How much did Methodist Hospitals of Dallas grant in FY2024?

Health$246MCommunity Improvement$361kEducation$335kPhilanthropy$206kHuman Services$132kArts & Culture$104kReligion$56kRecreation & Sports$51kYouth Development$28kOther$38M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

richardson symphonysymphony orchestrafemalevoicesmeeting criticalcritical investinginvesting breakthrough

2020

parkssystemmakeenvironmenteconomic growthchamber commercegreater

2021

elementaryenablewylierichardsoncitizenspromotionactivities

2022

valueincomechronicrosa rojorojo supervivehispanic womenlanguage

2023

physiciansit'spatientsactionpatientdallas-fort worthzoo

2024

celinasafetyathleticlakeuninsuredcomprehensiveolder

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 60 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k22 grants · $156k
$10k–50k31 grants · $509k
$50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$250k+5 grants · $81M

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$3.8B

Total assets

Largest grants

DALLAS COUNTY INDIGENT CARE$46,234,847
TARRANT COUNTY INDIGENT CARE$21,497,953
DALLAS SAFETY NET SUPPORT CORPORATION$10,267,675
Ellis County Local Provider Participation Fund$2,322,704
TARRANT SAFETY NET SUPPORT CORPORATION$984,397
Southern Gateway Public Green Foundation$100,000
City of Richardson$50,000
Midlothian ISD$45,000
Salesmanship Club$33,000
Richardson Chamber of Commerce$28,565
City of Celina$26,000
Southlake Women's Club Foundation$25,000
Dallas Regional Chamber$23,000
GO OAK CLIFF$23,000
DALLASITES101$21,999

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $106k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 11%. 34% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$284M · 71 repeat orgs$686k to everyone else

71 repeat relationships — 46 still active in FY2024, 25 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$284M

$441k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%

+22%

Still filing today

70%

55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $245k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationCommunity ImprovementHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

DS
Dallas safety net support corporation
7× · 2018–2024 · $115M · revenue +207% · 44% of their budget
TS
Tarrant safety net support corporation
7× · 2018–2024 · $12M · revenue +897%
SC
Salesmanship Club of Dallas
4× · 2021–2024 · $113k · revenue +23%

Funded once

CO
CITY OF MANSFIELD
one grant, 2020 · $25k
DC
Dallas County Medical Society
one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +22%
MI
MANSFIELD ISD
one grant, 2020 · $24k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Downtown Dallas Inc Foundation

Downtown Dallas, Inc. Foundation is the charitable arm of Downtown Dallas, Inc. whose purpose is to help make the area in and around Downtown Dallas a more vibrant and livable place for both daytime and permanent residents by promoting the…

Community Improvement

Dallas Black Chamber of Commerce

To serve as an advocate for the creation, growth, and general welfare of African-Americanbusinesses in the greate Dallas area. The Chamber focuses on economic and businessdevelopment, education, and special projects.

—

Downtown Dallas Parks Conservancy

Community Improvement

Denton Chamber of Commerce

Promote Denton, Texas Community

—

Greater Austin Chamber of Commerce

The Chamber's mission is to provide leadership that facilitates the creation of a prosperous regional economy and results in effective advocacy for its members.

—

Frisco Chamber of Commerce

To protect and promote commerce through advocacy, resources, and connections.

—

Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas

A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.

Health

Texas Chamber of Commerce Executives

To enhance the professional growth of chamber professionals.

—

Fort Worth Chamber of Commerce

It is the mission of the fort worth chamber of commerce to bring the fort worth region together to identify issues, solve problems and help align resources, resulting in a stronger business climate and greater economic prosperity for all.

—

Greater Dallas Momentum Foundation

Community Improvement

Cleburne Chamber of Commerce

Promotion of trade and commerce in the city of cleburne, texas.

—

Texas Association of Business

As the state chamber of commerce, texas association of business (tab) is the most influential and dominant voice for public policy issues affecting business in texas. through proven results-oriented advocacy and member services, tab…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Dallas Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

2%3/128

the rest of the field

14%

4,321/30,295

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

90 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

83/90

Grantees still filing

56/90

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Health$246,054,228Other$37,687,702Community Improvement$361,026Education$335,380Philanthropy$205,600Human Services$131,750Arts & Culture$103,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dallas FoundationTX33.2× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dallas Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Hoblitzelle Foundation · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · Hillcrest Foundation · Texas Women's Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · North Central Texas Trauma Regional · Theodore and Beulah Beasley Foundation · Trusted World Foundation Inc · Roy and Christine Sturgis Charitable And

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation Methodist Hospitals of Dallas funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Dallas safety net support corporation.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~1 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 3.1× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 823131059 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on Dallas safety net support corporation, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 1 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 44% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Methodist Hospitals of Dallas?

Find your warmest path to Methodist Hospitals of Dallas through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

Methodist Hospitals of Dallas

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

90 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Methodist Hospitals of Dallas?

More from the funding graph

Methodist Hospitals of Dallas

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

90 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Methodist Hospitals of Dallas?

More from the funding graph