· Public charity
Kings Care Foundation
Support los angeles families by supporting charitable organizations and programs with shared goals of wellness, sustainability, social advocacy, and inclusion
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 10 grants below total $1,032,610 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,120,936 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $88,326 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k4 grants · $68k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $300k
- $250k+2 grants · $665k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LA | $415,000 |
| DISCOVERY CUBE LA | $250,000 |
| YMCA | $100,000 |
| THE PLAY EQUITY FUND | $100,000 |
| THRUGUIDANCE MINISTRIES INC | $50,000 |
| PLAYWORKS EDUCATION ENERGIZED | $50,000 |
| GRADES OF GREEN INC | $27,410 |
| KOREA TOWN SENIOR & COMMUNITY | $15,200 |
| DON'T EVER GIVE UP | $15,000 |
| SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DISABLED SLED HOCKEY | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $973k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +17% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.
28 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CHChildren's Hospital Los Angeles6× · 2017–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +78%
- RMRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA5× · 2017–2024 · $811k · revenue +17%
- YMYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION3× · 2017–2019 · $521k · revenue +32%
Funded once
- KIKABOOM INCone grant, 2021 · $259k · revenue -22%
- YBYMCA Ball Hockey Programone grant, 2020 · $200k
- VCVARIOUS CHARITIES 5000 OR UNDERone grant, 2018 · $155k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…
The mission of lapf is to create partnerships to provide resources and programs that help the police perform at their highest level and to enhance lapd-community relations.(see schedule o)
The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.
To advance educational equity. together with families, schools and the community, facilitate access to and opportunities for quality educational and wellness practices so that children thrive from diapers to diplomas.
Lasec works to attract, secure and support high-profile sports and entertainment events in los angeles. major events leave a lasting, positive impact on the host city and generate hundreds of millions of dollars in economic impact and…
The la conservation corps creates equitable opportunities for young people to build resilience in themselves, their communities and the environment through a program of work, education and support.
To improve the lives of young people in greater los angeles by creating impactful programs that will help them pursue their dreams while building fundamental life skills.
To surround students with a community of support, empowering them to stay in school and achieve in life. we work with public school systems, establishing relationship with superintendents, principals, educators, and community partners to…
To drive positive impact in the greater los angeles area through the transformational powers of the sports industry.
La's best provides free supervised before and after-school activities to over 15,000 children at 200 schools in los angeles unified school district (lausd).
The league of california community foundations promotes and strengthens community foundations in california. through collaboration and shared learning among member foundations and building partnerships with private and public entities, we…
Arts for la leads communities, artists and organizations to advocate for an equitable, healthy, and creative los angeles region through the arts.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Mayor's Fund for Los Angeles and the most unlike its peers is The 5 Gyres Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
74 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 74 of the 91 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds DISCOVERY SCIENCE CENTER OF LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds DISCOVERY SCIENCE CENTER OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds THE PLAY EQUITY FUND ↗
- Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angeles ↗
- Who funds KABOOM INC ↗
- Who funds SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PLAYWORKS EDUCATION ENERGIZED ↗
- Who funds THE MAYOR'S FUND FOR LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds REDONDO BEACH POLICE AND FIRE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Thru Guidance Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds GRADES OF GREEN INC ↗
- Who funds PEACE OVER VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds Wags and Walks ↗
- Who funds MAMBA & MAMBACITA SPORTS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PROJECT OPPORTUNITY ↗
- Who funds JIMMY MILLER MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREATER LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds YOU CAN PLAY ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES SPORTS COUNCIL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SOUTH BAY SPORTS HEALTH & RECREATION ↗
- Who funds HYDROCEPHALUS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds 4 PAWS 4 PATRIOTS ↗
- Who funds THE SOLA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR LOS ANGELES SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds HEAL THE BAY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · California Community Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · Great Public Schools Now · The Rose Hills Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Johnny Carson Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · United Way Inc · Pasadena Community Foundation · Weingart Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Kings Care Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Sandy Hook Promise Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Kings Care Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Kings Care Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.