEN'S CLUB FOUNDATION — $60,000 · PhilanthropyDuncanville ISD Education Foundation — $49,000 · PhilanthropyTHE DALLAS FOUNDATION — $20,000 · PhilanthropyMENTAL HEALTH CONNECTION TARRANT CT — $60,000 · Human ServicesDash for the Beads — $30,500 · Human ServicesYMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC — $21,250 · Human ServicesDALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER — $20,000 · Human ServicesNORTH TEXAS SNAP INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesROSA ES ROJO INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesTEXAS INDO-AMERICAN PHYSICIANS SOCIETY SW CHAPTER — $10,000 · Human ServicesDALLAS SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION — $54,500 · Arts & CultureOAK CLIFF FILM SOCIETY — $32,500 · Arts & CulturePRESERVATION PARK CITIES — $20,000 · Arts & CultureRICHARDSON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA GUILD INC — $5,500 · Arts & Culture
Health$275,569,469Other$41,163,281Community Improvement$424,026Education$360,380Philanthropy$245,100Human Services$161,750Arts & Culture$112,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDallas County Indigent Care — $148,293,669 over 8y, 20% of budgetDALLAS SAFETY NET SUPPORT CORPORATION — $114,649,152 over 7y, 44% of budgetTarrant County Indigent Care corporation — $35,338,191 over 6y, 6.7% of budgetTARRANT SAFETY NET SUPPORT CORPORATION — $12,488,355 over 7y, 17% of budgetSalesmanship Club of Dallas — $137,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetRichardson Chamber of Commerce — $133,272 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetMANSFIELD ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $116,100 over 8y, 4.8% of budgetSOUTHERN GATEWAY PUBLIC GREEN FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetARMSTRONG BRADFIELD PRESCHOOL ASSOCIATION — $90,000 over 8y, 18% of budgetDallas Regional Chamber — $87,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTHLAKE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $83,602 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetOAK CLIFF CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $83,500 over 7y, 8.9% of budgetMIDLOTHIAN ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $80,000 over 4y, 35% of budgetMidlothian Chamber of Commerce — $62,275 over 4y, 6.9% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH CONNECTION TARRANT CT — $60,000 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetSOUTHLAKE WOMEN'S CLUB FOUNDATION — $60,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetMANSFIELD MISSON CENTER INC — $56,210 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetDALLAS SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION — $54,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDuncanville ISD Education Foundation — $49,000 over 3y, 30% of budgetCedar Hill Chamber of Commerce — $46,020 over 4y, 8.2% of budgetDALLAS CITIZENS COUNCIL — $43,750 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetWYLIE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $43,610 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetDUNCANVILLE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $41,675 over 6y, 5.1% of budgetMansfield Invitational Inc — $40,970 over 3y, 38% of budgetPTA TEXAS CONGRESS — $40,780 over 4y, 9.6% of budgetRISD EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $35,750 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetOAK CLIFF FILM SOCIETY — $32,500 over 3y, 12% of budgetDALLAS MOMENTUM INC — $32,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetBEST SOUTHWEST CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $31,300 over 3y, 10% of budgetDash for the Beads — $30,500 over 4y, 26% of budgetWYLIE ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $29,500 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER DALLAS INC — $28,100 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDesoto Area Chamber — $28,000 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetDALLAS ZOO MANAGEMENT INC — $27,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY PARK SCHOOL PARENT-TEACHER ASSOCIATION — $26,650 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetTEXAS ASSOCIATION OF VOLUNTARY HOSPITALS — $26,376 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetMAMMOGRAM POSTER GIRLS INC — $25,500 over 3y, 17% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS COUNTY MEDICAL SOCIETY — $25,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHE WARREN CENTER INC — $25,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetDallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council — $24,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCEDAR HILL ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $22,600 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetCOLLEYVILLE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $21,600 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetYMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC — $21,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Kessler School — $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWEST TRANSPLANT ALLIANCE INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH OAK CLIFF GREENSPACE — $20,000 over 2y, 41% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Dallas County Indigent Care ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS SAFETY NET SUPPORT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Tarrant County Indigent Care corporation ↗
  • Who funds TARRANT SAFETY NET SUPPORT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Salesmanship Club of Dallas ↗
  • Who funds Richardson Chamber of Commerce ↗
  • Who funds MANSFIELD ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN GATEWAY PUBLIC GREEN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ARMSTRONG BRADFIELD PRESCHOOL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Dallas Regional Chamber ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHLAKE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds OAK CLIFF CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds MIDLOTHIAN ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Midlothian Chamber of Commerce ↗
  • Who funds MENTAL HEALTH CONNECTION TARRANT CT ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHLAKE WOMEN'S CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MANSFIELD MISSON CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Duncanville ISD Education Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Cedar Hill Chamber of Commerce ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS CITIZENS COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds WYLIE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds DUNCANVILLE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds Mansfield Invitational Inc ↗
  • Who funds PTA TEXAS CONGRESS ↗
  • Who funds RISD EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OAK CLIFF FILM SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS MOMENTUM INC ↗
  • Who funds BEST SOUTHWEST CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds Dash for the Beads ↗
  • Who funds WYLIE ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER DALLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds Desoto Area Chamber ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundatio…Community Foundation …The Dallas FoundationHoblitzelle FoundationNorth Central Texas T…Texas Instruments Fou…Hillcrest FoundationUnited Way of Metropo…Texas Women's Foundat…Texas Trust GivesTrusted World Foundat…Texas Health Hospital…
Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX35.5× affinity32 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · The Dallas Foundation · Hoblitzelle Foundation · North Central Texas Trauma Regional Advisory Council · Texas Instruments Foundation · Hillcrest Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · Texas Women's Foundation · Texas Trust Gives · Trusted World Foundation Inc · Texas Health Hospital Mansfield

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Methodist Hospitals of Dallas funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 131 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines