Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Lockton Cares Inc

Providing assistance to employees of Lockton Cares, Inc.

$976k
Granted FY2024still arriving
30
Grants FY2024still arriving
13
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.

Public Safety & Disaster$641kHealth$315kHuman Services$254kFood & Nutrition$239kEducation$229kHousing & Shelter$181kCommunity Improvement$107kPhilanthropy$89kOther$0
02FY2024 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 30 grants below total $757,998 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $976,111 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $218,113 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $380k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $335k
$25,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$319k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Camo to College$100,000
United Way$85,000
Your Ethiopian Professiona$50,000
World Central Kitchen$50,000
Operating Airdrop$50,000
Ronald McDonald House KC$37,998
United We$37,500
The Conn Institute for th$25,000
Holy Trinity Catholic Chur$25,000
Nationwide Childrens Hosp$25,000
The Motivational Edge$25,000
Leukemia and Lymphoma Soci$25,000
Into Freedom Inc$25,000
Heart of America Counsel B$25,000
Kansas City Dream Center$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $377k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%The ARC of San Francisco: $7k → 10%Heros on the Water: $10k → 5%Upbring Krause Children's: $20k → 8%Viola's House: $20k → 14%Epworth Childrens Home: $5k → 16%SafeHome: $20k → 5%Shepherd's Center: $20k → 16%Beauty 2 the Streetz: $7k → 14%Dallas Children's Advocacy: $35k → 14%Boysville: $10k → 16%The Conn Institute for th: $25k → 11%HouseProud: $25k → 13%Family Service: $10k → 16%House Proud Atlanta: $8k → 13%American Red Cross: $81k → 14%Reconciliation Services: $10k → 15%The De Moya Foundation: $10k → 15%American Red Cross: $28k → 14%American Red Cross: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
NY
MA
OH
PA
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of Lockton Cares Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Lockton Cares Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.1% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

27%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$615k · 8 repeat orgs$1.7M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
74

Total granted

$615k
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+18%

Still filing today

100%
92%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 33% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $443k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationFood & NutritionInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $176k · revenue +36%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    3× · 2021–2023 · $134k · revenue +27%
  • EA
    Excel After Service
    2× · 2023–2024 · $125k · revenue +103% · 63% of their budget

Funded once

  • IC
    INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS
    one grant, 2022 · $150k · revenue -13%
  • NT
    NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANKgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $66k · revenue +35%
  • The Houston Food Bankgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $63k · revenue +36%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
2
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
3
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
4
Covenant House

In 34 cities across five countries, covenant house builds bridges to hope for young people facing homelessness and survivors of human trafficking. we meet their immediate needs for food, clothing, protection, and medical and mental health…

Human Services
5
Covenant House Washington Dc

Covenant house washington, dc ("chw") provides shelter, crisis care, community services, and outreach services to youth in the washington dc area.

Human Services
6
Harvest Hope Food Bank

Harvest hope is on a mission to eliminate hunger and food insecurity in south carolina. we rescue nutritious food from stores throughout the state and distribute it to food pantries, shelters, and soup kitchens. we operate programs that…

Food & Nutrition
7
Colorado Coalition for the Homeless

The mission of the colorado coalition for the homeless is to work collaboratively toward the prevention of homelessness and the creation of lasting solutions for families, children, and individuals who are experiencing or at-risk of…

Human Services
8
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
9
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
10
Lifeworks Services Inc

Lifeworks' mission is to partner with people with disabilities to drive change by increasing opportunity and access in the community.

Human Services
11
Better Together Strengthening Familes Inc

Better together helps at-risk families by empowering parents and surrounding them with community, meaningful work opportunities, and practical support. our volunteer-driven, professionally supported model provides direct services so that…

Human Services
12
The Children's Home Society of Florida

Children's home society of florida mission statement:building bridges to success for children

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mile High United Way Inc and the most unlike its peers is De Moya Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyWomen & Girls Leadership De…Affordable Housing Construc…Cancer Support ServicesCommunity FoundationsLgbtq+ Community SupportMilitary Veterans SupportElementary Literacy TutoringEquine Therapy ProgramsVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Independent K-12 SchoolsCommunity FoundationsLocal Food System Organizat…Pregnancy Support ServicesPolicy Research and AdvocacyAnimal Rescue and ShelterYouth Development ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Domestic Violence ServicesSenior Support ServicesUnited Way AffiliatesChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Food Banks and Pantries
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr14%10%5–10yr19%25%10–20yr16%13%20–35yr13%26%35–55yr16%22%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%3%<5yr14%14%5–10yr19%26%10–20yr16%8%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr16%24%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.9%1/107
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,458

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

97 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 97 of the 107 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
95/97
Grantees still filing
63/97
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNITED WE — $75,000 · OtherUNITED WENORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK — $65,932 · OtherNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANKThe Houston Food Bank — $63,453 · OtherThe Houston Food BankOPERATION AIRDROP INC — $50,000 · OtherOPERATION AIRDROP INCYour Ethiopian Professional Network — $50,000 · OtherYour Ethiopian Professional NetworkVETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT — $36,480 · Other+40 more — $505,906 · Other+40 moreAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $134,319 · Human ServicesAmerican National …DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER — $35,000 · Human ServicesDALLAS CHILDREN'S …HOUSEPROUD ATLANTA INC — $32,500 · Human ServicesHOUSEPROUD ATLANTA…THE CONNECTICUT INSTITUTE FOR THE BLIND INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesTHE CONNECTICUT IN…SHEPHERD'S CENTER OF KANSAS CITY KANSAS — $20,000 · Human ServicesVIOLAS HOUSE — $20,000 · Human ServicesVOGEL ALCOVE — $20,000 · Human ServicesLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE SOUTH INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesSAFEHOME INC — $20,000 · Human Services+8 more — $69,740 · Human Services+8 moreWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $175,965 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KIT…INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS — $150,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL COM…INTO FREEDOM INC — $25,000 · InternationalINTO FREEDOM INCUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $15,000 · International+3 more — $21,997 · International+3 moreExcel After Service — $125,000 · EducationExcel After …FRIENDSHIP EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $25,000 · EducationFRIENDSHIP E…FRIENDS OF BREAKTHROUGH SCHOOLS — $25,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF B…THE MOTIVATIONAL EDGE INC — $25,000 · EducationTHE MOTIVATI…JULIA F THOMPSON INC — $25,000 · EducationJULIA F THOM…CATCH UP & READ INC — $10,000 · EducationIvymount Foundation Inc — $10,000 · EducationTHE I HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION OF MIAMI INC — $10,000 · EducationYEAR UP INC — $10,000 · Education+2 more — $12,995 · EducationRonald McDonald House Charities of Kansas City Inc — $37,998 · HealthRonald McDo…Dream On 3 — $27,656 · HealthDream On 3BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $25,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCE…CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $25,000 · HealthCYSTIC FIBR…The Children's Mercy Hospital — $25,000 · HealthThe Childre…MIAMI JEWISH HEALTH SYSTEMS FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 · HealthMIAMI JEWIS…The Battle Within Inc — $20,000 · HealthThe Battle …RESOURCE CENTER OF DALLAS INC — $20,000 · HealthRESOURCE CE…CHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION — $18,500 · HealthCHARLOTTE R…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $10,000 · Health+3 more — $17,710 · Health+3 moreUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE — $85,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WA…MILE HIGH UNITED WAY INC — $50,900 · PhilanthropyMILE HIGH…COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC — $30,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITI…MATT AND LISA ALLEN FAMILY FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 · PhilanthropyMATT AND …COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF TAMPA BAY INC — $15,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY…BRIDGE STEPS — $30,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW ORLEANS AND ACADIANA — $10,600 · Food & NutritionEVERY MEAL — $10,000 · Food & NutritionOPEN HAND ATLANTA INC — $10,000 · Food & NutritionREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK — $7,370 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY INC — $7,370 · Food & NutritionTHE FATHER MCKENNA CENTER INC — $6,017 · Food & NutritionCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC — $6,017 · Food & Nutrition
Other$846,771Human Services$396,559International$387,962Education$277,995Health$251,864Philanthropy$200,900Food & Nutrition$87,374

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $175,965 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS — $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $134,319 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetExcel After Service — $125,000 over 2y, 63% of budgetUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE — $85,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WE — $75,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK — $65,932 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank — $63,453 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILE HIGH UNITED WAY INC — $50,900 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOPERATION AIRDROP INC — $50,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities of Kansas City Inc — $37,998 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetVETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT — $36,480 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER — $35,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHOUSEPROUD ATLANTA INC — $32,500 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetBRIDGE STEPS — $30,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDream On 3 — $27,656 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetINTO FREEDOM INC — $25,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetFRIENDSHIP EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBack to Play — $25,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetADVANCING SIGHT NETWORK — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF BREAKTHROUGH SCHOOLS — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE MOTIVATIONAL EDGE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetJULIA F THOMPSON INC — $25,000 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREEN DECK INC — $25,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetThe Children's Mercy Hospital — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKansas City Dream Center Co — $25,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetTHE CONNECTICUT INSTITUTE FOR THE BLIND INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY OF HOPE — $25,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetMIAMI JEWISH HEALTH SYSTEMS FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSHEPHERD'S CENTER OF KANSAS CITY KANSAS — $20,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetVIOLAS HOUSE — $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCHILD PROTECTION CENTER INC — $20,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetMATT AND LISA ALLEN FAMILY FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetThe Battle Within Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetMorgan's Wonderland Management Company — $20,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetVOGEL ALCOVE — $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE SOUTH INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRESOURCE CENTER OF DALLAS INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAFEHOME INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH — $18,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION — $18,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $15,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARROW CHILD & FAMILY MINISTRIES (CENTRAL ORGANIZATION) — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater…Health Forward Founda…Greater Kansas City C…Oppenstein Brothers F…The Kansas City Royal…Hallmark Corporate Fo…Texas Women's Foundat…The Miami Foundation …United Way Miami IncAT&T FoundationBnsf Railway Foundati…Menorah Heritage Foun…
United Way of Greater Kansas City IncMO18.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · Health Forward Foundation · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Oppenstein Brothers Foundation · The Kansas City Royals Foundation · Hallmark Corporate Foundation · Texas Women's Foundation · The Miami Foundation Inc · United Way Miami Inc · AT&T Foundation · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Menorah Heritage Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lockton Cares Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 110%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 24%
  • Connecticut Alliance to End Sexual Violence Inc — 99% of income from government
  • The Legacy Foundation of Hartford — 77% of income from government
  • Goodwill Industries of South Florida Inc — 24% of income from government
  • Camillus House Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Community of Hope — 1% of income from government
  • Year Up Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
23report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lockton Cares Inc?

Find your warmest path to Lockton Cares Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 107 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines