· Private foundation
Hylant Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k45 grants · $97k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $184k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $568k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BUTLER UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF ADVANCEMENT | $200,000 |
| METROPARKS TOLEDO FOUNDATION - WILDWOOD PRESERVE | $100,000 |
| PROMEDICA FOUNDATION | $93,000 |
| TOLEDO MUSEUM OF ART | $75,000 |
| HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| CHERRY STREET MISSION | $50,000 |
| YMCA OF GREATER TOLEDO | $30,000 |
| ST JOHN'S JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL | $27,500 |
| FIRST TEE - GREATER DETROIT | $21,500 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS - DISASTER RELIEF | $17,500 |
| THE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION | $17,500 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS OF NW OHIO CHAPTER | $10,000 |
| TOLEDO ALLIANCE FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS | $10,000 |
| MIAMI UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| FIRST TEE OF LAKE ERIE LLC | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $288k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 7% of Hylant Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 77% of the giving stays in OH; read by stated purpose it is 74% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.
84 repeat relationships — 40 still active in FY2024, 44 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $77k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TTTHE TOLEDO MUSEUM OF ART7× · 2017–2024 · $350k · revenue +34%
HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC3× · 2020–2024 · $150k · revenue +118%- CSCHERRY STREET MISSION MINISTRIES6× · 2018–2024 · $150k · revenue +7%
Funded once
- MPMETROPOLITAN PARK DISTRICT OF TOLEDOone grant, 2022 · $100k
- TNTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY - OHIO CHAPTERone grant, 2021 · $25k
- TSTOLEDO SCHOOL FOR THE ARTSone grant, 2021 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the university of toledo foundation is to secure the future for the university of toledo, through prudent asset management and philanthropy. we build strong linkages between alumni and the university, fostering a spirit of…
Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…
To lead and equip ohio philanthropy to be effective partners for change in our communities.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
The lafayette general foundation was created to support lafayette general health (lgh), acadiana's only community-owned, nonprofit health system. we exist to help fulfill lgh's mission, to restore, maintain, and improve health. our role is…
The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.
To harness the collective expertise of ohio's ceos to advocate for policies that improve ohio's economic competitiveness.
The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.
To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.
Delta dental fund's mission is to improve the oral health of the public and to advance dental science and the dental profession through research and education.
The organization was organized for the benefit and support of its related 501(c)(3) health care entities which provide medical care to restore, maintain and improve the health of the community in which it serves.
To improve the human condition through excellence in patient care and medical discovery.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Local Initiatives Support Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Carsons Crew and Kennedy Too. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
122 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 122 of the 205 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PROMEDICA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE TOLEDO MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHERRY STREET MISSION MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds Damar Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds OTTAWA HILLS SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Miami University Foundation ↗
- Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Toledo ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE MENTORS FOR KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LOURDES UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE ARTS COMMISSION OF GREATER TOLEDO I ↗
- Who funds THE OHIO FOUNDATION OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES ↗
- Who funds BLACK SWAMP BIRD OBSERVATORY ↗
- Who funds TOLEDO PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER TOLEDO ↗
- Who funds SPENCER EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WESTERN RESERVE ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF NORTHWESTERN OHIO ↗
- Who funds OWENS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Toledo Community Foundation Inc · The O-I Charities Foundation · George Isaac Foundation · Toledo Classic Inc · John Henry Eldred Jr Foundation · Promedica Health System Inc · Bon Secours Mercy Health Foundation · Walter E Terhune Memorial Fund · Robert C and Susan M Savage Family Foundation · The Stranahan Supporting Organization · The Mark S Feldstein and Sandra a Feldstein · United Way of Greater Toledo
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hylant Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Cal Ripken Sr Foundation Inc — 12% of income from government
- Als Therapy Development Foundation Inc — 8% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.