· Private foundation
Hanuman Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FRENCH BROAD RIVER ACADEMY | $2,500 |
| KUYI 881 HOPI FOUNDATION | $2,008 |
| FOREST STEWARDS GUILD | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| KITCHEN ANGELS | $1,500 |
| SAINT THOMAS CATHOLIC PARISH | $1,500 |
| WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN | $1,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,500 |
| TEAM RUBICON | $1,500 |
| THE FOOD DEPOT | $1,500 |
| RIO GRANDE FOOD PROJECT | $1,500 |
| DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS | $1,008 |
| TIBETAN ASSOCIATION OF SANTA FE | $1,008 |
| T1 INTERNATIONAL | $1,008 |
| NM WILD | $1,008 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
52 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2025, 32 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC6× · 2020–2025 · $21k · revenue +21%
THE FOOD DEPOT6× · 2019–2025 · $9k · revenue +51%
MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC6× · 2020–2025 · $9k · revenue +39%
Funded once
- THTHE HOPI FOUNDATION LOMASUMI'NANGWTUKWSIWMANIone grant, 2020 · $6k · revenue -59%
- HPHermits Peak Watershed Allianceone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +10%
- IRInternational Rescue Committee INCone grant, 2022 · $4k · revenue -4%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The water protector legal collective is an indigenous-led legal nonprofit that provides support and advocacy for indigenous peoples and original nations, the earth, and climate justice movements.
Sovereign Energy builds the individual and collective power of Southwest Pueblos and Tribes to lead the way toward a just, interdependent, and sustainable energy future.
Bold futures nm leads policy change, research, place-based organizing, and culture shift by and for women and people of color in new mexico. bold futures nm centers the lived experiences and expertise of those most impacted by an issue,…
Northern new mexicans protecting land water and rights strives to lessen the stress of neighborhood tensions due to lack of information and fair representation. by providing an organization whose main goal is to unite and empower the…
Nature and culture international conserves biologically diverse landscapes in latin america, in concert with local cultures, for the well-being of the planet.
Cuenca los ojos works to preserve and restore the biodiversity of the us/mexican borderlands through land protection, habitat restoration and wildlife reintroduction.
Educate the public on forest conservation issues in New Mexico
New mexico wild action fund is dedicated to advancing policies that protect new mexico's wilderness, wildlife, and water.
Empowering indigenous communities to reconnect with, regenerate, and conserve their sacred peyote medicine.
Nuestra tierra conservation project's core mission is to ensure that historically and deliberately excluded communities have access to the outdoors and that our people, history and values are authentically reflected in public land and…
To address climate change by investing in New Mexico projects that reduce greenhouse gas emissions climate impacts and energy cost burdens prioritizing underserved communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Mexico Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Paul Basch Memorial Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
85 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 85 of the 160 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds LAS VEGAS NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUN ↗
- Who funds TEAM RUBICON INC ↗
- Who funds THE FOOD DEPOT ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds TIBETAN ASSOCIATION OF SANTA FE INC ↗
- Who funds ROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds KITCHEN ANGELS INC ↗
- Who funds THE HOPI FOUNDATION LOMASUMI'NANGWTUKWSIWMANI ↗
- Who funds Hermits Peak Watershed Alliance ↗
- Who funds NATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND INC ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds RIO GRANDE FOOD PROJECT ↗
- Who funds SITE SANTA FE ↗
- Who funds TEWA WOMEN UNITED ↗
- Who funds FIRST NATIONS DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds United Help Ukraine Inc ↗
- Who funds PINE RIDGE GIRLS SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO LEGAL AID INC ↗
- Who funds THE KESHI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FRENCH BROAD RIVER ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds NONPROFIT LEGAL SERVICES OF UTAH ↗
- Who funds VETERANS YOGA PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds SANTA FE CONSERVATION TRUST ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST LEARNING CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds SCOTT'S HOUSE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · Marshall L and Perrine D McCune Charitable Foundation Inc · Albuquerque Community Foundation · Con Alma Health Foundation Inc · New Mexico Community Foundation · Thornburg Foundation · Anchorum St Vincent · Common Counsel Foundation · Pnm Tnmp Foundation · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation · Novo Foundation · Brindle Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hanuman Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Hanuman Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Hanuman Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.