· Private foundation
James Graham Brown Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k8 grants · $33k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $117k
- $50k–250k12 grants · $1.3M
- $250k+23 grants · $14M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RITA JUNE FOUNDATION | $1,500,000 |
| KENTUCKY DERBY MUSEUM | $1,025,000 |
| KENTUCKY COUNCIL ON POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION | $1,000,000 |
| FEDERATION OF APPALACHIAN HOUSING ENTERPRISES | $880,625 |
| LOUISVILLE FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION | $755,000 |
| PARKS ALLIANCE OF LOUISVILLE | $750,000 |
| AMPED | $750,000 |
| CENTRE COLLEGE | $749,419 |
| THE HOUSING PARTNERSHIP INC | $575,000 |
| KENTUCKY COMMUNITY AND TECHNOLOGICAL COLLEGE SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC | $550,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION | $536,286 |
| J B SPEED ART MUSEUM | $500,000 |
| KENTUCKY EDUCATIONAL TELEVISION FOUNDATION | $500,000 |
| AMERICANA COMMUNITY CENTER | $500,000 |
| GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF KENTUCKY INC | $500,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $6.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.
66 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2024, 35 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.5M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UOUNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC4× · 2021–2024 · $5.1M · revenue +13%
- CCCENTRE COLLEGE5× · 2020–2024 · $5.0M · revenue +53%
- TLTHE LOUISVILLE URBAN LEAGUE INC3× · 2020–2022 · $2.3M · revenue +97% · 27% of their budget
Funded once
- UOUNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLEone grant, 2020 · $2.0M
- WPWATERFRONT PARK FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2021 · $2.0M
BEREA COLLEGEone grant, 2022 · $1.0M · revenue -13%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To improve the quality of life for all kentuckians through research, education and advocacy on important policy issues facing the commonwealth.
Endeavor Louisville is leading the high-impact entrepreneurship movement in Kentucky, Indiana and Ohio, catalyzing long-term economic growth by selecting, mentoring, and supporting the best high-impact entrepreneurs in our region.…
To represent our members, creating the environment and opportunity for economic prosperity and quality living in central kentucky.
To support grassroots organizing, leadership development & public education around important public policy. ky coalition seeks to promote active citizen participation in the democratic process.
Broadens the perspectives of current and emerging leaders through experiential education that inspires them to advance kentucky.
Louisville collegiate school inspires academic excellence, extraordinary character and global citizenship.
To increase access to the courts and high-quality legal representation for people with low and moderate incomes living in kentucky through innovative partnerships with the judiciary, the civil legal aid programs, private bar, law schools,…
To eliminate barriers, achieve economic security and empower families by partnering with other service providers.
The Kentucky Chamber Foundation's purpose is to unlock the power of business, accelerate solutions, and build opportunity in Kentucky.
To provide effective advocacy for the financial services industry both in kentucky and on a national level; to serve as a reliable and responsive source of information and education about areas of interest to the industry; and to provide a…
Everything we do is market-focused and proactively promotes and protects the interests of the southeast dairy farm families.
Our mission is to transform northern kentucky by uniting and mobilizing community leaders around initiatives that produce tangible, measureable results.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Louisville Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Kentucky Chess Ambassadors. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
136 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 136 of the 158 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOUISVILLE INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY VENTURES CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR APPALACHIAN KENTUCKY INC ↗
- Who funds THE LOUISVILLE URBAN LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds KENTUCKY COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ONEWEST CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds WELLSPRING INC ↗
- Who funds THE HOUSING PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds RITA JUNE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds EVOLVE502 INC ↗
- Who funds PARKS ALLIANCE OF LOUISVILLE INC ↗
- Who funds LOUISVILLE HOUSING OPPORTUNITY AND MICRO ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds Simmons College of Kentucky Inc ↗
- Who funds METRO UNITED WAY INC ↗
- Who funds ADVENTUROUS MINDS PRODUCE EXTRAORDINARY DREAMS INC ↗
- Who funds KENTUCKY DERBY MUSEUM CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds FEDERATION OF APPALACHIAN HOUSING ENTERPRISES INC ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR NONPROFIT EXCELLENCE ↗
- Who funds TEACH KENTUCKY INC ↗
- Who funds SPEED ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds BEREA COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF KENTUCKY INC ↗
- Who funds THE GREATER LOUISVILLE WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD INC ↗
- Who funds NEW DIRECTIONS HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds LOUISVILLE FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATIO ↗
- Who funds the Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Louisville Inc ↗
- Who funds ISAAC W BERNHEIM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LOUISVILLE COMMUNITY DESIGN CENTER INC DBA CENTER FOR NEIGHBORHOODS ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL CENTER FOR FAMILIES LEARNING INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SCHOLAR HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds Alabama Forest Land Trust Inc ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF KENTUCKIANA INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY & CHILDREN'S PLACE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Gheens Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Corporate Depository Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · LG&E and Ku Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Depository Inc · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · Snowy Owl Foundation Inc · Sociable Weaver Foundation Inc · C E and S Foundation Inc · Metro United Way Inc · Cralle Foundation Inc · Republic Bank Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization James Graham Brown Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.