How much did CRALLE FOUNDATION INC grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 50% of CRALLE FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

louisville youthorchestrateachhillscholarathletescancer

2019

handdiaper bankteachdreamsettlementsistershabitat humanity

2020

hillwingschildrensjohnshively ministriesplacewomen

2021

sistersgatewaybluegrasschildrenschristianplace

2022

gatewaychildrenshopechristianlexingtonplaceparks

2023

farmcave hillhill heritageriverwingsgatewayhope

2024

justicegatewaylibraryrescuechildrenchildren'shope

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 99 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k73 grants · $405k
$10k–50k26 grants · $261k

$5,000

Median grant

States reached

$14M

Total assets

Largest grants

ALZHEIMERS DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC GREATER KENTUCKY$10,500
OPERATION CARE$10,202
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF METRO LOUISVILLE$10,000
BUCKHORN CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES$10,000
MORTON CENTER$10,000
HARBOR HOUSE OF LOUISVILLE INC$10,000
ORCHID HOUSE INC$10,000
LEXINGTON RESCUE MISSION INC$10,000
NAZARETH HOME$10,000
DOWN SYNDROME OF LOUISVILLE INC$10,000
REFUGE FOR WOMEN INC$10,000
DARE TO CARE INC$10,000
ORPHAN CARE ALLIANCE INC$10,000
DAY SPRING$10,000
FAMILY & CHILDREN'S PLACE$10,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $703k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 12%. 90% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$4.0M · 151 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +59% since the first grant, against +39% for the ones you funded once.

151 repeat relationships — 69 still active in FY2024, 82 since wound down; 30 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

151

153

Total granted

$4.0M

$951k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%

+39%

Still filing today

67%

44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $194k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesEducationHealthHousing & ShelterArts & CultureFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

PW
PAWS WITH PURPOSE INC
8× · 2017–2024 · $95k · revenue +65%
FA
FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S PLACE
6× · 2017–2024 · $88k · revenue +161%
TH
THE HEALING PLACE
7× · 2017–2024 · $83k · revenue +14%

Funded once

OP
OPERATION PARENTgraduated
one grant, 2018 · $28k · revenue +356%
R
RAMP
one grant, 2019 · $18k
WC
WAYSIDE CHRISTIAN MISSIONgraduated
one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +33%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Family Nurturing Center of Kentucky

The mission of Family Nurturing Center is to end the cycle of child abuse by promoting individual well-being and healthy family relationships. We envision a world with safe children, thriving families and nurturing communities and offer a…

—

Child Watch Counseling and Advocacy

To provide families in western kentucky with education, advocacy and treatment that prevents child abuse, encourages family stability, promotes healthy relationships, enhances well-being and cultivates safe, nurturing families.

Crime & Legal

Kvc Behavioral Healthcare Kentucky Inc

To enrich and enhance the lives of children and their families by providing medical and behavioral healthcare, social services and education.

Health

Jobs for Kentucky's Graduates Inc

To assist at risk students to graduate from high school and successfully transition to work or further education

Education

Westcare Kentucky Inc

To provide substance abuse prevention & treatment.

Health

Heart of Kentucky United Way Inc

Heart of kentucky united way advances the common good by creating opportunities for a better life for all.

—

Hospice of Hope Inc

Hospice of hope is an organization devoted to caring for the physical, psychosocial, emotional and spiritual needs of terminally ill individuals and their families. the organization also provides for an assisted living facility in…

Human Services

Ky Access to Justice Commission Inc

Provided access to the courts and high-quality legal representation for people with low and moderate incomes living in kentucky.

Crime & Legal

Lifeworks At Wku Inc

Lifeworks offers a two year program focusing on independence, productivity, and community engagement for adults on the autism spectrum. the goal of the program is to assist individuals on the autism spectrum to transition from schooling to…

Health

Easter Seals West Kentucky Inc

To create solutions that change lives of children and adults with disabilities or other special needs and their families.

Human Services

United Way of Kentucky Inc

As a focused team of leaders, united way of kentucky will align resources and work to advance education, income and health.

Philanthropy

Kentucky Public Radio Inc

Louisville public media (lpm) is an independent, community-supported nonprofit serving our community on the web, on the radio, through podcasts and community events. lpm includes three public radio stations and an investigative unit.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cabbage Patch Settlement House Inc and the most unlike its peers is Speed Art Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/197

the rest of the field

12%

819/7,087

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

189 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

186/189

Grantees still filing

151/189

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$2,925,088Human Services$889,052Health$482,528Education$331,500Housing & Shelter$302,500Food & Nutrition$137,000Youth Development$122,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels IncKY192.3× affinity113 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · The Gheens Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville · The Community Foundation Of · The Community Foundation of Louisville · Snowy Owl Foundation Inc · Kosair Charities Committee Inc · LG&E and Ku Foundation Inc · V V Cooke Foundation Corporation · Wood & Marie Hannah Foundation · The Whas Crusade for Children Inc · James Graham Brown Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation CRALLE FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: INFINITE HOPE.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 10.6× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 852877926 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on INFINITE HOPE, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 35% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Cralle Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Cralle Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

CRALLE FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

189 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Cralle Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph

CRALLE FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

189 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Cralle Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph