Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Texas Trust Gives

INVEST IN OUR COMMUNITIES TO BUILD BRIGHTER FINANCIAL FUTURES.

$316k
Granted FY2024still arriving
61
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Education$426kFood & Nutrition$67kPhilanthropy$36kHuman Services$30kHealth$29kYouth Development$18kReligion$10kEmployment$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 61 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k48 grants · $149k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $167k
$3,500
Median grant
8
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON$20,000
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS$20,000
GRAND PRAIRIE ISD$14,928
ARLINGTON ISD$13,950
ARLINGTON ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION$12,650
ARLINGTON ISD$12,000
DESOTO ISD$11,650
MANSFIELD ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION$11,216
GRAND PRAIRIE ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION$10,487
MANSFIELD ISD$10,000
MISSION ARLINGTON$10,000
CEDAR HILL ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION$10,000
PAUL QUINN COLLEGE$10,000
MANSFIELD ISD$9,032
SAN ANGELO SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$8,784
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HENDERSON COUNTY HOMELESS MINISTRY LOVE IN ACTION: $999 → 13%ARLINGTON-MANSFIELD AREA YMCA: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
IL
CA
KY
VA
OK
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 7% of Texas Trust Gives’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 89% of the giving stays in TX; read by stated purpose it is 86% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Texas Trust Giveslessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.4% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

49%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$306k · 12 repeat orgs$315k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 43 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
7

Total granted

$306k
$67k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+182%

Still filing today

75%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 21% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $248k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationPhilanthropyHealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NT
    NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK
    3× · 2020–2022 · $43k · revenue +35%
  • AI
    ARLINGTON ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $34k · revenue +17%
  • MT
    MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2023 · $25k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • AI
    ARLINGTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2023 · $13k
  • CH
    CEDAR HILL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2023 · $13k
  • DI
    DeSoto ISD
    one grant, 2022 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Houston Independent School District Foundation

The HISD Foundation is dedicated to mobilizing the local community to support innovative priorities in HISD to improve outcomes for all students in the district. Our mission is to fund projects and programs of merit that fall outside of…

2
Austin Community College Foundation

Making education accessible for students through philanthropic support, aligned with Austin Community College (ACC) strategic priorities.

Education
3
Central Texas College Foundation

Central texas college foundation (foundation) helps central texas college (ctc) grow through the acquisitions of gifts of scholarships, equipment and other donations, in order to help students, to support the facility, to promote programs,…

Education
4
Texas a&M San Antonio Foundation

To furnish Texas AM University-San Antonio with provisions for future and perpetual financial support for its students to help them succeed during college and in the future as valuable contributing members of the community

Education
5
Texas College

To ensure that the student body experiences balanced intellectual, psychological, social and spiritual development, aimed at enabling them to become active productive members of society where they live and work.

Education
6
Goliad Isd Education Foundation in

The foundation provides resources to enrich teaching, inspire learning and enhance opportunities to meet the stated mission of excellence in education for all students enrolled in the goliad independent school district

Education
7
Texas Christian University

Texas christian university is an institution of higher education which includes nine major academic units: liberal arts, science and engineering, business, education, fine arts, communication, honors, nursing and health sciences, and the…

Education
8
Waco Isd Education Foundation

The waco isd education foundation strives to fund creative, educational programs and projects not covered by school budgets or tax dollars, thus our motto, "raising the power of education!" more than 93% of all foundation expenses fund…

Education
9
Texas Food & Fuel Association Scholarship Foundation

The texas food & fuel association scholarship foundation awards scholarships to outstanding students in the state of texas.

Education
10
Texas State University Development Foundation

To support and further the mission of texas state university through the acceptance and investment of gifts established as endowments benefiting the students, faculty and staff.

Education
11
Midland Isd Education Foundation

The midland education foundation exists to promote excellence in education by generating and distributing additional resources for the benefit of midland isd students and staff.

12
The University of Texas Foundation No 1

To support the university of texas system

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Irving Schools Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Pomona College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number28%3%<5yr17%7%5–10yr19%7%10–20yr15%27%20–35yr9%33%35–55yr12%23%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value28%0%<5yr17%1%5–10yr19%1%10–20yr15%49%20–35yr9%35%35–55yr12%14%55yr+

The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 18% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/40
the rest of the field
18%
7,644/42,630

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
13/28
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK — $42,501 · OtherNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANKGRAND PRAIRIE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT — $41,000 · OtherGRAND PRAIRIE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICTARLINGTON ISD — $25,950 · OtherARLINGTON ISDMANSFIELD ISD — $23,300 · OtherMANSFIELD ISDGRAND PRAIRIE ISD — $22,728 · OtherGRAND PRAIRIE ISDUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON — $22,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTONUNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS — $20,000 · OtherMANSFIELD ISD — $19,032 · OtherIRVING SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $17,500 · OtherLEWISVILLE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT — $16,100 · Other+29 more — $155,187 · Other+29 moreARLINGTON ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $33,650 · PhilanthropyARLINGTON ISD EDU…MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $24,500 · PhilanthropyMARINE TOYS FOR T…MANSFIELD ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $23,216 · PhilanthropyMANSFIELD ISD EDU…HURST-EULESS-BEDFORD ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $9,000 · PhilanthropyHURST-EULESS-BEDF…TARRANT COUNTY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $4,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $2,000 · PhilanthropyGRAND PRAIRIE ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $23,987 · EducationGRAND PRAIRIE I…CEDAR HILL ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $21,000 · EducationCEDAR HILL ISD …Lewisville Education Foundation Inc — $17,563 · EducationLewisville Educ…Paul Quinn College — $10,000 · EducationPaul Quinn Coll…MIDLOTHIAN ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $6,500 · EducationMIDLOTHIAN ISD …+2 more — $5,000 · Education+2 moreAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $22,080 · HealthWI Cook Foundation Inc — $3,500 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $1,500 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc — $1,000 · Health+1 more — $360 · HealthARLINGTON-MANSFIELD AREA YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $1,500 · Human ServicesHenderson County Homeless Ministry — $999 · Human ServicesTASTE PROJECT — $2,000 · Food & NutritionRUST STREET MINISTRIES — $1,500 · ReligionWreaths Across America — $493 · Public Benefit
Other$405,798Philanthropy$96,366Education$84,050Health$28,440Human Services$2,499Food & Nutrition$2,000Religion$1,500Public Benefit$493

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK — $42,501 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetARLINGTON ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $33,650 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $24,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGRAND PRAIRIE ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $23,987 over 2y, 14% of budgetMANSFIELD ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $23,216 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $22,080 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCEDAR HILL ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $21,000 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetLewisville Education Foundation Inc — $17,563 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetIRVING SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $17,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetPaul Quinn College — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHURST-EULESS-BEDFORD ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $9,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetSAN ANGELO SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $8,784 over 1y, 12% of budgetMIDLOTHIAN ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $6,500 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetTHE HOWARD COLLEGE AT SAN ANGELO FOUNDATION — $4,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetTARRANT COUNTY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWI Cook Foundation Inc — $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOMONA COLLEGE — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTASTE PROJECT — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTRINITY VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetARLINGTON-MANSFIELD AREA YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRUST STREET MINISTRIES — $1,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHenderson County Homeless Ministry — $999 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetConcho Valley Regional Food Bank — $655 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWreaths Across America — $493 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetShannon Medical Center — $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK
  • Who funds ARLINGTON ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds GRAND PRAIRIE ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MANSFIELD ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds CEDAR HILL ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Lewisville Education Foundation Inc
  • Who funds IRVING SCHOOLS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Paul Quinn College
  • Who funds HURST-EULESS-BEDFORD ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SAN ANGELO SCHOOLS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MIDLOTHIAN ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE HOWARD COLLEGE AT SAN ANGELO FOUNDATION
  • Who funds TARRANT COUNTY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds WI Cook Foundation Inc
  • Who funds POMONA COLLEGE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX21.9× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Methodist Hospitals of Dallas · Stribling Funding Corporation · GenYOUTH Incorporated · Celanese Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · McKesson Foundation Inc · Share Our Strength · Charities Aid Foundation America · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Texas Trust Gives funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Texas Trust Gives?

    Find your warmest path to Texas Trust Gives through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph