Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kissick Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
33
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$7.6MEnvironment$5.7MHealth$4.3MRecreation & Sports$2.0MSocial Science$1.3MEmployment$1.2MArts & Culture$1.2MInternational$685kOther$0
02FY2024 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $78k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $1.4M
  • $250k+13 grants · $5.8M
$160,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$105M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
10000 BRAINS NEURO AL INC$1,000,000
OCEAN VISIONS$750,000
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CA SAN FRANCISCO$650,000
THE WINDWARD FUND$600,000
SPARK CLIMATE SOLUTIONS INC$500,000
DIGITAL HARBOR FOUNDATION$500,000
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$300,000
PURPOSE CAMPAIGNS LLC$300,000
THE JOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$250,000
MAYO CLINIC$250,000
THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$250,000
GREAT BARRIER REEF FOUNDATION$250,000
1907 FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL INC$250,000
UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE$235,216
EARTH ENABLE INC$200,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $355k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%COMPANIONS FOR HEROES: $500 → 14%TIA'S HOPE: $25k → 14%TIA'S HOPE: $25k → 14%TIA'S HOPE: $25k → 14%TIA'S HOPE: $25k → 14%TIA'S HOPE: $25k → 14%WORKING NATION: $50k → 14%WORKING NATION: $50k → 14%PALISADES PRIDE: $1k → 14%PALISADES PRIDE: $1k → 14%PALISADES PRIDE: $1k → 14%PALISADES PRIDE: $1k → 14%FULFILLMENT FUND: $50k → 14%FULFILLMENT FUND: $25k → 14%FULFILLMENT FUND: $25k → 14%FULFILLMENT FUND: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
KS
DC
LA
MS
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of Kissick Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Kissick Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.1% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$16M · 78 repeat orgs$6.8M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

78 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 64 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

78
66

Total granted

$16M
$2.9M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+10%

Still filing today

62%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthArts & CultureAnimalsEnvironmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OV
    OCEAN VISIONS INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +173%
  • YEAR UP INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $1.2M · revenue +1%
  • TM
    THE MILKEN INSTITUTE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • DO
    DIRECTOR OF SPORTS PERFORMANCE
    one grant, 2017 · $400k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $300k · revenue +10%
  • SU
    STANFORD UNIVERSITY - DEPARTMENT OF ATHLETICS
    one grant, 2020 · $200k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
3
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
4
Aquarium of the Pacific Corporation

The aquarium of the pacific's mission is to instill a sense of wonder, respect, and stewardship for the pacific ocean, its inhabitants, and ecosystems.

Animals
5
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
6
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
7
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
8
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
9
The California Medical Innovations Institute Inc

The Institute is a scientific research center dedicated to conducting basic and applied research to advance the understanding of human disease and the improvement of human health. The Institute fosters an innovative research environment…

Education
10
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
11
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
12
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Center for Family Philanthropy Inc; the most unlike its peers is The National World War Ii Museum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

96 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 96 of the 165 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
94/96
Grantees still filing
60/96
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE MILKEN INSTITUTE: $1,150,500 · OtherTHE MILKEN INSTITUTETHE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CA SAN FRANCISCO: $650,000 · OtherTHE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CA SAN FRANCISCOSTANFORD - ATHLETIC DEPARTMENT: $600,000 · OtherSTANFORD UNIVERSITY ATHLETIC DEPARTMENT: $510,000 · OtherGREAT BARRIER REEF FOUNDATION: $450,000 · OtherLA'S PROMISE FUND: $450,000 · OtherPEER HEALTH EXCHANGE INC: $575,000 · Other+103 more: $7,624,941 · Other+103 moreTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $1,373,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF TH…YEAR UP INC: $1,225,000 · EducationYEAR UP INCCAREMESSAGE: $750,000 · EducationCAREMESSAGECOLLEGE MATCH: $610,000 · EducationCOLLEGE MATCHCollegespring Inc: $575,000 · EducationCollegespring IncDIGITAL HARBOR FOUNDATION: $500,000 · EducationDIGITAL HARBOR FOUNDATIONEDUCATORS FOR EXCELLENCE INC: $350,000 · EducationEDUCATORS FOR EXCELLENCE IN…LA PROMISE FUND: $350,000 · EducationLA PROMISE FUNDUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $300,000 · EducationTeach for America Inc: $225,000 · Education+7 more: $277,500 · EducationWINDWARD FUND: $2,100,000 · EnvironmentWINDWARD FUN…Spark Climate Solutions: $500,000 · EnvironmentSpark Climat…Barrel Bag: $258,000 · EnvironmentBarrel Bag+5 more: $225,500 · Environment+5 more10000 BRAINS NEURO AI INC: $1,000,000 · Health10000 BRA…1907 FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL INC: $450,000 · Health1907 FOUN…MAYO CLINIC: $250,000 · HealthMAYO CLIN…THE ASSOCIATION FOR FRONTOTEMPORAL DEGENERATION: $150,000 · HealthTHE ASSOC…FOCUSED ULTRASOUND FOUNDATION: $100,000 · Health+10 more: $284,500 · Health+10 moreOCEAN VISIONS INC: $1,452,000 · Science & TechTHE BETTER ANGELS SOCIETY INC: $800,000 · Arts & CultureTHE TANK LTD: $150,000 · Arts & CultureCREATIVE VISIONS FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Arts & CultureSTAND UP WITH COMEDY: $45,000 · Arts & CultureTHE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM INC: $40,000 · Arts & Culture+5 more: $104,000 · Arts & CultureEARTHENABLE INC: $325,000 · InternationalEMPOWERS AFRICA INC: $300,000 · InternationalJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC: $75,000 · International+1 more: $10,000 · International
Other$12,010,441Education$6,535,500Environment$3,083,500Health$2,234,500Science & Tech$1,452,000Arts & Culture$1,189,000International$710,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWINDWARD FUND: $2,100,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetOCEAN VISIONS INC: $1,452,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $1,373,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetYEAR UP INC: $1,225,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTHE MILKEN INSTITUTE: $1,150,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budget10000 BRAINS NEURO AI INC: $1,000,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetTHE BETTER ANGELS SOCIETY INC: $800,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetCAREMESSAGE: $750,000 over 5y, 4.7% of budgetCollegespring Inc: $575,000 over 6y, 3.5% of budgetPEER HEALTH EXCHANGE INC: $575,000 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetSpark Climate Solutions: $500,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetDIGITAL HARBOR FOUNDATION: $500,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget1907 FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL INC: $450,000 over 3y, 31% of budgetEDUCATORS FOR EXCELLENCE INC: $350,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetLA PROMISE FUND: $350,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $325,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetEARTHENABLE INC: $325,000 over 7y, 4.4% of budgetEMPOWERS AFRICA INC: $300,000 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $300,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBarrel Bag: $258,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $250,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $225,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $201,900 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetIMAGINATION FOUNDATION: $175,000 over 2y, 27% of budgetTHE ASSOCIATION FOR FRONTOTEMPORAL DEGENERATION: $150,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetNEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM CORPORATION: $150,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE TANK LTD: $150,000 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetTIAS HOPE: $125,000 over 5y, 15% of budgetEVERYBODY DANCE LA: $125,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetFULFILLMENT FUND: $125,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetPartnership Scholars Program: $125,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetTHE PAINTED TURTLE: $100,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetSustainable Conservation: $100,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetFOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFOCUSED ULTRASOUND FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC: $75,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetSAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCREATIVE VISIONS FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHINESE PROGRESSIVE ASSOCIATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTOWER CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetHARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFARIS FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetTHE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL WILDERNESS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetEnvironmental Volunteers Inc: $40,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetTHE PEREGRINE FUND INC: $40,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WINDWARD FUND ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN VISIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds YEAR UP INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MILKEN INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds 10000 BRAINS NEURO AI INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BETTER ANGELS SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds CAREMESSAGE ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE MATCH ↗
  • Who funds Collegespring Inc ↗
  • Who funds PEER HEALTH EXCHANGE INC ↗
  • Who funds Spark Climate Solutions ↗
  • Who funds DIGITAL HARBOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds 1907 FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATORS FOR EXCELLENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds LA PROMISE FUND ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds EARTHENABLE INC ↗
  • Who funds EMPOWERS AFRICA INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Barrel Bag ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
  • Who funds PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA23.1× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Joseph Drown Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Weingart Foundation · Elbridge Stuart Foundation Dba Stuart Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · The Resslergertz Foundation · The Rosalinde and Arthur Gilbert Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kissick Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kissick Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • New England Aquarium Corporation: 12% of income from government
  • Shatterproof a Nonprofit Corporation: 2% of income from government
  • Digital Harbor Foundation: 2% of income from government
  • Uaspire Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Year Up Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Kissick Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Kissick Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 165 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kissick Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph