Skip to content
Lockton Cares Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Lockton Cares Inc

Providing assistance to employees of Lockton Cares, Inc.

$976k
Granted FY2024still arriving
30
Grants FY2024still arriving
13
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Public Safety & Disaster$641kHealth$315kHuman Services$254kFood & Nutrition$239kEducation$229kHousing & Shelter$181kCommunity Improvement$107kPhilanthropy$89kOther$0
02FY2024 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 30 grants below total $757,998, the rows itemized in this filing. The $976,111 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $218,113 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $380k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $335k
$25,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$319k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Camo to College$100,000
United Way$85,000
World Central Kitchen$50,000
Your Ethiopian Professiona$50,000
Operating Airdrop$50,000
Ronald McDonald House KC$37,998
United We$37,500
Holy Trinity Catholic Chur$25,000
Nationwide Childrens Hosp$25,000
The Conn Institute for th$25,000
Leukemia and Lymphoma Soci$25,000
Back to Play$25,000
Heart of America Counsel B$25,000
Advancing Sight Network$25,000
Into Freedom Inc$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $377k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%The ARC of San Francisco: $7k → 10%Heros on the Water: $10k → 5%Upbring Krause Children's: $20k → 8%Viola's House: $20k → 14%Epworth Childrens Home: $5k → 16%SafeHome: $20k → 5%Shepherd's Center: $20k → 16%Beauty 2 the Streetz: $7k → 14%Dallas Children's Advocacy: $35k → 14%Boysville: $10k → 16%The Conn Institute for th: $25k → 11%HouseProud: $25k → 13%Family Service: $10k → 16%House Proud Atlanta: $8k → 13%American Red Cross: $81k → 14%Reconciliation Services: $10k → 15%The De Moya Foundation: $10k → 15%American Red Cross: $28k → 14%American Red Cross: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
NY
MA
OH
PA
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Lockton Cares Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Lockton Cares Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.1% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

27%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$615k · 8 repeat orgs$1.7M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
74

Total granted

$615k
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+23%

Still filing today

100%
92%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 33% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $443k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationFood & NutritionInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $176k · revenue +36%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    3× · 2021–2023 · $134k · revenue +27%
  • EA
    Excel After Service
    2× · 2023–2024 · $125k · revenue +103% · 63% of their budget

Funded once

  • IC
    INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS
    one grant, 2022 · $150k · revenue -13%
  • NT
    NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANKgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $66k · revenue +35%
  • The Houston Food Bankgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $63k · revenue +36%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
2
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
3
City Rescue Mission Inc

Our mission is to lead our community by serving people experiencing or at risk of homelessness with help, hope, and healing, in the spirit of excellence, under the call of christ.

Human Services
4
Covenant House

In 34 cities across five countries, covenant house builds bridges to hope for young people facing homelessness and survivors of human trafficking. we meet their immediate needs for food, clothing, protection, and medical and mental health…

Human Services
5
Covenant House Washington Dc

Covenant house washington, dc ("chw") provides shelter, crisis care, community services, and outreach services to youth in the washington dc area.

Human Services
6
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
7
Lifeworks Services Inc

Lifeworks' mission is to partner with people with disabilities to drive change by increasing opportunity and access in the community.

Human Services
8
Interval House

The mission of the organization is to ensure safety and stability for people who are battered, abused, homeless or at risk; to create public awareness about the epidemic of violence; and to mobilize the community to prevent violence and…

Human Services
9
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
10
The Children's Home Society of Florida

Children's home society of florida mission statement:building bridges to success for children

Human Services
11
Harvest Hope Food Bank

Harvest hope is on a mission to eliminate hunger and food insecurity in south carolina. we rescue nutritious food from stores throughout the state and distribute it to food pantries, shelters, and soup kitchens. we operate programs that…

Food & Nutrition
12
Better Together Strengthening Familes Inc

Better together helps at-risk families by empowering parents and surrounding them with community, meaningful work opportunities, and practical support. our volunteer-driven, professionally supported model provides direct services so that…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mile High United Way Inc; the most unlike its peers is De Moya Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

97 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 97 of the 107 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
95/97
Grantees still filing
63/97
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED WE: $75,000 · OtherUNITED WENORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $65,932 · OtherNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANKThe Houston Food Bank: $63,453 · OtherThe Houston Food BankOPERATION AIRDROP INC: $50,000 · OtherOPERATION AIRDROP INCYour Ethiopian Professional Network: $50,000 · OtherYour Ethiopian Professional NetworkVETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT: $36,480 · Other+40 more: $505,906 · Other+40 moreAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $134,319 · Human ServicesAmerican National …DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $35,000 · Human ServicesDALLAS CHILDREN'S …HOUSEPROUD ATLANTA INC: $32,500 · Human ServicesHOUSEPROUD ATLANTA…THE CONNECTICUT INSTITUTE FOR THE BLIND INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesTHE CONNECTICUT IN…VIOLAS HOUSE: $20,000 · Human ServicesSHEPHERD'S CENTER OF KANSAS CITY KANSAS: $20,000 · Human ServicesLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE SOUTH INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesVOGEL ALCOVE: $20,000 · Human ServicesSAFEHOME INC: $20,000 · Human Services+8 more: $69,740 · Human Services+8 moreWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $175,965 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KIT…INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS: $150,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL COM…INTO FREEDOM INC: $25,000 · InternationalINTO FREEDOM INCUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $15,000 · International+3 more: $21,997 · International+3 moreExcel After Service: $125,000 · EducationExcel After …FRIENDS OF BREAKTHROUGH SCHOOLS: $25,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF B…THE MOTIVATIONAL EDGE INC: $25,000 · EducationTHE MOTIVATI…JULIA F THOMPSON INC: $25,000 · EducationJULIA F THOM…FRIENDSHIP EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $25,000 · EducationFRIENDSHIP E…Ivymount Foundation Inc: $10,000 · EducationYEAR UP INC: $10,000 · EducationTHE I HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION OF MIAMI INC: $10,000 · EducationCATCH UP & READ INC: $10,000 · Education+2 more: $12,995 · EducationRonald McDonald House Charities of Kansas City Inc: $37,998 · HealthRonald McDo…Dream On 3: $27,656 · HealthDream On 3MIAMI JEWISH HEALTH SYSTEMS FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · HealthMIAMI JEWIS…CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $25,000 · HealthCYSTIC FIBR…The Children's Mercy Hospital: $25,000 · HealthThe Childre…BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $25,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCE…RESOURCE CENTER OF DALLAS INC: $20,000 · HealthRESOURCE CE…The Battle Within Inc: $20,000 · HealthThe Battle …CHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION: $18,500 · HealthCHARLOTTE R…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $10,000 · Health+3 more: $17,710 · Health+3 moreUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE: $85,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WA…MILE HIGH UNITED WAY INC: $50,900 · PhilanthropyMILE HIGH…COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $30,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITI…MATT AND LISA ALLEN FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyMATT AND …COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF TAMPA BAY INC: $15,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY…BRIDGE STEPS: $30,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW ORLEANS AND ACADIANA: $10,600 · Food & NutritionOPEN HAND ATLANTA INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionEVERY MEAL: $10,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY INC: $7,370 · Food & NutritionREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK: $7,370 · Food & NutritionTHE FATHER MCKENNA CENTER INC: $6,017 · Food & NutritionCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $6,017 · Food & Nutrition
Other$846,771Human Services$396,559International$387,962Education$277,995Health$251,864Philanthropy$200,900Food & Nutrition$87,374

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $175,965 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS: $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $134,319 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetExcel After Service: $125,000 over 2y, 63% of budgetUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE: $85,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WE: $75,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $65,932 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $63,453 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILE HIGH UNITED WAY INC: $50,900 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOPERATION AIRDROP INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities of Kansas City Inc: $37,998 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetVETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT: $36,480 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $35,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHOUSEPROUD ATLANTA INC: $32,500 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetBRIDGE STEPS: $30,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDream On 3: $27,656 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADVANCING SIGHT NETWORK: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGREEN DECK INC: $25,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetKansas City Dream Center Co: $25,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetMIAMI JEWISH HEALTH SYSTEMS FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF BREAKTHROUGH SCHOOLS: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE MOTIVATIONAL EDGE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJULIA F THOMPSON INC: $25,000 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetTHE CONNECTICUT INSTITUTE FOR THE BLIND INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY OF HOPE: $25,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetThe Children's Mercy Hospital: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDSHIP EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetINTO FREEDOM INC: $25,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetBack to Play: $25,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetRESOURCE CENTER OF DALLAS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVIOLAS HOUSE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSHEPHERD'S CENTER OF KANSAS CITY KANSAS: $20,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE SOUTH INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVOGEL ALCOVE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMorgan's Wonderland Management Company: $20,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSAFEHOME INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCHILD PROTECTION CENTER INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetMATT AND LISA ALLEN FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetThe Battle Within Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetCHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION: $18,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $18,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $15,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF TAMPA BAY INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARROW CHILD & FAMILY MINISTRIES (CENTRAL ORGANIZATION): $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater…Health Forward Founda…Greater Kansas City C…Oppenstein Brothers F…The Kansas City Royal…Hallmark Corporate Fo…Texas Women's Foundat…The Miami Foundation …United Way Miami IncAT&T FoundationBnsf Railway Foundati…Menorah Heritage Foun…
United Way of Greater Kansas City IncMO18.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · Health Forward Foundation · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Oppenstein Brothers Foundation · The Kansas City Royals Foundation · Hallmark Corporate Foundation · Texas Women's Foundation · The Miami Foundation Inc · United Way Miami Inc · AT&T Foundation · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Menorah Heritage Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lockton Cares Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lockton Cares Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 110%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 24%
  • Connecticut Alliance to End Sexual Violence Inc: 99% of income from government
  • The Legacy Foundation of Hartford: 77% of income from government
  • Goodwill Industries of South Florida Inc: 24% of income from government
  • Camillus House Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Community of Hope: 1% of income from government
  • Year Up Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
23report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lockton Cares Inc?

Find your warmest path to Lockton Cares Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 107 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lockton Cares’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home