· Private foundation
The O-I Charities Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k145 grants · $179k
- $10k–50k33 grants · $583k
- $50k–250k9 grants · $624k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TOLEDO ALLIANCE FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS | $100,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF GREATER TOLEDO | $78,405 |
| UNITED WAY OF GREATER TOLEDO | $78,405 |
| UNITED WAY OF GREATER TOLEDO | $78,405 |
| UNITED WAY OF GREATER TOLEDO | $78,405 |
| THE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO FOUNDATION | $55,000 |
| BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC | $55,000 |
| METROPARKS TOLEDO FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| CHERRY STREET MISSION MINISTRIES | $50,000 |
| JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF NORTHWESTERN OHIO INC | $40,000 |
| OCEAN CONSERVANCY INC | $35,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TOLEDO | $35,000 |
| ERIE SHORES COUNCIL BSA | $30,000 |
| PERRYSBURG HEIGHTS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION | $25,000 |
| SUNSHINE FOUNDATION INC | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $455k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.
253 repeat relationships — 106 still active in FY2024, 147 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TATOLEDO ALLIANCE FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS6× · 2019–2024 · $756k · revenue +34%
- TTTHE TOLEDO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY7× · 2017–2024 · $679k · revenue +37%
- BGBowling Green State University Foundation Inc7× · 2017–2024 · $542k · revenue +39%
Funded once
- CRCAL RIPKEN SR FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue -8%
- GWGEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY HEART & VASCULAR INSTITUTEone grant, 2019 · $40k
- IWINCARNATE WORD ACADEMYone grant, 2019 · $40k · revenue +5%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The ohio state bar association (the "association") is an unincorporated voluntary non-profit organization. the association was formed to promote justice and advance the interests of the legal profession.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
United way of central ohio is the local organization that harnesses the power of communities working together - people, nonprofits, businesses and government - to create a stronger, more equitable central ohio. see schedule o.we do this…
Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.
Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.
The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.
To improve the human condition through excellence in patient care and medical discovery.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Oh Ky & in and the most unlike its peers is Brockway Area Ambulance Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
407 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 407 of the 628 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER TOLEDO ↗
- Who funds TOLEDO ALLIANCE FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
- Who funds THE TOLEDO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Bowling Green State University Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHERRY STREET MISSION MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF NORTHWESTERN OHIO ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST OHIO SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC ↗
- Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds PERRYSBURG HEIGHTS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds THE TOLEDO MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds METROPARKS TOLEDO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TOLEDO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WESTERN RESERVE ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds ERIE SHORES COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds THE OHIO FOUNDATION OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES ↗
- Who funds DOWNTOWN TOLEDO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
- Who funds Carnegie Mellon University ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF TOLEDO AND THE TOLEDO NEWSBOYS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds SUNSHINE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds ST PAUL'S COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds THE ARTS COMMISSION OF GREATER TOLEDO I ↗
- Who funds MAUMEE VALLEY COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds The George Washington University ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds KEEP AMERICA BEAUTIFUL INC ↗
- Who funds MOM'S HOUSE INC OF TOLEDO ↗
- Who funds KEEP TOLEDOLUCAS COUNTY BEAUTIFUL INC ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS IN EDUCATION OF TOLEDO ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF TOLEDO ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HUNGER ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds KEEP OHIO BEAUTIFUL INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Toledo Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Toledo · John Henry Eldred Jr Foundation · Toledo Classic Inc · Robert C and Susan M Savage Family Foundation · The Andersons Fund Supporting Organization · The Stranahan Supporting Organization · Toledo Community Foundation Inc Seneca Fund · The Oswald Supporting Organization · Andersons Foundation · Promedica Health System Inc · Dana Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The O-I Charities Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- United Way of the Columbia-Willamette — 25% of income from government
- Oregon Food Bank — 21% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- Cal Ripken Sr Foundation Inc — 12% of income from government
- The Trustees of Princeton University — 11% of income from government
- University of Miami — 5% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.