· Public charity
Mercury One Inc
Mercury one is a humanitarian aid and education organization focused on restoring the human spirit.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 10 grants below total $867,864 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,128,937 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $261,073 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k2 grants · $37k
- $50k–250k8 grants · $831k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| The Signatry - E Pluribus Unum Fund | $196,364 |
| HaYovel | $135,000 |
| Information Technology Disaster Resource Center | $100,000 |
| Save Our Allies | $100,000 |
| Operation Blessing | $100,000 |
| Operation BBQ Relief | $75,000 |
| Minuteman Disaster Response | $75,000 |
| Somebody Cares | $50,000 |
| The Blessings Project | $20,000 |
| Council for National Policy | $16,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 32% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $124k on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: Humanitarian Support
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
51 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 45 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $137k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TRTEAM RUBICON INC7× · 2017–2023 · $1.9M · revenue +18%
- OBOPERATION BBQ RELIEF8× · 2017–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +63%
- FOFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC4× · 2017–2023 · $539k · revenue +383%
Funded once
- SMSTEPHEN M RASCHE IOLTAone grant, 2017 · $1.3M
- HCHARVEST CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIPone grant, 2023 · $270k
- GCGATEWAY CHURCHone grant, 2022 · $180k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
i58 Global is a Christian ministry dedicated to recruiting, sending and organizing relief workers to provide aid and share hope to refugees in various European countries.
She Is Safe prevents, rescues and restores women and girls from abuse and exploitation in high risk communities across the globe, equipping them to build lives of freedom and faith for a strong future. We accomplish our work in partnership…
Redeem's mission is to protect widows and orphans from violent abuse and exploitation.
Unbound North Texas exists to support survivors and resource the community to fight human trafficking through Survivor Advocacy, a 24/7 Drop-In Center, and Prevention and Awareness.
Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.
The Forgotten International (TFI) is a non-profit organization dedicated to improving the welfare of impoverished and "forgotten" people in the poorest areas of the world.
To resource, train, and mobilize volunteers, churches,& other organizations to respond to disasters in the united states & world-wide
The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…
Freedom seekers international is a christian organization that exists to rescue the most severely persecuted for their religious faith in hostile and restrictive countries. through collaborative partnerships we deliver those who are…
To relieve human suffering, both physical and spiritual, by providing logistics services to local, regional, and international organizations helping people who face hardship, crisis, or disaster.
We provide aid to refugees, both at home and abroad. Simply humanitarian.
As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Minuteman Disaster Response Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Dpas Assist the Officer Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
84 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 84 of the 113 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Orphan Secure ↗
- Who funds TEAM RUBICON INC ↗
- Who funds SHAI FUND INC ↗
- Who funds OPERATION BBQ RELIEF ↗
- Who funds PLAYERS PHILANTHROPY FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Operation Blessing International Relief and Development Corporation ↗
- Who funds Servant Foundation ↗
- Who funds MIGHTY OAKS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
- Who funds SOMEBODY CARES AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds FREEDOM SHIELD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GLEANING FOR THE WORLD INC ↗
- Who funds TEXAS LIGHTHOUSE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DeliverFund ↗
- Who funds HOPE'S DOOR NEW BEGINNING CENTER ↗
- Who funds DALLAS FILM SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds SEED FOR CHANGE ↗
- Who funds INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DISASTER RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HAYOVEL INC ↗
- Who funds Kick Drugs Out of America Foundation ↗
- Who funds SM Wright Foundation ↗
- Who funds MINUTEMAN DISASTER RESPONSE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Provisions Project Inc ↗
- Who funds FEEDING CHILDREN INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds PASSAGES AMERICA ISRAEL INC ↗
- Who funds THE PREEMPTIVE LOVE COALITION ↗
- Who funds Life Santa ↗
- Who funds Save Our Allies ↗
- Who funds NADIA'S INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds BRAIN TREATMENT FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Dallas Foundation · Hillcrest Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Dallas Jewish Community Foundation · North Texas Food Bank · Servant Foundation · Morton H Meyerson Family Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · The Moody Foundation · Ruth C and Charles S Sharp Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Mercury One Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Mercury One Inc?
Find your warmest path to Mercury One Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.