Skip to content

· Public charity

MAP International Inc

MAP International is a Christian organization providing life-changing medicines and health supplies to people in need.

$1.3B
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$38k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

International$88kEducation$58k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $59,653, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,265,212,554 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,265,152,901 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$37,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$364M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Project Hope$37,500
Christian Medical & Dental Associations$22,153
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY24–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Project Hope: $38k → 14%Convoy of Hope: $50k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $1.2B on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 9 regions, $1.2B to organizations and $39M to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Central America and the Caribbean$669M · 54% · 68 grants · 177 people

Stated purpose: Program Services Non-Cash · Health Promotion

Sub-Saharan Africa$394M · 32% · 57 grants · 193 people

Stated purpose: Program Services Non-Cash · Program Services Cash · Health Promotion

Middle East and North Africa$99M · 8% · 10 grants · 11 people

Stated purpose: Program Services Non-Cash · Health Promotion

South America$37M · 3% · 12 grants · 39 people

Stated purpose: Program Services Non-Cash · Program Services Cash · Health Promotion

Russia and Neighboring States$35M · 3% · 5 grants · 8 people

Stated purpose: Program Services Non-Cash · Health Promotion

East Asia and the Pacific$4.7M · 0% · 11 grants · 38 people

Stated purpose: Program Services Non-Cash · Health Promotion

South Asia$4.1M · 0% · 5 grants · 22 people

Stated purpose: Program Services Non-Cash · Health Promotion

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$1.5M · 0% · 3 grants · 5 people

Stated purpose: Program Services Non-Cash · Health Promotion

North America (Canada and Mexico)$1.1M · 0% · 9 grants · 10 people

Stated purpose: Program Services Non-Cash · Health Promotion

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Shared Christian Ministries

Our mission is to provide quality comprehensive free or low cost medical care for the uninsured, whatever their race or religion. The Clinic's services are available to any uninsured adult, 18 years old or older.

Health
2
Macon Volunteer Clinic Inc

Macon Volunteer Clinic (MVC)provides free primary medical and dental care, as well as medication assistance, to uninsured, working adult residents of Middle Georgia. All patients live at or below 200% of federal poverty level.

Health
3
Christian Community Health Center

To provide high quality primary health care and related services to the community regardless of the ability to pay, in a manner which demonstrates in work and deed the love of Jesus Christ.

Philanthropy
4
Christian Health Center of Howard County

The mission of the christian health clinic of howard county is to provide medical services, including dentistry and pharmacy, to the people of the county who cannot obtain medical care because of inability to pay.

Health
5
Jonesboro Church Health Center Inc

Our purpose is to address health disparities reduce barriers to care by offering essential medical services to those most in need. Our vision is that every person in our community has access to healthcare regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
6
Harvest Free Medical Clinic

Provide free medical care for those without resources to pay in the Charleston Tricounty area.

Health
7
Good Samaritan Health Center of Cobb Inc

The organization's mission is to spread the love of christ by providing quality healthcare to those in need.

Health
8
Good Samaritan Medical Clinic Inc

Providing medical services to the uninsured or under insured low income people

Human Services
9
Hope Clinic Inc

To spread the love of christ to the community by providing quality healthcare and spiritual guidance. the clinic's mission is to provide free medical care and spiritual guidance that minister to the whole person. the clinic will provide…

Human Services
10
Hope Clinic and Care Center Inc

To provide health care services in a holistic manner to patients who meet the clinic's eligibility requirements, currently income less than 300% of the federal poverty level.

Human Services
11
Good Samaritan Free Clinic Inc

We provide medical services to uninsured and underinsured in our community. This year our mission included assisting the Rescue Mission with healthcare for their residents as well as seeing patients at our clinic.

Health
12
Community Care Clinic Inc

To provide health care to low-income persons in the community who do not have health insurance through disease prevention, continuity of care, and active follow-up, we can prmote the health and well-being of the community.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shifa Healthcare & Community Services Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Ups Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

94 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
21
Early backer (in before they grew)
91/94
Grantees still filing
55/94
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHRISTIAN MEDICAL & DENTAL SOCIETY: $57,619 · InternationalCHRISTIAN MEDICAL & DENTAL SOCIETYCONVOY OF HOPE: $50,000 · InternationalCONVOY OF HOPEPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $37,500 · InternationalPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
International$145,119

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHRISTIAN MEDICAL & DENTAL SOCIETY: $57,619 over 2y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Americares Foundation IncCT74.4× affinity43 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Americares Foundation Inc · Direct Relief · National Association of Free and Charitable Clinics Inc · Heart to Heart International Inc · Georgia Charitable Care Network Inc · Sostento Inc · Medshare International Inc · Georgia Health Foundation Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Project Hope - the People-To-People Health Foundation Inc · Delta Dental Community Care Foundation · Georgia Health Initiative Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization MAP International Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from MAP International Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 3 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on MAP International’s filings →

    More from the funding graph