· Private foundation
The Rauch Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k8 grants · $38k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $276k
- $50k–250k21 grants · $2.3M
- $250k+14 grants · $12M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE AMERICAN RED CROSS - INLAND EMPIRE BLOOD CLINIC | $2,500,000 |
| WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA | $1,500,000 |
| HELEN KELLER THROUGH GIVEWELL- VIT A SUPPLEMENTATION (MADAGASCAR PROJECT) | $1,500,000 |
| PROVIDENCE ST MARY MEDICAL CENTER | $1,001,055 |
| CARTER CENTER - 20222023 TRACHOMA INTERVENTIONS IN SUDAN PROJECT | $1,000,000 |
| DIGNITY HEALTH - SBMC | $1,000,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $880,000 |
| GIVEWELL - THE CLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE (CHAI) | $800,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $500,000 |
| FEEDING AMERICA RIVERSIDE & SAN BERNARDINO COUNTIES | $500,000 |
| CALIFORNIA UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE & MEDICINE (CUSM) | $270,400 |
| ARROWHEAD REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION | $250,000 |
| DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS | $250,000 |
| GLOBALGIVING - 2024 HURRICANE BERYL RELIEF FUND | $250,000 |
| LA PHILHARMONIC ASSOCATION FBO YOLA | $200,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $5.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.
67 repeat relationships — 42 still active in FY2024, 25 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5.8M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
DUKE UNIVERSITY3× · 2017–2021 · $31M · revenue +51%
FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC3× · 2022–2024 · $3.9M · revenue +4%- TCTHE CARTER CENTER INC5× · 2020–2024 · $2.8M · revenue +25%
Funded once
- SASAN ANTONIO REGIONAL HOSPITALgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $1.0M · revenue +29%
- GCGIVEWELLAKATHE CLEAR FUND- MALARIA CONSORTIUMone grant, 2022 · $750k
- ACA COMMUNITY OF FRIENDSone grant, 2022 · $500k · revenue +21%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.
To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.
Our mission is to help people keep well in body, mind, and spirit by providing quality health care services in a safe, compassionate environment.
The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.
Support significant improvements in health care delivery and outcomes within the context of nonprofit, charitable ownership.
To support salem health, salem health west valley and related organizations.
To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.
City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION
Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.
Our mission is to help people keep well in body, mind, and spirit by providing quality health care services in a safe, compassionate environment.
The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.
Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Evidence Action and the most unlike its peers is Phillips Exeter Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 122 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds THE CARTER CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FEEDING AMERICA RIVERSIDE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTIES ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO REGIONAL HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds ARROWHEAD REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE THROUGH HOUSING FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds A COMMUNITY OF FRIENDS ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES MASTER CHORALE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds BRIGHT PROSPECT ↗
- Who funds PILGRIM PLACE ↗
- Who funds Pomona Valley Hospital Medical Center ↗
- Who funds LIGHTHOUSE SOCIAL SERVICE CENTERS ↗
- Who funds LMWS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Inland Empire Community Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Mufg Union Bank Foundation Ag · California Community Foundation · Inland Empire United Way · The Annenberg Foundation · Ontario Community Foundation · Union Pacific Foundation · Edwards Lifesciences Foundation · Orange County Community Foundation · Price Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Rauch Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.