Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Massmutual Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$12M
Granted FY2023
104
Grants FY2023
25
States reached
$1.5M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

93% of Massmutual Foundation Inc’s FY2024 grant dollars went to American Online Giving Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 3 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Massmutual Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 99 organizations, $12M. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

57
’17
52
’18
82
’19
70
’20
75
’21
87
’22
99
’23
3
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Philanthropy$37MEducation$17MCommunity Improvement$5.3MHousing & Shelter$5.3MHealth$4.9MHuman Services$3.8MScience & Tech$3.0MArts & Culture$3.0MOther$0
02FY2023 · 104 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k33 grants · $111k
  • $10k–50k23 grants · $366k
  • $50k–250k35 grants · $3.4M
  • $250k+13 grants · $8.2M
$25,000
Median grant
25
States reached
$34M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST FOUNDATION INC$1,500,000
BAYSTATE MEDICAL CENTER INC$1,050,000
BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION$894,028
NEW NORTH CITIZENS' COUNCIL$772,000
REVITALIZE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$600,000
THE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC$595,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS$570,000
GIRLS INC OF THE VALLEY$500,000
THE RED SOX FOUNDATION INC$425,000
NEIGHBORSHARE INC$375,000
WESTERN NEW ENGLAND UNIVERSITY$359,735
UNION CAPITAL BOSTON INC$270,000
UNITED WAY OF NORTH CENTRAL MASS INC$250,000
FRIENDS OF LIBERTAS ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL INC$200,000
BOSTON FOUNDATION INC$200,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $4.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Fresh Start Women's Foundation: $25k → 11%Schuylkill Ymca: $25k → 12%The Center For Great Expectations Inc: $25k → 5%GOOD NEIGHBOR VILLAGE INC: $25k → 9%YMCA OF THE NORTH SHORE INC: $25k → 10%YMCA Of Greater Springfield: $130k → 17%YMCA OF GREATER SPRINGFIELD: $75k → 17%YMCA OF GREATER SPRINGFIELD: $75k → 17%YMCA OF GREATER SPRINGFIELD: $75k → 17%AMERICAN RED CROSS OF MASSACHUSETTS: $75k → 8%YMCA OF GREATER SPRINGFIELD: $50k → 17%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $100k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $100k → 14%Desert Mission Inc: $150k → 11%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $75k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $75k → 14%American Red Cross: $75k → 14%RISE FOUNDATION INC: $130k → 17%RISE FOUNDATION INC: $115k → 17%SOCIAL INNOVATION FORUM: $80k → 16%RISE FOUNDATION INC: $115k → 17%RISE FOUNDATION INC: $113k → 17%Rise Foundation Inc: $62k → 17%UNION CAPITAL BOSTON INC: $270k → 16%UNION CAPITAL BOSTON INC: $90k → 16%UNION CAPITAL BOSTON INC: $83k → 16%UNION CAPITAL BOSTON INC: $80k → 16%SOCIAL INNOVATION FORUM INC: $100k → 16%Social Innovation Forum Inc: $95k → 16%Horizons For Homeless Children Inc: $50k → 16%SOCIAL INNOVATION FORUM: $27k → 16%MARTIN LUTHER KING JR FAMILY SERVICES INC: $200k → 17%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB FAMILY CENTER INC: $85k → 17%WOMEN'S FUND OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS: $190k → 17%Womens Fund Of Western Massachusetts: $155k → 17%Womens Fund Of Western Massachusetts: $150k → 17%Make-It Springfield Inc: $150k → 17%MAKE-IT-SPRINGFIELD INC: $117k → 17%WOMEN'S FUND OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS: $110k → 17%WOMENS FUND OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS: $100k → 17%MAKE-IT SPRINGFIELD INC: $80k → 17%Community United Way Of Pioneer Valley Inc: $55k → 17%UNITED WAY OF PIONEER VALLEY: $50k → 17%COMMUNITY UNITED WAY OF PIONEER VALLEY INC: $50k → 17%COMMUNITY UNITED WAY OF PIONEER VALLEY INC: $50k → 17%Community United Way Of Pioneer Valley Inc: $50k → 17%COMMUNITY UNITED WAY OF PIONEER VALLEY INC: $50k → 17%COMMUNITY UNITED WAY OF PIONEER VALLEY INC: $50k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
MS
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$44M · 100 repeat orgs$13M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.

100 repeat relationships — 51 still active in FY2023, 49 since wound down; 51 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

100
245

Total granted

$44M
$9.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+31%

Still filing today

88%
66%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $250k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $6.0M · revenue +755% · 34% of their budget
  • WF
    WAY FINDERS INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $4.0M · revenue +124%
  • NN
    NEW NORTH CITIZENS COUNCIL INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $2.0M · revenue +107%

Funded once

  • AO
    AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION I
    one grant, 2018 · $2.6M
  • UA
    UMASS AMHERST COMPUTER SCIENCE -UNIVERSITY OF MA
    one grant, 2020 · $1.5M
  • UA
    UMASS AMHERST COMPUTER SCIENCE
    one grant, 2017 · $1.5M

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Commonwealth Care Alliance Inc

Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.

Health
2
Lifestream Inc

Lifestream, inc. (the organization") provides community-based services that support individuals in attaining greater independence, promising opportunities, and lives that are meaningful and fulfilling on their own terms.

Health
3
Jewish Vocational Service Inc

To empower individuals from diverse communities to find employment and build careers, while partnering with employers to hire, develop, and retain productive workforces.

Employment
4
Marrakech Inc

Provides person-centered and inclusive services to children and adults with and without disabilities that includes securing employment, connecting to necessary supportive services, accessing housing and participating fully as contributing…

Employment
5
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

—
6
Abilitypath

Empower people with special needs to achieve their full potential through innovative, inclusive programs and community partnerships.

Employment
7
Springboard Collaborative

Springboard collaborative combines targeted student instruction with parent training in an incentivized system that closes the literacy gap, by transferring the summer from a barrier into a springboard for financially disadvantaged…

Human Services
8
Neighborhealth Corporation

Neighborhealth's mission is to promote and sustain healthy communities, families, and individuals by providing accessible, person-centered, and compassionate, high-quality health care services to all who live and work in our service area,…

Health
9
Homeward Bound Inc

Providing innovative and life-enriching services for children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities.

Human Services
10
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
11
Springwell Inc

Springwell helps individuals improve their quality of life and reduce their need for residential care by helping them access community resources. springwell works with individuals directly as well as with government agencies, health…

Human Services
12
United Children's Services of Bennington County Inc

Children's services

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Abilities First Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsFood Banks and PantriesHealth Access Advocacy and …Independent K-12 SchoolsCancer Support ServicesWomen & Girls Leadership De…Policy Research and AdvocacyElementary Literacy TutoringFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Volunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Dance Arts OrganizationsSenior Support ServicesJewish Community Organizati…School Parent OrganizationsPublic Library OperationsPregnancy Support ServicesAffordable Housing Construc…Community Food PantriesChristian Missionary Organi…Youth Sports ProgramsYouth Development ServicesEquine Therapy ProgramsMilitary Veterans SupportYouth Development CentersSchool District FoundationsDevelopmental Disabilities …Local History MuseumsDomestic Violence ServicesAffordable Housing Developm…United Way AffiliatesCommunity Arts CentersYmca Youth DevelopmentOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%1%<5yr14%9%5–10yr20%23%10–20yr19%29%20–35yr14%21%35–55yr14%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr14%5%5–10yr20%47%10–20yr19%29%20–35yr14%11%35–55yr14%7%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%5/338
the rest of the field
11%
4,714/42,020

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

314 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 314 of the 404 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

13
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
92
Early backer (in before they grew)
305/314
Grantees still filing
233/314
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC — $28,767,207 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INCCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS — $1,483,500 · Philanthropy+13 more — $3,605,375 · Philanthropy+13 moreUniversity Of Massachusetts Amherst — $3,000,000 · OtherUniversity Of Massachusetts Amher…AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION I — $2,577,574 · OtherAMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION…NEW NORTH CITIZENS COUNCIL INC — $2,024,671 · OtherNEW NORTH CITIZENS COUNCIL INCSPRINGFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOL — $2,013,222 · OtherSPRINGFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOLSpringfield Public Schools — $1,957,085 · OtherSpringfield Public SchoolsTHE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC — $1,882,500 · OtherTHE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHU…UMASS AMHERST COMPUTER SCIENCE -UNIVERSITY OF MA — $1,500,000 · OtherUMASS AMHERST COMPUTER SCIENCE -U…UMASS AMHERST COMPUTER SCIENCE — $1,500,000 · OtherUMASS AMHERST COMPUTER SCIENCEREVITALIZE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $1,130,000 · Other+86 more — $8,220,630 · Other+86 moreUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST FOUNDATION INC — $6,000,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF…WESTERN NEW ENGLAND UNIVERSITY — $1,202,789 · EducationWESTERN NEW E…Teach Western Mass Inc — $1,000,000 · EducationTeach Western…Teach for America Inc — $472,500 · EducationSPRINGFIELD MUSEUMS CORPORATION — $396,500 · Education+15 more — $1,201,500 · Education+15 moreWAY FINDERS INC — $4,031,650 · Housing & ShelterFRAYSER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $970,648 · Housing & ShelterINITIATIVE FOR A COMPETITIVE INNER CITY INC — $455,000 · Housing & Shelter+4 more — $129,000 · Housing & ShelterWOMEN'S FUND OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC — $705,000 · Human ServicesRISE MEMPHIS INC — $535,063 · Human ServicesUNION CAPITAL INC — $522,500 · Human ServicesYMCA of Greater Springfield Inc — $502,500 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $500,000 · Human ServicesUNITED WAY OF PIONEER VALLEY INC — $392,658 · Human ServicesMake-It Springfield Inc — $347,000 · Human ServicesSOCIAL INNOVATION FORUM INC — $327,000 · Human ServicesMARTIN LUTHER KING JR FAMILY SERVICES INC — $200,000 · Human ServicesDESERT MISSION INC — $165,000 · Human Services+22 more — $615,000 · Human ServicesBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION — $1,894,028 · HealthBAYSTATE MEDICAL CENTER INC — $1,050,000 · HealthTHE MERCY HOSPITAL INC — $800,000 · HealthMASS INSIGHT EDUCATION AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC — $255,000 · Health+17 more — $572,000 · HealthVIBRANT MEMPHIS INC — $1,182,130 · Community ImprovementVALLEY VENTURE MENTORING SERVICE INC — $575,000 · Community ImprovementSPRINGFIELD CULTURAL PARTNERSHIP INC ATTN KAREN FINN — $560,000 · Community ImprovementENTREPRENEURSHIP FOR ALL INC — $405,000 · Community ImprovementDEVELOPSPRINGFIELD CORPORATION — $252,000 · Community ImprovementWELLSPRING COOPERATIVE CORPORATION — $229,000 · Community ImprovementPIONEER VALLEY REGIONAL VENTURES CENTER INC — $130,250 · Community Improvement+3 more — $177,500 · Community Improvement
Philanthropy$33,856,082Other$25,805,682Education$10,273,289Housing & Shelter$5,586,298Human Services$4,811,721Health$4,571,028Community Improvement$3,510,880

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC — $28,767,207 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST FOUNDATION INC — $6,000,000 over 4y, 34% of budgetWAY FINDERS INC — $4,031,650 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetNEW NORTH CITIZENS COUNCIL INC — $2,024,671 over 5y, 8.4% of budgetBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION — $1,894,028 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC — $1,882,500 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS — $1,483,500 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetWESTERN NEW ENGLAND UNIVERSITY — $1,202,789 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetVIBRANT MEMPHIS INC — $1,182,130 over 4y, 17% of budgetREVITALIZE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $1,130,000 over 5y, 52% of budgetBAYSTATE MEDICAL CENTER INC — $1,050,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTeach Western Mass Inc — $1,000,000 over 6y, 52% of budgetFRAYSER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $970,648 over 5y, 46% of budgetBoston Foundation Inc — $865,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNAISMITH MEMORIAL BASKETBALL HALL OF FAME — $800,000 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetTHE MERCY HOSPITAL INC — $800,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE RED SOX FOUNDATION INC — $794,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetWOMEN'S FUND OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC — $705,000 over 5y, 21% of budgetVALLEY VENTURE MENTORING SERVICE INC — $575,000 over 2y, 54% of budgetSPRINGFIELD CULTURAL PARTNERSHIP INC ATTN KAREN FINN — $560,000 over 5y, 45% of budgetRISE MEMPHIS INC — $535,063 over 5y, 14% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC — $522,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetUNION CAPITAL INC — $522,500 over 4y, 23% of budgetRenaissance Charitable Foundation Inc — $510,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYMCA of Greater Springfield Inc — $502,500 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $500,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION — $500,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGIRLS INC OF THE VALLEY — $500,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetTeach for America Inc — $472,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetINITIATIVE FOR A COMPETITIVE INNER CITY INC — $455,000 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetSPRINGFIELD SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $414,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF ARIZONA — $405,333 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetENTREPRENEURSHIP FOR ALL INC — $405,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetSPRINGFIELD MUSEUMS CORPORATION — $396,500 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF PIONEER VALLEY INC — $392,658 over 8y, 4.2% of budgetNeighborShare Inc — $375,000 over 1y, 44% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER SPRINGFIELD INC — $362,500 over 7y, 8.0% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION — $347,279 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMake-It Springfield Inc — $347,000 over 3y, 74% of budgetSOCIAL INNOVATION FORUM INC — $327,000 over 5y, 5.5% of budgetHEALING RACISM INSTITUTE INC — $300,000 over 3y, 47% of budgetMASS INSIGHT EDUCATION AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC — $255,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetDEVELOPSPRINGFIELD CORPORATION — $252,000 over 3y, 20% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTH CENTRAL MASS INC — $250,000 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetSpringfield Library Foundation Inc — $250,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetSAINT FRANCIS HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $250,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetWELLSPRING COOPERATIVE CORPORATION — $229,000 over 6y, 17% of budgetROCA INC — $225,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Beveridge Family …Community Foundation …The Irene E and Georg…Berkshire Bank Founda…United Bank Foundatio…Peoplesbank Charitabl…Easthampton Savings B…Henrietta F Dexter Tu…Eversource Energy Fou…Chicopee Savings Bank…Peoples United Commun…Barr Foundation
The Beveridge Family FoundationMA81.2× affinity44 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Beveridge Family Foundation · Community Foundation of Western Massachusetts · The Irene E and George A Davis Foundation · Berkshire Bank Foundation Inc · United Bank Foundation Massachusetts Inc · Peoplesbank Charitable Foundation Inc · Easthampton Savings Bank Foundation Inc · Henrietta F Dexter Tuw-Dexter Ch · Eversource Energy Foundation Inc · Chicopee Savings Bank Charitable Foundation · Peoples United Community Foundation · Barr Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Massmutual Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 310%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Urban League of Greater Springfield Inc — 81% of income from government
  • Delaware Futures Inc — 78% of income from government
  • Roca Inc — 78% of income from government
  • New North Citizens Council Inc — 75% of income from government
  • Easter Seals Massachusetts Inc — 45% of income from government
  • Women Aware Inc — 43% of income from government
  • Community Workshops Inc — 39% of income from government
  • Neighborhood Villages Inc — 33% of income from government
  • Valley Venture Mentoring Service Inc — 32% of income from government
  • Springfield Cultural Partnership Inc Attn Karen Finn — 31% of income from government
  • Reader to Reader Inc — 30% of income from government
  • Girls Inc of the Valley — 30% of income from government
  • Easter Seals Serving Dc Md Va Inc — 29% of income from government
  • Nourishnj Inc — 27% of income from government
  • Fenway Community Health Center Inc — 27% of income from government
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
  • Sean Locke 24 Foundation — 21% of income from government
  • Horizons for Homeless Children — 21% of income from government
  • Healthy Foods for Healthy Kids Inc — 14% of income from government
  • Teach Western Mass Inc — 11% of income from government
  • United Way of Pioneer Valley Inc — 10% of income from government
  • Baystate Medical Center Inc — 9% of income from government
  • Springfield Symphony Orchestra Inc — 8% of income from government
  • Tech Foundry Inc — 6% of income from government
  • Ymca of the North Shore Inc — 6% of income from government
  • Feeding South Florida Inc — 5% of income from government
  • Springfield Museums Corporation — 5% of income from government
  • Way Finders Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Gnome Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Club Family Center Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Worcester State Foundation Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Make-It Springfield Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Asian Community Development Corporation — 2% of income from government
  • Spirit of Springfield — 2% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Clubs of Boston Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Entrepreneurship for All Inc — 2% of income from government
  • The Red Sox Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Club of Chicopee Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Special Olympics Massachusetts Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Western New England University — 1% of income from government
  • Mass Insight Education and Research Institute Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Breaktime United Inc — 1% of income from government
  • The Baseball Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Springfield College — 1% of income from government
  • Boston Youth Symphony Orchestras Inc — 1% of income from government
  • The Center for Effective Philanthropy Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Springfield Partners for Community Action Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Boston Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Baystate Health Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
31get no government money at all
60report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
4rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Massmutual Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Massmutual Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 404 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home