· Private foundation
Kissick Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $78k
- $50k–250k11 grants · $1.4M
- $250k+13 grants · $5.8M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| 10000 BRAINS NEURO AL INC | $1,000,000 |
| OCEAN VISIONS | $750,000 |
| THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CA SAN FRANCISCO | $650,000 |
| THE WINDWARD FUND | $600,000 |
| DIGITAL HARBOR FOUNDATION | $500,000 |
| SPARK CLIMATE SOLUTIONS INC | $500,000 |
| PURPOSE CAMPAIGNS LLC | $300,000 |
| STANFORD UNIVERSITY | $300,000 |
| 1907 FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL INC | $250,000 |
| THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA | $250,000 |
| GREAT BARRIER REEF FOUNDATION | $250,000 |
| THE JOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY | $250,000 |
| MAYO CLINIC | $250,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE | $235,216 |
| STANFORD - ATHLETIC DEPARTMENT | $200,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $355k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 9% of Kissick Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
78 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 64 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.0M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OVOCEAN VISIONS INC3× · 2022–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +173%
YEAR UP INC6× · 2017–2023 · $1.2M · revenue +1%- TMTHE MILKEN INSTITUTE3× · 2022–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +42%
Funded once
- DODIRECTOR OF SPORTS PERFORMANCEone grant, 2017 · $400k
- UOUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $300k · revenue +10%
- SUSTANFORD UNIVERSITY - DEPARTMENT OF ATHLETICSone grant, 2020 · $200k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…
The aquarium of the pacific's mission is to instill a sense of wonder, respect, and stewardship for the pacific ocean, its inhabitants, and ecosystems.
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.
Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
The Institute is a scientific research center dedicated to conducting basic and applied research to advance the understanding of human disease and the improvement of human health. The Institute fosters an innovative research environment…
The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.
The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.
The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Center for Family Philanthropy Inc and the most unlike its peers is The National World War Ii Museum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 11% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
96 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 96 of the 165 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WINDWARD FUND ↗
- Who funds OCEAN VISIONS INC ↗
- Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds YEAR UP INC ↗
- Who funds THE MILKEN INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds 10000 BRAINS NEURO AI INC ↗
- Who funds THE BETTER ANGELS SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds CAREMESSAGE ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE MATCH ↗
- Who funds PEER HEALTH EXCHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds Collegespring Inc ↗
- Who funds DIGITAL HARBOR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Spark Climate Solutions ↗
- Who funds 1907 FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds EDUCATORS FOR EXCELLENCE INC ↗
- Who funds LA PROMISE FUND ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds EARTHENABLE INC ↗
- Who funds EMPOWERS AFRICA INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Barrel Bag ↗
- Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
- Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
- Who funds PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Joseph Drown Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Weingart Foundation · Elbridge Stuart Foundation Dba Stuart Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · The Resslergertz Foundation · The Rosalinde and Arthur Gilbert Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Kissick Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- New England Aquarium Corporation — 12% of income from government
- Shatterproof a Nonprofit Corporation — 2% of income from government
- Digital Harbor Foundation — 2% of income from government
- Uaspire Inc — 1% of income from government
- Year Up Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Kissick Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Kissick Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.