· Private foundation
James L White Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k10 grants · $43k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHAFFEY COMMUNITY OF ARTS | $10,000 |
| SAN ANTONIO REGIONAL HOSPITAL WOMENS BREAST & IMAGING CENTER | $10,000 |
| OPARC | $8,000 |
| WEST END AUXILIARY OF CHILDREN'S FUND | $5,000 |
| PACIFIC LIFELINE | $5,000 |
| ONTARIO CHRISTIAN SCHOOL | $5,000 |
| VNA HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA | $5,000 |
| HOUSE OF RUTH INC | $5,000 |
| AGINGNEXT INC | $3,000 |
| MEGAN'S WINGS INC | $3,000 |
| SERVICE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIFE | $2,000 |
| CROSSROADS INC | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $117k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
21 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OOPARC9× · 2017–2025 · $54k · revenue +58%
- STSHOES THAT FIT7× · 2017–2024 · $29k · revenue +149%
- LILMWS INC5× · 2018–2025 · $23k · revenue +130%
Funded once
- AWAVON WALK FOR BREAST CANCERone grant, 2017 · $10k
- FOFRIENDS OF THE ONTARIO CHAFFEY COMMUNITY SHOW BANDone grant, 2024 · $10k
- LKLeaven Kidsgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue +159%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Survivor's ince. provides responsive, comprehensive, confidential and client driven and client focused services to those experiencing sexual abuse, domestic violence, human trafficking and stalking. the services provided include: a fully…
Provide a caring, advocating, safe, and educationally based environment for survivors of domestic violence and sexual assault.
Residential Services, Inc. provides living options and related supports to people with intellectual and developmental disabilities of all ages.
To provide substance abuse prevention & treatment.
See schedule oadvancing physical and emotional safety by reducing the impact and occurrence of sexual and domestic violence, human trafficking and stalking through inclusive intervention and prevention services for children, youth, and…
To operate residential and non-residential programs for victims of domestic violence.
The crossroads provides housing and intensive support services for women with co-occurring mental and addictive disorders working towards self sufficiency. all clients have a diagnosis appropriate for comprehensive community support…
Familylinks is one of the pittsburgh area's largest and most comprehensive human service providers. serving the most vulnerable members of our community, familylinks provides services in mental health, substance use, service coordination,…
W.O.M.A.N., Inc. supports survivors of domestic violence and their loved ones along their healing journeys, bridging value rich networks designed to address intersections of violence. In all our work, we strive to continually increase our…
The mission of Family Services is to help children, adults, and families throughout Tulare County heal from violence and thrive in healthy relationships. Family Services will accomplish this mission through direct services, advocacy,…
To provide safety and empowerment to victims of domestic violence and sexual assault and to work to eliminate sexual victimization and domestic violence through shelter, treatment, education and social change.
Aims to reduce countywide homelessness while addressing each family's personal struggle with perpetuating homelessness and poverty in their children. Provides both transitional shelter and rapid re-housing options in addition to…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Project Sister Family Services and the most unlike its peers is Crossroads Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds OPARC ↗
- Who funds MEGAN'S WINGS INC ↗
- Who funds SHOES THAT FIT ↗
- Who funds LMWS INC ↗
- Who funds FOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds WEST END YMCA ↗
- Who funds HOUSE OF RUTH INC ↗
- Who funds VNACARE ↗
- Who funds CROSSROADS INC ↗
- Who funds AGINGNEXT INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT SISTER FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Service Center for Independent Life ↗
- Who funds Leaven Kids ↗
- Who funds Travelers Aid of the Inland Empire ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Ontario Community Foundation · Inland Empire Community Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Price Foundation Inc · Inland Empire United Way · The Rose Hills Foundation · Union Pacific Foundation · The Rauch Family Foundation · Majestic Realty Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · Shelter Partnership Inc · Weingart Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization James L White Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.