How much did TEXAS TRUST GIVES grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 65% of TEXAS TRUST GIVES’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

—

2021

cancer

2022

toys christmasless fortunatefortunate childrencancerdistrict

2023

studentselementaryskillsreality fairfair kithillliteracy

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 60 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k47 grants · $148k
$10k–50k13 grants · $167k

$4,000

Median grant

States reached

$1.9M

Total assets

Largest grants

UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS$20,000
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON$20,000
GRAND PRAIRIE ISD$14,928
ARLINGTON ISD$13,950
ARLINGTON ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION$12,650
ARLINGTON ISD$12,000
DESOTO ISD$11,650
MANSFIELD ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION$11,216
GRAND PRAIRIE ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION$10,487
CEDAR HILL ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION$10,000
PAUL QUINN COLLEGE$10,000
MANSFIELD ISD$10,000
MISSION ARLINGTON$10,000
MANSFIELD ISD$9,032
SAN ANGELO SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$8,784

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 11%. 76% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

46%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$284k · 11 repeat orgs$337k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +86% since the first grant, against +64% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 45 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$284k

$74k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+86%

+64%

Still filing today

73%

38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 16% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $263k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationPhilanthropyHealthFood & NutritionReligionPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

NT
NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK
3× · 2020–2022 · $43k · revenue +49%
AS
ARLINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT
3× · 2022–2024 · $34k · revenue +282%
TF
TOYS FOR TOTS
2× · 2022–2023 · $25k · revenue +86%

Funded once

AI
ARLINGTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
one grant, 2023 · $13k
CH
CEDAR HILL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
one grant, 2023 · $13k
DS
DESOTO SCHOOL DISTRICT
one grant, 2022 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Houston Independent School District

The HISD Foundation supports Houston Independent School District's schools and programs.

—

Greenwood Isd Education Foundation

Generate and distribute resources to GISD students and employees to enrich, maintain, and expand opportunities for pursuing excellence in education.

Education

Marble Falls Isd Education Foundation

To provide resources for excellence, promote innovation in teaching, inspire learning and partner with the community to enrich the quality of education for every student.

Education

Mesquite Isd Education Foundation Inc

To create and sustain a visionary coalition of businesses and citizens generating investments and funding for innovative programs and initiatives that enrich edcuational opportunities in Mesquite ISD.

Philanthropy

Denison Isd Education Foundation

The foundation (1) awards grants for administrators compensation (2) administers student scholarships (3) awards innovative teaching grants to the professional staff of the disd (4) honors students at award banquets.

Education

Rockwall Isd Education Foundation Inc

The mission of the Rockwall ISD Education Foundation is to provide learning enhancement experiences for the students in Rockwall Independent School District and to provide what is otherwise not possible due to the District's limited…

—

Pasadena Isd Education Foundation

The mission of the pasadena isd education foundation is to collaborate with the school district and community to reward innovative teaching, promote educational excellence, and provide opportunities to recognize the students and staff of…

Education

Goliad Isd Education Foundation in

The foundation provides resources to enrich teaching, inspire learning and enhance opportunities to meet the stated mission of excellence in education for all students enrolled in the goliad independent school district

Education

Education Foundation of Canyon Isd

To generate and distribute resources to provide enhancements for excellence in education to Canyon ISD, its students and staff.

Education

Forney Isd Education Leadership

The Forney ISD Education Leadership Foundation's mission is to provide opportunities for excellence in education, promote innovation in teaching, and partner with the community to enhance the quality of education for all students.The…

Education

Texarkana Isd Education Foundation

The texarkana isd education foundation's mission is to provide opportunities for excellence in education, promote innovation in teaching, and partner witht the community to enhance the quality of education for all students.

Education

Pearland Isd Education Foundation

It is the mission of the pearland isd education foundation to provide resources to enrich teaching, inspire learning and enhance opportunities for students enrolled in the pearland independent school district.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Irving Schools Foundation and the most unlike its peers is American Cancer Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/33

the rest of the field

13%

17,176/136,771

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

23 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

23/23

Grantees still filing

18/23

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$405,890Philanthropy$96,366Education$95,987Health$18,410Food & Nutrition$2,000Religion$1,500Public Benefit$493

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX21.3× affinity9 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Methodist Hospitals of Dallas · GenYOUTH Incorporated · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation TEXAS TRUST GIVES funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 751234898 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 51% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Texas Trust Gives?

Find your warmest path to Texas Trust Gives through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

TEXAS TRUST GIVES

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

23 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Texas Trust Gives?

More from the funding graph

TEXAS TRUST GIVES

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

23 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Texas Trust Gives?

More from the funding graph