· Public charity
The Junior League of Fort Worth Inc
The Junior League of Fort Worth, Inc.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 7 grants below total $351,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,122,327 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $771,327 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k4 grants · $115k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $236k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF | $100,000 |
| THE WOMENS CENTER OF TARRANT | $80,000 |
| FORT WORTH ZOO | $56,000 |
| COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE OF TEXAS | $35,000 |
| UNBOUND NORTH TEXAS | $35,000 |
| ACADEMY4 | $25,000 |
| LAUNDRY LOVE FORT WORTH | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $460k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
21 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TPTHE PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF TARRANT COUNTY4× · 2017–2025 · $325k · revenue +1%
- TWTHE WOMEN'S CENTER OF TARRANT COUNTY INC4× · 2019–2025 · $310k · revenue +38%
- ACACH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES7× · 2017–2025 · $292k · revenue +150%
Funded once
- CFCAMP FIRE FIRST TEXASone grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue +19%
- MMMOTHERS MILK BANK OF NORTH TEXAS INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue +66%
- TNTHE NET FW INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +74%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.
Communitycare operates 25 health center locations offering comprehensive primary care services for the entire family including pediatrics, behavioral health services, and dental care.
Our mission is to empower young women and men to make a positive decision about their unplanned pregnancy.
With more than 1 million patient visits each year, Children's Health is North Texas' leading pediatric health system and among the largest in the nation. For more than a century, our mission has been clear: make life better for children.…
The mission of Dallas County Family Resource Center is to provide programs to improve the quality of resources and well-being of the children and families in the community by intake, assessment, and referral of those in need to available…
Texans Care for Children shapes public policies and brings Texans together to make children a statewide priority. We work so kids can have what they need to be healthy, secure, and thriving and so every Texan can have the best start to…
Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Family Planning and Preventative Health provides comprehensive and complementary health care services in settings that preserve and protect the essential privacy and rights of the individual, advocates…
The mission of the Fort Worth Hope Center is to fight hunger and feed hope by meeting peoples' immediate nutrition needs while also helping as many as possible to become self-sufficient. To this end, we provide both groceries and household…
Women's Health and Family Planning Association of Texas ("WHFPT") is dedicated to the belief that all Texans deserve the right to determine the number, timing, and spacing of their children through access to affordable, confidential,…
Support law enforcement and promote public safety awareness and crime prevention in Fort Worth.
TexProtects advances public policy and local implementation to strenghten families to prevent child abuse and neglect.
The mission of the Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council is to drive evidence-based improvement in patient care and health equity throughout the region.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of North Texas and the most unlike its peers is Better Vision Better Hope. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
63 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF TARRANT COUNTY ↗
- Who funds THE WOMEN'S CENTER OF TARRANT COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds ACH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Better Vision Better Hope ↗
- Who funds Wings of Hope Equitherapy ↗
- Who funds THE FORT WORTH ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds UnBound North Texas ↗
- Who funds CAMP FIRE FIRST TEXAS ↗
- Who funds MOTHERS MILK BANK OF NORTH TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds Community Healthcare of Texas ↗
- Who funds THE NET FW INC ↗
- Who funds Union Gospel Mission of Tarrant County ↗
- Who funds Van Cliburn Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds WI Cook Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Historic Fort Worth Inc ↗
- Who funds FORT WORTH DROWNING PREVENTION COALITION ↗
- Who funds JPS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds YOUTH ORCHESTRA OF GREATER FORT WORTH ↗
- Who funds JUSTINS PLACE ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER TARRANT COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds CASA MANANA INC ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY STOREHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds FORTRESS YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds TEXAS ACADEMY 4 ↗
- Who funds DREAM PARK ↗
- Who funds FORT WORTH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF NORTH TEXAS ↗
- Who funds THE LADDER ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds LAUNDRY LOVE FORT WORTH INC ↗
- Who funds GIRLS ON THE RUN OF THE DFW METROPLEX ↗
- Who funds LENA POPE HOME INC ↗
- Who funds UNBOUND NOW ↗
- Who funds FORT WORTH JUNIOR GOLF FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CRISTO REY FORT WORTH CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds RIVERTREE ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds Tarrant Area Food Bank ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · United Way of Tarrant County · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Amon G Carter Foundation · Sid W Richardson Foundation · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · The Morris Foundation · The Rees-Jones Foundation · Paul E Andrews Jr Foundation · Garvey Texas Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Junior League of Fort Worth Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.