· Public charity
Toledo Classic Inc
Toledo classic, inc.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $300k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NATIONWIDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL - TOLEDO | $200,000 |
| PROMEDICA FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES | $50,000 |
| MAUMEE VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $20,000 |
| TOLEDO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION - JAMIE FARR SCHOLARSHIP FUND | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $490k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 9% of Toledo Classic Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 96% of the giving stays in OH; read by stated purpose it is 90% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.
16 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCCHALLENGED CHAMPIONS EQUESTRIAN CENTER INC2× · 2017–2021 · $89k · revenue +54%
- MVMAUMEE VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY3× · 2021–2024 · $80k · revenue +63%
- RFREAD FOR LITERACY INC2× · 2018–2022 · $70k · revenue +28%
Funded once
- RTRAISE THE BAR HANCOCK COUNTYone grant, 2018 · $154k · revenue +11% · 30% of their budget
- OJOHIO JUNIOR GOLF ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2021 · $106k · revenue -11%
- BVBlanchard Valley Health Systemone grant, 2019 · $67k · revenue +21%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To advocate for an equitable ohio for people with disabilities.
We are the premier childrens mental health agency that reduces the suffering experienced by children who have emotional problems related to depression, anxiety, and behavior like adhd. untreated, these problems can lead to failure in…
To provide children of working and student parents with quality, affordable childcare programs devoted to enhancing the child's educational, social, emotional, and physical development. to provide also the parent with the childcare…
The ohio coalition for the education of children with disabilities is a collaboration of parents, professionals, and partners advocating for children with disabilities to receive the educational services, experiences, and supports they…
Empowering and strengthening ohio's people (esop) helps adults in all stages of life achieve and maintain financial wellness and housing stability.
To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.
To empower people with developmental disabilities to experience the fullest life possible by providing person-centered supports which enable them to integrate into a variety of settings within their community
Provide services to people with disabilities. such services include assistance with housing, employment, transportation and recreational issues.
Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.
The ohio district 5 area agency on aging, inc. provides leadership, collaboration, coordination and services to older adults, people with disabilities, their caregivers and resource networks that support individual choice, independence and…
Columbus early learning centers (celc) has over 130 years of history providing high quality, affordable early learning and childcare in central ohio. this rich history places celc amongst the oldest early childcare programs in the country.…
To help individuals and families achieve economic self-sufficiency and emotional stability.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Diabetes Youth Services and the most unlike its peers is Sara's Garden. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
108 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 108 of the 118 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF NORTHWEST OHIO ↗
- Who funds TOLEDO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds RAISE THE BAR HANCOCK COUNTY ↗
- Who funds OHIO JUNIOR GOLF ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds CHALLENGED CHAMPIONS EQUESTRIAN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MAUMEE VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds READ FOR LITERACY INC ↗
- Who funds Blanchard Valley Health System ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF CASAGAL OF HANCOCK COUNTY ↗
- Who funds TOLEDO SEAGATE FOODBANK INC ↗
- Who funds FINDLAY HOPE HOUSE FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
- Who funds HEARTBEAT OF TOLEDO INC ↗
- Who funds TOLEDO COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BUCYRUS-TIFFIN INC ↗
- Who funds GOOD GRIEF OF NORTHWEST OHIO INC ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL ON DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INC DBA OPEN ARMS ↗
- Who funds PROMEDICA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FAMILY AND CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION CENTER ↗
- Who funds LUCAS COUNTY CASA ADVISORY BOARD INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S RIGHTS COLLABORATIVE OF NORTHWEST OHIO ↗
- Who funds BITTERSWEET INC ↗
- Who funds GEARY FAMILY YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF FOSTORIA OHIO ↗
- Who funds TUTORSMART ↗
- Who funds HISTORIC SOUTH INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF PUTNAM COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds YWCA OF NORTHWEST OHIO ↗
- Who funds JOHN COOK FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MIRACLE LEAGUE OF FINDLAY ↗
- Who funds TOLEDO SCIENCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE ABILITY CENTER OF GREATER TOLEDO ↗
- Who funds OTTAWA COUNTY FAMILY ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds AVENUES FOR AUTISM ↗
- Who funds SYLVANIA AREA FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds US TOGETHER INC ↗
- Who funds ON TARGET OUTFITTERS ↗
- Who funds THE LPGA FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Toledo Community Foundation Inc · The O-I Charities Foundation · United Way of Greater Toledo · John Henry Eldred Jr Foundation · The Stranahan Supporting Organization · Bon Secours Mercy Health Foundation · The Andersons Fund Supporting Organization · Robert C and Susan M Savage Family Foundation · Hylant Family Foundation Inc · Toledo Community Foundation Inc Seneca Fund · The Findlay-Hancock County Community Foundation · The Oswald Supporting Organization
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Toledo Classic Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.