Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Price Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$37k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$127kHuman Services$61kHousing & Shelter$48kHealth$35kCommunity Improvement$15kReligion$10kPhilanthropy$10kEmployment$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $22k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Chaffey College$12,048
San Antonio Hospital Foundation$10,000
Inland Valley Hope Partners$5,000
Pacific Lifeline$5,000
Samaritan Conseling Center$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Samaritan Conseling Center: $5k → 14%WARRIOR FOR CHILDREN: $5k → 14%OPARC: $5k → 14%OPARC: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$414k · 7 repeat orgs$98k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +53% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
18

Total granted

$414k
$93k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+21%

Still filing today

43%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2017–2019 · $198k
  • CC
    CHAFFEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT
    9× · 2017–2025 · $114k
  • IV
    INLAND VALLEY COUNCIL OF CHURCHES
    5× · 2019–2025 · $37k

Funded once

  • CC
    Chaffey College Price Foundation Emergency Fund
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • LB
    LIFE BIBLE FELLOWSHIP INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • RC
    ROTARY CLUB OF UPLAND FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +21%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Westcare California Inc

To provide substance abuse prevention & treatment.

Health
2
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
3
United Health Centers of the San Joaquin

The organization is committed to the lifetime wellness of the communities by providing accessible, comprehensive quality health care to everyone with compassion and respect, regardless of ability to pay.

Health
4
Family Health Centers of San Diego Inc

Fhcsd's primary mission is to provide comprehensive, accessible and quality health care services to all income levels with a special committment to low income medically underserved individuals.

Health
5
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
6
South Central Family Health Center

To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.

Health
7
Upmc Western Maryland Corporation

The mission of upmc western maryland is to serve our community by providing outstanding patient care and to shape tomorrow's health system through clinical & technological innovation, research and education.

Health
8
San Fernando Community Hospital

Provides primary care, oral health, and behavioral health care, including health education to the community without regard to the ability to pay for services.

Health
9
Axis Community Health Inc

To provide health care, behavioral health services and support services to the residents of the tri-valley area surrounding communities in eastern alameda county, california.axis community health inc.'s mission is to provide quality,…

Health
10
Almaden Valley Counseling Service Inc

Avcs is committed to meeting the mental health concerns of all ages with an emphasis on youth. avcs offers a full range of counseling services which supports and promotes personal growth, positive family relationships and emotional…

Health
11
Watts Healthcare Corporation

To operate a medical clinics and shall promote health and other programs within the city of los angeles and the immediately surrounding areas.

Health
12
Upvalley Family Centers of Napa County

The mission of the UpValley Family Centers is to provide guidance, support and resources in the community, in the home and for the individual so that everyone can achieve a better life. We serve youth, adults and families in the…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lmws Inc and the most unlike its peers is Adonai. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $198,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHAFFEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT — $113,548 · OtherCHAFFEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICTINLAND VALLEY COUNCIL OF CHURCHES — $37,000 · OtherINLAND VALLEY COUNCIL OF CHURCHESFAMILY FOOTHILL SHELTER — $33,000 · OtherFAMILY FOOTHILL SHELTER+14 more — $79,200 · Other+14 moreSan Antonio Hospital Foundation Inc — $15,000 · HealthVNACARE — $5,000 · HealthOPARC — $7,500 · Human ServicesWARRIOR FOR CHILDREN — $5,000 · Human ServicesSAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER — $5,000 · Human ServicesROTARY CLUB OF UPLAND FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · EducationUPLAND HIGHLAND REGIMENT BOOSTERS INC — $2,000 · EducationADONAI — $2,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$460,748Health$20,000Human Services$17,500Education$12,000Food & Nutrition$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSan Antonio Hospital Foundation Inc — $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLMWS INC — $10,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF UPLAND FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetOPARC — $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWEST END YMCA — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWARRIOR FOR CHILDREN — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetVNACARE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADONAI — $2,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetUPLAND HIGHLAND REGIMENT BOOSTERS INC — $2,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds San Antonio Hospital Foundation Inc
  • Who funds LMWS INC
  • Who funds ROTARY CLUB OF UPLAND FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds OPARC
  • Who funds WEST END YMCA
  • Who funds WARRIOR FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds FOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER INC
  • Who funds SAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER
  • Who funds VNACARE
  • Who funds ADONAI
  • Who funds UPLAND HIGHLAND REGIMENT BOOSTERS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Inland Empire Community FoundationCA21.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Inland Empire Community Foundation · James L White Foundation · Ontario Community Foundation · The Rauch Family Foundation · Inland Empire United Way · Columbus Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Price Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph