Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

OPARC

OPARC (California) receives grants from 21 organizations whose IRS filings report $3,915,853 to it, the largest being John Gogian Family Foundation ($2,578,703). 16 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$21M
Funders on record
21
Grants received
$3.9M
Net assets
$20M
16/21 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 13%
01What it does

What Oparc does

Mission

Our mission is to support, employ, and transform the lives of individuals with disabilities. We ensure that people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (idd) have access to training, employment, and social opportunities, fostering a world where they are valued community members. Oparc has been at the forefront of providing comprehensive services and advocating for the rights and inclusion of individuals with idd since 1950.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Business services provides employment with competitive rates to individuals who are vocationally disabled and, therefore, are not yet able to meet the business requirements of the competitive labor market. In an industrial work setting, job skills and behavior training are provided to help prepare the participant for competitive employment or progression to other vocational programs. This program includes a supported employment program, which places people with disabilities into competitive employment within the community. A job coach provides training and continuing support for the participant while in the program. Business services also includes the Oparc explore program. Oparc explore provides the opportunity for individuals who want to explore community options, explore transitioning from a work activity program or who are currently employed but want additional activities such as: volunteering, building job placement skills, technology, community engagement, exploration, and adult living skills.

    $6,814,924 spent$2,049,454 earned by the program
    43% of program spending
  2. Adult development centers (adc's) are located in montclair, ontario, rancho cucamonga, and monte vista. These centers offer vocational skills and community life training to adults with disabilities. Training programs are individually designed for clients to help them integrate into community adult life and/or obtain integrated employment, improve their ability to communicate, and participate in leisure/recreational activities. Activities and trainings are done, if possible, in a natural environment, including the local community and businesses. Attainment of skills increase the clients' ability to participate more fully in their community with greater competency and a feeling of personal satisfaction.

    $4,874,060 spent
    31% of program spending
  3. Summit services provides specialized support and training to people with developmental and behavior challenges. Goals of the program include learning new social skills, reducing behavioral incidents, and developing the capacity to work in and enjoy the local community. Desired outcomes include increased self-respect, increased ability to interact with other people in an effective manner, and transition to other programs in which less intensive support is required.

    $3,718,418 spent$46,990 earned by the program
    24% of program spending
  4. Oparc connect provides additional transportation options for individuals with disabilities who are working and/or want to be active participants in community life.

    $377,532 spent
    2% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $15,784,934.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($13M) Expenses 100 ($12M) Net assets 100 ($7.7M)2018 Revenue 106 ($14M) Expenses 105 ($13M) Net assets 110 ($8.6M)2019 Revenue 112 ($15M) Expenses 106 ($13M) Net assets 128 ($9.9M)2020 Revenue 106 ($14M) Expenses 107 ($13M) Net assets 135 ($10M)2021 Revenue 103 ($13M) Expenses 84 ($10M) Net assets 177 ($14M)2022 Revenue 120 ($16M) Expenses 95 ($12M) Net assets 216 ($17M)2023 Revenue 122 ($16M) Expenses 116 ($14M) Net assets 241 ($19M)2024 Revenue 126 ($16M) Expenses 134 ($17M) Net assets 243 ($19M)2025 Revenue 158 ($21M) Expenses 158 ($20M) Net assets 263 ($20M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (158)Expenses (158)Net assets (263)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $13M to $17M (+26%).

$11M
$9.8M
$11M
$13M
$17M
$18M
$21M
$21M
$24M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 85% · 2018 85% · 2019 83% · 2020 88% · 2021 92% · 2022 87% · 2023 2% · 2024 4% · 2025 4%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

88% of OPARC’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (21% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 3,400 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$562k
’17
$814k
’18
$1.3M
’19
$542k
’20
$3.1M
’21
$3.7M
’22
$1.5M
’23
−$343k
’24
$928k
’25
3.1
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Susan Pittman

CEO

Board chair

Scott Tremayne

Chairman

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

The chief executive listed changed between the FY2024 and FY2025 filings.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed182018171718202321
Joined·+8+1+2+5+7+6+6+5
No longer listed·63356437
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base held at 9 funders, grant income rose $184k → $2.1M.

4 of 21 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 8% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of OPARC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

OPARC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 66% of grant income and the top three 78%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

66%
largest funder
78%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 37% · 2018 60% · 2019 39% · 2020 47% · 2021 71% · 2022 74% · 2023 90% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

50% of OPARC's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 76% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

90% of OPARC's grant income comes from California funders.

IL
NV
PA
CA
MO
NC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $295k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

OPARC runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 2,297 human services nonprofits its size.

Operating margin5% · above the median
Months of reserve3.1mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)6% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,297 human services nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2025

Organizations like OPARC

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

80% of spending goes to programs.

Program 80%Management 18%Fundraising 2%

Governance

15
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

97%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for OPARC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds OPARC?
OPARC (California) receives grants from 21 organizations whose IRS filings report $3,915,853 to it, the largest being John Gogian Family Foundation ($2,578,703). 16 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does OPARC have?
IRS filings report 21 organizations giving $3,915,853 in grants to OPARC, 16 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of OPARC?
John Gogian Family Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $2,578,703 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like OPARC find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Oparc →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 21 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing