· Private foundation
Hess Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k17 grants · $78k
- $10k–50k52 grants · $939k
- $50k–250k46 grants · $5.2M
- $250k+26 grants · $57M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE | $20,150,000 |
| STEPPINGSTONE FOUNDATION | $5,333,333 |
| HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL | $5,150,000 |
| COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS OF PHILADELPHIA | $5,000,000 |
| LINCOLN CTR FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS | $4,350,000 |
| PHILADELPHIA ORCHESTRA | $4,000,000 |
| CENTER FOR STRATEGIC & INTERNATIONAL STUDIES | $2,000,000 |
| FRANKLIN INSTITUTE | $1,600,000 |
| CP 2023 | $1,500,000 |
| PARK AVENUE SYNAGOGUE | $1,150,000 |
| MUSEUM ASSOCIATES | $1,100,000 |
| USTA FOUNDATION INCORPORATED | $1,000,000 |
| EJS PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION | $550,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF GREATER HOUSTON | $500,000 |
| KODE WITH KLOSSY INC | $500,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $6.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
202 repeat relationships — 99 still active in FY2024, 103 since wound down; 38 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PMPHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART8× · 2017–2024 · $34M · revenue +14%
- LCLINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC7× · 2017–2023 · $19M · revenue +45%
PHILADELPHIA ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION8× · 2017–2024 · $13M · revenue +52%
Funded once
- TRTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITYgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $2.0M · revenue +33%
- SOSTATUE OF LIBERTY ELLIS ISLAND FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2019 · $2.0M · revenue +9%
- UNUSTA NATIONAL TENNIS CENTER INCORPORATEDgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $1.0M · revenue +51%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.
Pidc plans and implements economic development initiatives (see schedule o) which enhance the competitive environment, generate jobs and produce higher tax ratables throughout philadelphia.
Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…
To bring quality public television programs and resources to communities throughout new jersey and its tri-state neighbors. its content, both on-air and online, aims to reflect the diverse
Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.
New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Culturetrust Greater Philadelphia and the most unlike its peers is NORTH10 Philadelphia. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
258 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 258 of the 365 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds LINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF DEERFIELD ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR STRATEGIC AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES ↗
- Who funds WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART ↗
- Who funds STEPPINGSTONE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds STEPPINGSTONE SCHOLARS INC ↗
- Who funds USTA FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds HEIGHTS PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM ASSOCIATES ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HOME ↗
- Who funds KING'S ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S NATIONAL ↗
- Who funds United Way of Greater Houston ↗
- Who funds THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds STATUE OF LIBERTY ELLIS ISLAND FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF CALDER GARDENS ↗
- Who funds FILM AT LINCOLN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BARNARD COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds Eisenhower Exchange Fellowships Incorporated ↗
- Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI ↗
- Who funds SPONSORS FOR EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY INC ↗
- Who funds USTA NATIONAL TENNIS CENTER INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds FREE LIBRARY OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JACKSON HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds RYAN'S CASE FOR SMILES ↗
- Who funds Philabundance ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The William Penn Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · Independence Foundation · Connelly Foundation · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · The Barra Foundation Inc · The Neubauer Family Foundation · The Pew Charitable Trusts · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Lindback Cr & Mf Foundation Tw Main · The Daniel B and Florence E Green Foundation · Jewish Federation of Greater Philadelphia
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hess Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Kristi House Inc — 49% of income from government
- Mercy Corps — 47% of income from government
- Stone Soup Pdx — 20% of income from government
- The Trustees of Princeton University — 11% of income from government
- Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
- Double Edge Theatre Productions Inc — 2% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Middlebury College — 1% of income from government
- Jackson Health Foundation Inc — 1% of income from government
- Young Audiences of New Jersey Inc — 1% of income from government
- Steppingstone Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Rutgers University Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.