Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Mark S Feldstein and Sandra a Feldstein

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$37k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Health$68kPhilanthropy$68kEducation$65kHuman Services$43kRecreation & Sports$36kAnimals$35kFood & Nutrition$28kHousing & Shelter$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$71k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OHIO UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$10,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER TOLEDO$5,000
MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF OHIO KENTUCKY$3,000
PROJECT IAM$3,000
FOOD FOR THOUGHT$2,500
THE BECKY WALKER SCIENCE SCHOLARSHIP INC$2,500
MOBILE MEALS$2,200
TOLEDO HUMANE SOCIETY$1,000
TOLEDO REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$1,000
MIRACLE LEAGUE OF NORTHWEST OHIO$1,000
THE ABILITY CENTER$1,000
SUNSHINE INC OF NW OHIO$1,000
THE SIGHT CENTER OF NORTHWEST OHIO$1,000
LUCAS COUNTY SPECIAL OLYMPICS$750
THE SALVATION ARMY$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COCOON SHELTER: $500 → 12%PARKERS PURPOSE: $1k → 12%PARKER'S PURPOSE: $1k → 12%LOVE SERVING AUTISM INC: $1k → 11%PARKERS PURPOSE: $700 → 12%PARKERS PURPOSE: $500 → 12%MOM'S HOUSE: $2k → 18%MOMS HOUSE: $1k → 18%MOMS HOUSE: $1k → 18%MOMS HOUSE: $1k → 18%HEARTBEAT OF TOLEDO INC: $500 → 18%SUNSHINE INC RESIDENTIAL AND SUPPORT SER: $1k → 18%SUNSHINE FOUNDATION: $1k → 18%OFF THE STREETS TOLEDO: $500 → 18%TOLEDO K9 ASSOCIATION: $500 → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
OH
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
AZ
TN
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 19% of The Mark S Feldstein and Sandra a Feldstein’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 87% of the giving stays in OH; read by stated purpose it is 71% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The Mark S Feldstein and Sandra a Feldsteinlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$245k · 40 repeat orgs$136k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +9% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

40 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
75

Total granted

$245k
$136k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
0%

Still filing today

57%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesAnimalsPhilanthropyEducationYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • The Ohio University Foundation
    5× · 2020–2025 · $45k · revenue +204%
  • CC
    COURAGEOUS COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $11k · revenue +57%
  • MM
    MOBILE MEALS
    3× · 2022–2025 · $8k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • JF
    JEWISH FEDERATION AND FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
  • HC
    HOUSEWARES CHARITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $13k · revenue -3%
  • SB
    SUSAN B KOMAN FOR THE CURE
    one grant, 2020 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Ability Center of Greater Toledo

To assist people with disabilities to live, work and socialize within a fully accessible community.

Human Services
2
Toledo Animal Shelter Association

See schedule oto care for and to provide temporary and indefinite shelter and care for homeless and abandoned dogs and cats by promoting and sponsoring animal welfare education programs, adoptions, preventive veterinary care, and a…

Animals
3
Ohio Disability Rights Law & Policy Center Inc

To advocate for an equitable ohio for people with disabilities.

Civil Rights
4
Ohio Life Sciences Association

Align the life sciences ecosystem in the state of ohio, building collaborative partnerships, and advocating for policies and funding that will help to accelerate life science priorities and drive sustainable economic growth.

Community Improvement
5
Philanthropy Ohio

To lead and equip ohio philanthropy to be effective partners for change in our communities.

Philanthropy
6
Ohio State Bar Association

The ohio state bar association (the "association") is an unincorporated voluntary non-profit organization. the association was formed to promote justice and advance the interests of the legal profession.

7
Ohio Life Sciences Foundation

The mission of ohio life sciences foundation is to accelerate bioscience discovery, innovation and commercialization of global value, driving economic growth, company attraction, improving workforce training and improved quality of life in…

Health
8
Mobile Meals Foundation

To receive gifts, devices, bequests and contributions to hold, use, and invest to ultimately distribute to the supported organization (mobile meals of toledo, inc.) or any other exempt organization to further their exempt purpose.

Food & Nutrition
9
Ohio Business Roundtable

To harness the collective expertise of ohio's ceos to advocate for policies that improve ohio's economic competitiveness.

10
Long Term Care Ombudsman

As mandated by the federal older americans act and ohio law, the mission of the long term care ombudsman program is to seek the resolution of problems and advocate for the rights of the home care consumers and residents of long- term care…

11
Toledo Science Center

Empower everyone to explore the sciences through interactive exhibits and educational programming.

Arts & Culture
12
Toledo Police Foundation

The toledo police foundation, inc. is a non-profit organization whose mission is to help the toledo police department reach its full potential while strengthening ties within the community.

Public Safety & Disaster

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Toledo Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bissell Pet Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Community Organizati…Community College Foundatio…United Way AffiliatesChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Affordable Housing Developm…Youth Sports ProgramsDomestic Violence ServicesChristian Youth CampsYouth Mentoring ProgramsSenior Support ServicesSchool District FoundationsHealth Access Advocacy and …Environmental Conservation …Community FoundationsPregnancy Support ServicesAnimal Rescue and ShelterCancer Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%3%<5yr12%14%5–10yr21%22%10–20yr14%18%20–35yr16%25%35–55yr20%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr12%7%5–10yr21%12%10–20yr14%18%20–35yr16%19%35–55yr20%44%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%2/77
the rest of the field
11%
8,036/74,229

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

69 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 69 of the 118 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
66/69
Grantees still filing
38/69
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PROJECT IAM — $25,550 · OtherPROJECT IAMJEWISH FEDERATION AND FOUNDATION — $15,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION AND FOUNDATIONSUSAN B KOMAN FOR THE CURE — $10,000 · OtherMOBILE MEALS — $8,200 · OtherFOOD FOR THOUGHT — $7,500 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF OHIO KENTUCKY — $7,500 · Other+70 more — $135,150 · Other+70 moreThe Ohio University Foundation — $45,000 · EducationThe Ohio Universi…SYLVANIA SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $10,000 · EducationSYLVANIA SCHOOLS …THE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO FOUNDATION — $7,750 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF…+1 more — $2,000 · EducationJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER TOLEDO — $25,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATI…HOUSEWARES CHARITY FOUNDATION — $13,000 · PhilanthropyHOUSEWARES CHAR…TOLEDO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $7,000 · PhilanthropyTOLEDO COMMUNIT…ANTHONY RIZZO FAMILY FOUNDATION — $5,000 · PhilanthropyANTHONY RIZZO F…GREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $3,500 · PhilanthropyGREATER HOUSTON…UNITED WAY OF GREATER TOLEDO — $2,500 · Philanthropy+3 more — $2,500 · PhilanthropyCOURAGEOUS COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $11,200 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF OH KY & IN — $5,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $4,500 · HealthTOLEDO SOCIETY FOR THE BLIND INC — $3,500 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $3,500 · Health+5 more — $4,000 · HealthTOLEDO HUMANE SOCIETY — $25,000 · AnimalsANIMAL RESCUE MISSION — $1,500 · Animals+5 more — $4,600 · AnimalsMOM'S HOUSE INC OF TOLEDO — $5,000 · Human ServicesPARKERS PURPOSE — $3,200 · Human ServicesLOVE SERVING AUTISM INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesSUNSHINE FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesHANNAH'S SOCKS INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesSUNSHINE INC RESIDENTIAL & SUPPORT SERVICES — $1,000 · Human ServicesHEARTBEAT OF TOLEDO INC — $500 · Human ServicesTHE COCOON SHELTER — $500 · Human ServicesToledo K9 Association Inc — $500 · Human ServicesOFF THE STREETS INC — $500 · Human ServicesAURORA PROJECT INC — $7,000 · Housing & ShelterLUTHERAN MINISTRIES OF MERCY INC — $500 · Housing & Shelter
Other$208,900Education$64,750Philanthropy$58,500Health$31,700Animals$31,100Human Services$14,200Housing & Shelter$7,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe Ohio University Foundation — $45,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER TOLEDO — $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTOLEDO HUMANE SOCIETY — $25,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetHOUSEWARES CHARITY FOUNDATION — $13,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCOURAGEOUS COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $11,200 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetSYLVANIA SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetMOBILE MEALS — $8,200 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO FOUNDATION — $7,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAURORA PROJECT INC — $7,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTOLEDO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSYLVANIA AREA FAMILY SERVICES INC — $6,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTOLEDO CLASSIC INC — $5,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF OH KY & IN — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTHONY RIZZO FAMILY FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMOM'S HOUSE INC OF TOLEDO — $5,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHE BECKY WALKER SCIENCE SCHOLARSHIP INC — $5,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetSYLVANIA PREVENTION ALLIANCE — $4,750 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMiracle League of Northwest Ohio Inc — $4,500 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetBITTERSWEET INC — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTOLEDO SOCIETY FOR THE BLIND INC — $3,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARKERS PURPOSE — $3,200 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetDOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF GREATER TOLEDO — $3,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetTOLEDO REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMOBILE MEALS OF TOLEDO INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGirl Scouts of Western Ohio — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEADERSHIP TOLEDO — $2,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER TOLEDO — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOURDES UNIVERSITY — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISM SOCIETY OF AMERICA — $2,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS OHIO INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBISSELL Pet Foundation — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL RESCUE MISSION — $1,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCONNECTING KIDS TO MEALS INC — $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOLD FRIENDS SENIOR DOGS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TOLEDO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOLEDO PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHISTORIC SOUTH INITIATIVE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOVE SERVING AUTISM INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROGERIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TOLEDO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATURES NURSERY CENTER FOR WILDLIFE REHAB & CONSR — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSUNSHINE FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHANNAH'S SOCKS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Toledo Community Foundation IncOH66.4× affinity32 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Toledo Community Foundation Inc · The O-I Charities Foundation · United Way of Greater Toledo · John Henry Eldred Jr Foundation · Toledo Classic Inc · Hylant Family Foundation Inc · Walter E Terhune Memorial Fund · The Andersons Fund Supporting Organization · Promedica Health System Inc · Bon Secours Mercy Health Foundation · Toledo Community Foundation Inc Seneca Fund · Jocarno Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Mark S Feldstein and Sandra a Feldstein funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    21report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 118 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph