· Private foundation
Leland Fikes Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k12 grants · $310k
- $50k–250k65 grants · $4.5M
- $250k+7 grants · $3.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER | $1,000,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS | $600,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA | $600,000 |
| THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER | $400,000 |
| DALLAS 24 HOUR CLUB INC | $250,000 |
| PARKLAND FOUNDATION | $250,000 |
| TEXAS FREEDOM NETWORK EDUCATION FUND | $250,000 |
| TRUTH PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER | $150,000 |
| TWELFTH STEP MINISTRY INC | $150,000 |
| AMALGAMATED CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC | $150,000 |
| CHILD POVERTY ACTION LAB | $150,000 |
| THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER | $125,000 |
| NORTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC | $100,000 |
| WILLIAM J BRENNAN JR CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC | $100,000 |
| ABIDE WOMEN'S HEALTH SERVICES INC | $100,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $2.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
72 repeat relationships — 58 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $955k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC5× · 2020–2024 · $3.2M · revenue +4%
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC5× · 2020–2024 · $2.9M · revenue +40%- PFPARKLAND FOUNDATION5× · 2020–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +30%
Funded once
- USUT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER (DBA UT SOUTHWESTERN)one grant, 2021 · $1.1M
- JFJEWISH FAMILY SERVICEone grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +17%
- TSTRINITY SCHOOL OF MIDLAND TEXASgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +83%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Progress Texas Institute provides research and strategic communications on issues with the ultimate goal of increasing civic engagement.
Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Family Planning and Preventative Health provides comprehensive and complementary health care services in settings that preserve and protect the essential privacy and rights of the individual, advocates…
Progress Texas is a non-profit media organization advocating for progressive ideals and policies in our state.
The ACLU of Texas works with communities, at the State Capitol, and in the courts to protect and advance civil rights and civil liberties for every Texan, no exceptions.
RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…
See Schedule OTDS fights for the end of mass incarceration and excessive punishment in Texas through direct representation, policy reform, and public education. TDS stands up for the dignity and humanity of people harmed by mass…
EQTX Equality Texas dba Equality Texas works to secure full equality for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer Texans through political action, education, community organizing, and collaboration.
Downtown Dallas, Inc. (DDI), is the champion of a clean and safe Downtown and of the economic development and vibrancy of this community of diverse, unique neighborhoods. DDI: Mobilizes and amplifies the services of public agencies.…
The foundation's mission is to strengthen and support faith communities by partnering wise investments with purposeful giving.
As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.
The purpose of Planned Parenthood South Texas ("the Organization") is to provide family planning and sexual healthcare services to both adults and teenagers, with particular emphasis on serving low-income and medically underserved…
TexProtects advances public policy and local implementation to strenghten families to prevent child abuse and neglect.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Dallas Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Avow Foundation for Abortion Access. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
102 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 102 of the 123 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds PARKLAND FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TEXAS FREEDOM NETWORK EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds DALLAS SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds JUBILEE PARK & COMMUNITY CENTER CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds CHILD POVERTY ACTION LAB ↗
- Who funds TWELFTH STEP MINISTRY INC ↗
- Who funds WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds ACLU Foundation of Texas Inc ↗
- Who funds MEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA ↗
- Who funds TEXAS JUSTICE AND EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC ↗
- Who funds Center on Budget and Policy Priorities ↗
- Who funds The Family Place ↗
- Who funds Center for Public Policy Priorities ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds DALLAS 24 HOUR CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWESTERN DIABETIC FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HOUSING FORWARD ↗
- Who funds ABIDE WOMENS HEALTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER DALLAS INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC ↗
- Who funds THE SPRINGBOARD CENTER ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF DALLAS INC DBA JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE ↗
- Who funds OFICINA LEGAL DEL PUEBLO UNIDO INC ↗
- Who funds WINDWARD FUND ↗
- Who funds FORT GRIFFIN FANDANGLE ASSOC INC ↗
- Who funds LAKEHILL PREPARATORY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
- Who funds FAMILY GATEWAY INC ↗
- Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Dallas Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Texas Women's Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · The Addy Foundation · Hillcrest Foundation · The Moody Foundation · W P & Bulah Luse Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Meadows Foundation Inc · Hoblitzelle Foundation · Dallas Jewish Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Leland Fikes Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
- Upstream Usa Inc — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Leland Fikes Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Leland Fikes Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.