How much did TOLEDO CLASSIC INC grant in FY2024?

Health$594kHuman Services$440kEducation$252kPhilanthropy$213kCommunity Improvement$189kFood & Nutrition$110kYouth Development$108kRecreation & Sports$94kCrime & Legal$90kOther$1.2M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

toolseducationphysicalchildemotionalyouth

2020

camphopeliteracytechnologypotentialsara's gardenmda

2021

youth mentoringtheatrecureresearchinclusivecmcgolf

2022

suppliescreatekindness roomsgrowthvolunteersneededmental

2023

sportssupportsbuild

2024

supports

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

$10k–50k2 grants · $35k
$50k–250k3 grants · $300k

$50,000

Median grant

States reached

$857k

Total assets

Largest grants

NATIONWIDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL - TOLEDO$200,000
PROMEDICA FOUNDATION$50,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES$50,000
MAUMEE VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$20,000
TOLEDO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION - JAMIE FARR SCHOLARSHIP FUND$15,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $440k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16% — the area typically sits at 9%. 90% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 8% of TOLEDO CLASSIC INC’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 96% of the giving stays in OH; read by stated purpose it is 89% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

TOLEDO CLASSIC INClessmore of its giving

Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

31%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.0M · 9 repeat orgs$2.3M to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.0M

$2.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%

+45%

Still filing today

89%

90%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

TC
TOLEDO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION - JAMIE FARR SCHOLARSHIP FUND
7× · 2018–2024 · $158k · revenue +70%
MV
MAUMEE VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
3× · 2021–2024 · $80k · revenue +297%
FH
FAMILY HOUSE
2× · 2018–2023 · $60k · revenue +34%

Funded once

RT
RAISE THE BAR- HANCOCK COgraduated
one grant, 2018 · $154k · revenue +267% · 30% of their budget
FT
FIRST TEE OF LAKE ERIEBOYS & GIRLS CLUB
one grant, 2021 · $106k · revenue -11%
BV
BLANCHARD VALLEY HEALTH SYSTEMgraduated
one grant, 2019 · $67k · revenue +46%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

OhioHealth Corporation

Our mission is to improve the health of those we serve.

Health

Life Connection of Ohio

Secure organ and tissue donors and coordinate transplant services.

Health

Ohio Disability Rights Law & Policy

To advocate for an equitable ohio for people with disabilities.

Civil Rights

Toledo Day Nursery

To provide childcare programs to working and student parents that aim to enhance the child's educational, social, emotional, and physical developement, while providing the parent with the childcare resources needed to strengthen the…

Human Services

Ohio Coalition for the Education of

The ohio coalition for the education of children with disabilities is a collaboration of parents, professionals, and partners advocating for children with disabilities to receive the educational services, experiences, and supports they…

—

The Arc of Ohio Inc

To advocate for human rights, personal dignity and community participation of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities, through legislative and social action, information and education, and local chapter support and…

—

The Toledo Hospital

The toledo hospital is an acute care facility and the adult tertiary facility of promedica health system, inc. providing inpatient and outpatient health services to the general public of northwest ohio and southeast michigan.

Health

Toledo Early Learning Coalition Incorporated

To improve early learning outcomes for children ages 0-5 by operating early learning programming and services and technical back office supports to a network of early learning centers.

—

Leadership Toledo

Through a spectrum of programming for adults and high school students, lt offers individuals the opportunity to become more confident leaders, connect with the community, grow stronger in self-awareness, and serve in ways that are…

—

Ohio Association for Gifted Children

To promote and support the development of gifted students through dissemination of information, advocacy on their behalf, encouragement of affiliate organizations and to promote research in the area of the gifted child.

—

Philanthropy Ohio

To provide leadership for organized philanthropy in ohio.

Philanthropy

Ohio Living Communities

To provide older adults with caring and quality services toward the enhancement of physical, mental and spiritual well being consistent with the christian gospel.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Diabetes Youth Services and the most unlike its peers is Young Life. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.9%1/106

the rest of the field

12%

1,343/11,534

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

06the grantee network

97 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

95/97

Grantees still filing

78/97

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,522,141Health$593,914Human Services$440,390Education$251,500Philanthropy$212,500Community Improvement$188,900Food & Nutrition$110,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Toledo Community Foundation IncOH97.1× affinity49 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Toledo Community Foundation Inc · The O-I Charities Foundation · The Andersons Fund Supporting · United Way of Greater Toledo · Promedica Health System Inc · Bon Secours Mercy Health Foundation · The Findlay-Hancock County Community · The Stranahan Supporting Organization · Hylant Family Foundation Inc · Robert C and Susan M Savage · Toledo Community Foundation Inc · The Oswald Supporting Organization

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation TOLEDO CLASSIC INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

4get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CASA- LUCAS COUNTY.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

3 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 341626339 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on CASA- LUCAS COUNTY, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 65% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Toledo Classic Inc?

Find your warmest path to Toledo Classic Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

TOLEDO CLASSIC INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

97 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Toledo Classic Inc?

More from the funding graph

TOLEDO CLASSIC INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

97 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Toledo Classic Inc?

More from the funding graph