· Public charity
La Family Housing Corporation
L.a.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 3 grants below total $1,891,129 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,758,916 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,867,787 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LAFHBUILDS INC | $895,034 |
| HARMONY VILLA INC | $626,847 |
| LAFH PERMANENT HOUSING CORP | $369,248 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $6.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +180% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.9M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HTHOPE THE MISSION7× · 2017–2023 · $3.3M · revenue ×16
- BTBRIDGE TO HOME SCV7× · 2017–2023 · $1.3M · revenue +435% · 29% of their budget
NORTHEAST VALLEY HEALTH CORPORATION6× · 2017–2023 · $1.1M · revenue +81%
Funded once
- CFCOALITION FOR RESPONSIBLE COMMUNITY DEVELone grant, 2021 · $100k
- SFSan Fernando Valley Community Mental Health Center Incgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $28k · revenue +28%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We work to end homelessness through housing solutions, supportive services, and connection to community. we advocate for equitable and just systems that ensure all individuals and families will have a safe place they can call home.
L.a. family housing corporation and its affiliated organizations help homeless and low-income families and individuals of the greater los angeles area transition out of poverty and create lasting stability by providing a comprehensive…
Our mission is to create housing and service options that model, with respect and dignity, sustainable, environmentally sensitive, affordable communities for people of limited resources.
The mission of the organization is to ensure safety and stability for people who are battered, abused, homeless or at risk; to create public awareness about the epidemic of violence; and to mobilize the community to prevent violence and…
The center provides a place of community to end isolation, build relationships, and introduce housing, health and wellness services to adult individuals experiencing homelessness in hollywood. it contracts with public and non-profit grant…
The City Center Transitional Living provides transitional living for homeless individuals and families in Ventura, CA, equipping them to rebuild their lives for self sufficiency.
Welfare l.a.f.h. temporary housing corp i provides year-round emergency shelter and transitional housing to the homeless.
Provide housing and services to the most vulnerable population, especially those transitioning from (or at risk of) homelessness or institutionalization, through a variety of innovative supportive housing models.
Mentorship and housing assistant for women returning from incarceration
Provide residential recovery housing to those who are in recovery from drug and alcohol use and, in many cases, homeless
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Home Again Los Angeles and the most unlike its peers is Pals N Pets Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HOPE THE MISSION ↗
- Who funds CHILDRENS HOMES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds BRIDGE TO HOME SCV ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST VALLEY HEALTH CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds LAFHBUILDS INC ↗
- Who funds HARMONY VILLA INC ↗
- Who funds TARZANA TREATMENT CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds NEW ECONOMICS FOR WOMEN ↗
- Who funds LAFH PERMANENT HOUSING CORP ↗
- Who funds ASCENCIA ↗
- Who funds ANTELOPE VALLEY PARTNERS FOR HEALTH ↗
- Who funds CHRYSALIS CENTER ↗
- Who funds HOME AGAIN LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds NEW DIRECTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds San Fernando Valley Community Mental Health Center Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Shelter Partnership Inc · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · United Way Inc · The Ahmanson Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Providence Health System - So California · The Rose Hills Foundation · Baby2baby · The Annenberg Foundation · Sempra Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization La Family Housing Corporation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.