· Private foundation
Henry Schein Cares Foundation Inc
The henry schein cares foundation, inc.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k14 grants · $52k
- $10k–50k24 grants · $386k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $427k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NATIONAL DENTAL ASSOCIATION | $162,000 |
| NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION | $60,000 |
| HEART TO HEART INTERNATIONAL | $55,250 |
| HARVARD SCHOOL OF DENTAL MEDICINE | $50,000 |
| MEDSHARE INTERNATIONAL | $50,000 |
| NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FREE & CHARITABLE CLINICS | $50,000 |
| PARTNERSHIP FOR QUALITY MEDICAL DONATIONS PQMD | $35,000 |
| INSTITUTE FOR EXCEPTIONAL CARE | $25,000 |
| SANTA FE GROUP | $25,000 |
| SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC | $25,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL COLLEGE OF DENTISTS (ICD) SECTION XX | $23,000 |
| DIRECT RELIEF INTERNATIONAL | $20,000 |
| AMERICARES | $20,000 |
| ADS INSTITUTE FOR DENTAL SAFETY & SCIENCE | $20,000 |
| ALPHA OMEGA FOUNDATION | $18,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $359k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 6% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.
67 repeat relationships — 34 still active in FY2025, 33 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $126k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NDNATIONAL DENTAL ASSOCIATION INC5× · 2021–2025 · $548k · revenue +43%
- HTHEART TO HEART INTERNATIONAL INC9× · 2017–2025 · $432k · revenue +151%
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC4× · 2019–2024 · $350k · revenue +16%
Funded once
- UOUNIVERSITY OF THE PEOPLEgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $75k · revenue +379%
LOCAL START DENTAL INCone grant, 2022 · $75k · revenue -22%- CUCITY UNIVERSITY OF NY PUBLIC HEALTH- SPHone grant, 2024 · $60k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Operating as an integral part of the nyc health + hospitals ("h+h"), formerly the new york city health and hospitals corporation. nyda will further h+h's tax-exempt charitable, scientific, and educational purposes by enhancing the…
Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…
The organization provides peer reviewed scientific research and education in the field of biological dentistry.
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
See schedule oto serve the public by:- assuring the qualifications of health care professionals- providing primary-source verification of credentials of health careprofessionals, as they serve throughout the world- supporting international…
Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…
To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.
The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.
To represent the interests of dermatologists and their patients. to influence and be a credible resource for public and private entities related to all policies and regulations that have the potential to affect the delivery of dermatologic…
The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Advancing, promoting and preserving the specialty of oral and maxillofacial surgery as well as the skills and professionalism of aaoms members to ensure patient access to safe and effective care.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Network for Oral Health Access and the most unlike its peers is Career Design in Dentistry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
131 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 131 of the 191 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NATIONAL DENTAL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds HEART TO HEART INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds ALPHA OMEGA INTERNATIONAL DENTAL FRATERNITY ↗
- Who funds NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SANTA FE GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds ALPHA OMEGA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds The Children's Health Fund ↗
- Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
- Who funds NORTHWELL HEALTHCARE INC ↗
- Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
- Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MEDSHARE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FREE AND CHARITABLE CLINICS INC ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL SERVICE VOLUNTEERS OF NASSAU INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds HISPANIC COUNSELING CENTER ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds THE VISCARDI CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF THE PEOPLE ↗
- Who funds LOCAL START DENTAL INC ↗
- Who funds ESPOIR YOUTH PROGRAMS INC ↗
- Who funds THE ARNOLD GOLD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Professional Baseball Athletic Trainers Society ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR DENTAL RESEARCH ↗
- Who funds BENEVOLENT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds STONY BROOK FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL COLLEGE OF DENTISTS USA SECTION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY USA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
- Who funds New York University ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Delta Dental Community Care Foundation · CareQuest Institute for Oral Health Inc · Carequest Foundation Inc · Direct Relief · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · American Dental Association · American Cancer Society Inc · Delta Dental Fund · Td Charitable Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Peoples United Community Foundation · Americares Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Henry Schein Cares Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Jhpiego Corporation — 65% of income from government
- Center for Medicare Advocacy Inc — 63% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- New Jersey Chapter American Academy of Pediatrics Inc — 24% of income from government
- Medstar Health Inc — 23% of income from government
- Florida Association of Community Health Centers Inc — 17% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- National Association of Community Health Centers Inc — 12% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Henry Schein Cares Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Henry Schein Cares Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.