· Private foundation
Lift a Life Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $5k
- $10k–50k20 grants · $416k
- $50k–250k22 grants · $1.8M
- $250k+8 grants · $8.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NORTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL | $2,180,410 |
| DAVID NOVAK LEADERSHIP INC | $2,100,000 |
| RITA JUNE FOUNDATION INC | $1,500,000 |
| METRO UNITED WAY | $812,500 |
| COMMUNITY COORDINATED CHILD CARE AKA 4-C | $470,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $425,000 |
| NATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION | $250,000 |
| HOME OF THE INNOCENTS | $250,000 |
| SONIA NABETA FOUNDATION | $215,000 |
| WEST PALM GOLF COMMUNITY TRUST | $200,000 |
| HORATIO ALGER ASSOCIATION | $150,000 |
| KENTUCKY CHAMBER FOUNDATION | $122,400 |
| RAYMOND JAMES CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT FUND | $100,000 |
| CAMP HENDON | $100,000 |
| MARYHURST | $100,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $5.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.
93 repeat relationships — 34 still active in FY2024, 59 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.4M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DTDARE TO CARE INC7× · 2017–2023 · $3.9M · revenue +38%
- FOFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION7× · 2017–2023 · $1.9M · revenue +162%
- CCCOMMUNITY COORDINATED CHILD CARE INC5× · 2017–2023 · $643k · revenue +71%
Funded once
FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $1.0M · revenue +585%- LMLOUISVILLE METRO POLICE FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2023 · $500k · revenue +19%
- MCMARINE CORE SCHOLARSHIP FUNDone grant, 2021 · $100k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
Goodwill's mission is to help people with disabilities or other disadvantages achieve and maintain employment to gain a better quality of life.
Louisville collegiate school inspires academic excellence, extraordinary character and global citizenship.
Identify, mobilize, and fund programs to address louisville's greatest challenges regarding business growth and increased economic prosperity for all citizens in the greater louisville region.
Addressing the unmet health needs of kentuckians by developing and influencing policy, improving access to care, reducing health risks and disparities, and promoting health equity. the foundation makes grants, conducts campaigns, supports…
Healthfirst provides outpatient primary healthcare, behavioral health and dental services to the underserved and uninsured residents of fayette county and surrounding counties in kentucky.
Reducing the barriers and burdens that families in poverty experience by increasing access to essential needs.
The catholic education foundation is dedicated to the growth and vitality of catholic education in the archdiocese of louisville. the foundation advances its mission primarily through tuition assistance grants to families who cannot afford…
Endeavor Louisville is leading the high-impact entrepreneurship movement in Kentucky, Indiana and Ohio, catalyzing long-term economic growth by selecting, mentoring, and supporting the best high-impact entrepreneurs in our region.…
To support grassroots organizing, leadership development & public education around important public policy. ky coalition seeks to promote active citizen participation in the democratic process.
Everything we do is market-focused and proactively promotes and protects the interests of the southeast dairy farm families.
Common impact's mission is to strengthen the capacity of social change organizations, enabling them to better run and scale their programs. through its partnership with companies, common impact taps into the business skills and expertise…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc and the most unlike its peers is Masters Tournament Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.6% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
154 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 154 of the 223 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds METRO UNITED WAY INC ↗
- Who funds DARE TO CARE INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR IMPACT ON LITERACY AND LEARNING INC ↗
- Who funds DAVID NOVAK LEADERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RITA JUNE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOUISVILLE INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds KENTUCKY DIABETES CAMP FOR CHILDREN INC D/B/A CAMP HENDON ↗
- Who funds BOB RUSSELL MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds FUND FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY COORDINATED CHILD CARE INC ↗
- Who funds Iron Bell Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds LOUISVILLE METRO POLICE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WEST PALM GOLF COMMUNITY TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds HORATIO ALGER ASSN OF DISTINGUISHED AMERICANS INC ↗
- Who funds MARYHURST INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds STAGEONE FAMILY THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN ACADEMY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE HOME OF THE INNOCENTS INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL CENTER FOR FAMILIES LEARNING INC ↗
- Who funds THE SONIA NABETA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GILDA'S CLUB KENTUCKIANA INC ↗
- Who funds LIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC ↗
- Who funds FEEDING KENTUCKY INC ↗
- Who funds A CURE FOR ROBERT INC ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF KENTUCKIANA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Gheens Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Corporate Depository Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Depository Inc · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · Kosair Charities Committee Inc · Cralle Foundation Inc · James Graham Brown Foundation Inc · LG&E and Ku Foundation Inc · Snowy Owl Foundation Inc · Republic Bank Foundation Inc · Metro United Way Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Lift a Life Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Palm Beach Atlantic University Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Lift a Life Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Lift a Life Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.