How much did JOHN 316 MINISTRIES FDN WD558 grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 71% of JOHN 316 MINISTRIES FDN WD558’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k9 grants · $36k
$10k–50k19 grants · $325k

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$7.8M

Total assets

Largest grants

PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER$30,000
UNION GOSPEL MISSION OF TARRANT CNTY$30,000
CHRIST'S HAVEN FOR CHILDREN$25,000
SALVATION ARMY OF DALLAS$20,000
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH DALLAS$20,000
THE SALVATION ARMY OF FT WORTH TEXAS$20,000
BRIDGE RECOVERY$20,000
MISSION METROPLEX INC$20,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF$20,000
BEAUTIFUL FEET CHURCH SBCE$15,000
DANIEL MIGAEL FOUNDATION INC$15,000
FAMILY GATEWAY INC$15,000
INTERFAITH FAMILY SERVICES$15,000
THE NET$10,000
CITYSQUARE$10,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $121k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.8M · 31 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +96% since the first grant, against +53% for the ones you funded once.

31 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.8M

$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+96%

+53%

Still filing today

52%

50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterHealthFood & NutritionReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CH
CHRIST'S HAVEN FOR CHILDREN
5× · 2020–2024 · $125k · revenue +58%
MM
MISSION METROPLEX INC
5× · 2020–2024 · $100k · revenue +122%
FG
FAMILY GATEWAY INC
5× · 2020–2024 · $75k · revenue +201%

Funded once

JF
JPS Foundationgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +53%
BS
Baylor Scott & White All Saints
one grant, 2020 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Family Promise of Irving

Support services to help return homeless families to self sufficiency through case management and temporary housing provided by a network of local churches.

Human Services

The Houston Food Bank

The mission is to provide food for better lives. last year we provided 123 million nutritious meals in 18 counties through our 1,600 community partners.

—

Arlington Community Food Bank

The Arlington Community Food Bank's mission is to help end hunger in our community at its root cause.

Human Services

Christian Homes of Abilene Inc

To change lives and build Christian families through maternity, foster, and adoption services.

Human Services

Feed Lake Highlands Inc

Feed Lake Highlands helps families in the Lake Highlands community of Northeast Dallas who are striving to attain economic sufficiency by ministering with them to address their educational, physical, and spiritual needs.

Human Services

Family Promise of Collin County

Family promise is part of a national organization that provides food, shelter, and support services during resettlement of homeless families in church facilities and temporary housing. we also provide cars for our guests to drive to work…

Human Services

Fort Worth Area Habitat for Humanity

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

Housing & Shelter

Fort Worth Hope Center

The mission of the Fort Worth Hope Center is to fight hunger and feed hope by meeting peoples' immediate nutrition needs while also helping as many as possible to become self-sufficient.

Human Services

Bread for Our Children

Provide nutrition meals for communities in the Dallas/Ft Worth, Texas areas

—

Homeless Coalition of Dallas

Provide food and clothing to homeless in Dallas and Carrolton area

Human Services

Dallas Area Habitat for Humanity Inc

Construction of quality, affordable housing in the dallas area.

—

Arlington Charities Inc

The organization provides food and other supportive services to local residents in arlington, texas who are in need of assistance.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cornerstone Assistance Network Inc and the most unlike its peers is Jps Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

17/18

Grantees still filing

15/18

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,268,000Human Services$196,000Philanthropy$105,000Housing & Shelter$75,000Health$75,000Food & Nutrition$50,000Religion$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX29.3× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · America's Charities · Paul E Andrews Jr Foundation · Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo · United Way of Tarrant County · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Norman M Kronick Fort Worth Foundation · Martha Sue Parr Trust Xxxxx6005 · The Junior League of Fort Worth Inc · The Ninnie L Baird Foundation · The Rees-Jones Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation JOHN 316 MINISTRIES FDN WD558 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: DANIEL MIGAEL FOUNDATION INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~1 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.1× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 463723564 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on DANIEL MIGAEL FOUNDATION INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 1 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 14% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to John 316 Ministries Fdn Wd558?

Find your warmest path to John 316 Ministries Fdn Wd558 through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

JOHN 316 MINISTRIES FDN WD558

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to John 316 Ministries Fdn Wd558?

More from the funding graph

JOHN 316 MINISTRIES FDN WD558

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to John 316 Ministries Fdn Wd558?

More from the funding graph