Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Texas Health Hospital Mansfield

Our mission is to extend the healing ministry of Christ by identifying and meeting the health needs of our community, providing quality, costumer oriented, and cost effective services, and ensuring access to those services.

$83k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Education$68kReligion$56kFood & Nutrition$18kPhilanthropy$8kCommunity Improvement$6kHuman Services$5k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 6 grants below total $43,029 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $83,068 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $40,039 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$6,029
Median grant
2
States reached
$156M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Common Ground Network Inc$15,000
Marine Toys for Tots Foundation$7,500
Mansfield Mission Center Inc$6,029
Pantego Christian Academy Inc$6,000
Mansfield Area Chamber of Commerce$5,500
Harvesting International Ministry Center Inc dba HIM Food Bank$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Common Ground Network Inc: $15k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

49%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$79k · 3 repeat orgs$81k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +5% since the first grant, against -33% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
2

Total granted

$79k
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
-33%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 28% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’23’24
PhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementEducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MI
    MANSFIELD ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    3× · 2020–2023 · $44k · revenue -9%
  • PC
    PANTEGO CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $24k · revenue +5%
  • MM
    MANSFIELD MISSON CENTER INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $11k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • TC
    TEXAS CONFERENCE OF SEVENTH DAY ADVENTISTS
    one grant, 2020 · $45k
  • MC
    MANSFIELD CARES INC
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -33%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mansfield Cares Inc

Mansfield cares, a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization, is the philanthropic arm of mansfield energy that actively supports a broad range of charitable organizations across north america.

Human Services
2
Mansfield Cancer Foundation

The mansfield cancer foundation, inc. provides cancer screenings, detection services, and financial assistance to richland county individuals who require cancer treatment and have a financial need.

3
Manna University

Manna University is a biblical higher education institution dedicated to educating, equipping, and empowering emerging leaders to change the world.

Education
4
Mesquite Isd Education Foundation Inc

To create and sustain a visionary coalition of businesses and citizens generating investments and funding for innovative programs and initiatives that enrich edcuational opportunities in Mesquite ISD.

Philanthropy
5
Manistee Catholic Central Schools Founda

Cost incurred in fundraising to establish foundation for which we have formed. contributions for manistee catholic central school and ludington area catholic school per our bylaws and exempt purpose.

Education
6
Minnies Food Pantry Inc

Minnies Food Pantry is a 501c3 non-profit organization with a mission to provide healthy meals, educational resources and red-carpet treatment to every person that we serve. Minnies Food Pantry understands that hunger does not discriminate…

Food & Nutrition
7
Marfa Education Foundation Inc

The foundation supports and enhances the work of the marfa independent school district, and is committed to facilitating enrichment projects and to augmenting the education of the district's students, as well as supporting the education of…

Education
8
Manna Christian Fellowship

Promote Christian fellowship and learning

Religion
9
Food Bank of West Central Texas

To procure and distribute nutritional food to qualified agencies that feed the hungry of West Central Texas.

Food & Nutrition
10
Montgomery County Community Foundation

The mission of the Montgomery County Community Foundation (MCCF) is to provide leadership in Montgomery County by directing sustainable financial resources that strengthen our community and improve the quality of life for current and…

Philanthropy
11
West Texas Food Bank

The WTFB exists to collect, purchase, and distribute food to feed the hungry in 19 counties in West Texas in partnership with volunteers and community organizations and to educate these partners and the public at large about the real face…

12
Willis Independent School District Education Foundation

The mission is to promote education excellence and opportunity beyond the scope of the Willis School system by generating financial resources to provide support.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mansfield Isd Education Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Him Food Bank Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MANSFIELD ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $43,500 · PhilanthropyMANSFIELD ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATIONMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $7,500 · PhilanthropyMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATIONTEXAS CONFERENCE OF SEVENTH DAY ADVENTISTS — $45,000 · OtherTEXAS CONFERENCE OF SEVENTH DAY ADV…Mansfield Area Chamber of Commerce — $5,500 · OtherMansfield Area Chamber of CommercePANTEGO CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC — $24,000 · EducationPANTEGO CHRISTIA…COMMON GROUND NETWORK INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesCOMMON GRO…MANSFIELD MISSON CENTER INC — $11,329 · ReligionMANSFIELD CARES INC — $5,200 · Community ImprovementHIM Food Bank Inc — $3,000 · Food & Nutrition
Philanthropy$51,000Other$50,500Education$24,000Human Services$15,000Religion$11,329Community Improvement$5,200Food & Nutrition$3,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMANSFIELD ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $43,500 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetPANTEGO CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC — $24,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMON GROUND NETWORK INC — $15,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetMANSFIELD MISSON CENTER INC — $11,329 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMansfield Area Chamber of Commerce — $5,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetMANSFIELD CARES INC — $5,200 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetHIM Food Bank Inc — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX14.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Mansfield Cares Inc · Methodist Hospitals of Dallas · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Texas Health Hospital Mansfield funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Texas Health Hospital Mansfield?

    Find your warmest path to Texas Health Hospital Mansfield through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph