· Private foundation
Harman Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k43 grants · $114k
- $10k–50k80 grants · $1.9M
- $50k–250k2 grants · $192k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SHAKESPEARE THEATRE CO | $100,000 |
| SPUR LOCAL | $92,000 |
| THE BELL | $45,000 |
| HETRICK-MARTIN INSTITUTE | $40,000 |
| ARAB-AMERICAN FMLY SUPPRT CTR | $40,000 |
| CITYTUTOR | $40,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $40,000 |
| YEAR UP | $40,000 |
| NEW FUTURES | $35,000 |
| COMM IN SCHOOLS OF WA DC | $35,000 |
| INNER-CITY ARTS | $35,000 |
| LIFE PIECES TO MASTERPIECES | $35,000 |
| ASPEN INSTITUTE | $35,000 |
| LINCOLN CENTER THEATER | $35,000 |
| BARUCH COLLEGE FUND | $35,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $742k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.
133 repeat relationships — 82 still active in FY2024, 51 since wound down; 39 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $627k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TSTHE SHAKESPEARE THEATRE4× · 2020–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +53%
- SLSPUR LOCAL INC4× · 2020–2024 · $309k · revenue +56%
- IAINNER-CITY ARTS5× · 2020–2024 · $259k · revenue +44%
Funded once
- CFCATALOGUE FOR PHILANTHROPY GREATR WA DCone grant, 2021 · $98k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $53k
- GWGREATER WA COMMNTY FOUNDATION-ARTS FORWARD FNDone grant, 2021 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…
The opportunity network ignites the drive, curiosity, and agency of underrepresented students on their paths to and through college and into thriving careers, powered by our commitment to access and community.
The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.
The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.
As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
School in the square ("s2") engages, educates and empowers adolescents to respond mindfully and creatively to life's opportunities and challenges. s2 is a place where students, families and educators are seen, heard, and inspired and where…
City year helps students and schools succeed, while preparing the next generation of civically engaged leaders who can work across lines of difference. partnering with teachers, teams of city year americorps members cultivate learning…
The manhattan institute is a community of scholars, journalists, activists, and civic leaders dedicated to advancing opportunity, individual liberty, and the rule of law in america and its great cities.
Council for court excellence's (cce's) mission is to bring people together to conduct research, educate, and advocate to make d.c.'s unique legal systems more just, equitable, and accountable to the community.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Accelerate Change Inc and the most unlike its peers is Medfield Food Cupboard. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
179 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 179 of the 265 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE SHAKESPEARE THEATRE ↗
- Who funds SPUR LOCAL INC ↗
- Who funds INNER-CITY ARTS ↗
- Who funds THE HETRICK-MARTIN INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds YEAR UP INC ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds MOTT HAVEN ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds THE DOOR - A CENTER OF ALTERNATIVES INC ↗
- Who funds LIFE PIECES TO MASTERPIECES ↗
- Who funds THE ARAB-AMERICAN FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds THE DREAMYARD PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds THE VIVIAN BEAUMONT THEATERINC D/B/A LINCOLN CENTER THEATER ↗
- Who funds GIRLS WRITE NOW INC ↗
- Who funds HORTON'S KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds LEGAL OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds ACCESS INC ↗
- Who funds STEM FROM DANCE INC ↗
- Who funds THE BARUCH COLLEGE FUND ↗
- Who funds YOUTH COMMUNICATION NY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds DC YOUTH ORCHESTRA PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds CITYSCHOOLS COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds SITAR ARTS CENTER ↗
- Who funds ONE WORLD EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds 826DC INC ↗
- Who funds RAW ART WORKS INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF THE NATION'S CAPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds MULTICULTURAL CAREER INTERN PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds The Knowledge House Fellowship Inc ↗
- Who funds TECH KIDS UNLIMITED INC ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds EDUCATORS FOR EXCELLENCE INC ↗
- Who funds HIGHER ACHIEVEMENT PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds COLLEGIATE DIRECTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds Project STEP Inc ↗
- Who funds KID POWER INC ↗
- Who funds MONUMENT ACADEMY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Greater Washington Community Foundation · Philip L Graham Fund co Graham Holdings Company · Dimick Foundation John M Lynham Jr Trustee · United Way of the National Capital Area · John Edward Fowler Memorial Foundation · Clark-Winchcole Foundation · Nora Roberts Foundation · Hattie M Strong Foundation · Max & Victoria Dreyfus Foundation Inc · Jack Kent Cooke Foundation · Humanities Council of Washington DC
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Harman Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- World Arts Focus — 100% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Casaprince George's County Inc — 17% of income from government
- Imagination Stage Inc — 13% of income from government
- Raw Art Works Inc — 7% of income from government
- Medfield Food Cupboard — 6% of income from government
- Zumix Inc — 5% of income from government
- Silk Road Project Inc — 4% of income from government
- Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
- Action Youth Media Inc — 3% of income from government
- The Theater Offensive Inc — 2% of income from government
- The Trustees of Reservations — 2% of income from government
- Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc — 1% of income from government
- Manna Food Center Inc — 1% of income from government
- Year Up Inc — 0% of income from government
- Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Harman Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Harman Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.