Skip to content
Hanover Rotary Charities Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Hanover Rotary Charities Inc

Fundraising to support scholarships, community improvements, and non-profit organizations

$165k
Granted FY2023
5
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$82k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2023.

Human Services$308kYouth Development$151kHealth$14kInternational$12kPublic Benefit$8kHousing & Shelter$7kEnvironment$5kFood & Nutrition$3kOther$0
02FY2023 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $157,929, the rows itemized in this filing. The $164,619 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $6,690 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k2 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $67k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $82k
$28,127
Median grant
2
States reached
$102k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SPECIAL NEEDS SUPPORT CENTER$82,232
GRANTS UNDER 3500$38,570
LISTEN COMMUNITY SERVICES$28,127
PLYMOUTH ROTARY FOUNDATION$5,000
SECOND GROWTH INC$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $308k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WISE: $130k → 10%SPECIAL NEEDS SUPPORT CENTER: $82k → 9%LISTEN COMMUNITY SERVICE: $30k → 10%LISTEN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $28k → 10%GRAFTON COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL: $20k → 10%LISTEN COMMUNITY SERVICE: $11k → 10%GRAFTON COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL: $3k → 10%WILLING HANDS: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

32%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$203k · 4 repeat orgs$425k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +62% since the first grant, against +48% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2023, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
13

Total granted

$203k
$337k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
+48%

Still filing today

75%
77%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $87k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’23
Human ServicesHealthPhilanthropyCrime & LegalInternationalHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LL
    LISTEN Lebanon in Service to Each Neighbor
    3× · 2019–2023 · $69k · revenue +62%
  • GC
    Grafton County Senior Citizens Council Inc
    2× · 2019–2020 · $23k · revenue +7%
  • SG
    Second Growth Inc
    2× · 2019–2023 · $8k · revenue +168%

Funded once

  • PT
    POSITIVE TRACKS INC
    one grant, 2020 · $143k · revenue +19%
  • WI
    WOMEN'S INFORMATION SERVICE (WISE) OF THE UPPER VALLEY INC
    one grant, 2019 · $130k · revenue +23%
  • GU
    GRANTS UNDER 2500
    one grant, 2019 · $22k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Health Strategies of New Hampshire Inc
Health
2
Addiction Recovery Coalition of New Hampshire

ARCNH community recovery center is a Peer-to-Peer recovery coaching program that is designed to provide those on the path to recovery with individualized care and support from those with personal experiences with SUDS

Health
3
Groundworks Collaborative Inc

Groundworks collaborative, inc. provides emergency shelter, housing assistance & a food shelf for homeless persons.

—
4
CityHope of New Hampshire

CityHope walks with individuals and families, empowering and equipping them with the necessary resources and skills needed to thrive in their communities. By providing support services to those experiencing financial hardships and housing…

Human Services
5
Southern New Hampshire Health System Inc

Southern New Hampshire Health is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve.

Health
6
Lakes Region Consumer Advisory Board

LRCABs mission is to provide peer support to those who are currently receiving or have received mental health services and to empower them to control their own lives and to influence the resources that affect their lives.

Health
7
Habitat for Humanity of the Kearsarge Sunapee Area Inc

To witness to and implement the Gospel of Jesus Christ in the towns of Andover, Bradford, Danbury, New London, Springfield, Sunapee, Sutton, Newbury, Wilmot and Newport located in the State of NH by working with economically disadvantaged…

—
8
Harbor Homes Inc

Harbor Care's mission is to provide vital services, including housing and healthcare to all in our communities needing assistance. Our vision is one where everyone gets to live safe, stable, and healthy lives, filled with purpose, respect…

Housing & Shelter
9
Upper Valley Habitat for Humanity Inc

UVHFHs mission is to build affordable, durable,safe, healthy, economical,and energy-efficient homes; strenghthen & enrich communities; & long-term hope, prosperity, health & the lives of families & individuals in the Upper Valley of VT &…

—
10
New Hampshire Children's Health Foundation
Health
11
White River Council on Aging

White River Council on Aging invites older adults in the Upper Valley to age well through food, friendship, participation, and purpose.

Human Services
12
Visiting Nurse & Community Health Inc

We are committed to providing the highest quality, compassionate home care to the patients entrusted to us. We are also steadfast in our pledge to be a responsive and innovative advocate for the communities we serve, focusing on health…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Listen Lebanon in Service to Each Neighbor; the most unlike its peers is Plymouth Rotary Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
15/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WOMEN'S INFORMATION SERVICE (WISE) OF THE UPPER VALLEY INC: $130,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S INFORMATION SERVICE (WISE) OF THE UPPER VALLEY …SPECIAL NEEDS SUPPORT CENTER OF THE UPPER VALLEY: $82,232 · Human ServicesSPECIAL NEEDS SUPPORT CENTER OF THE UPPER VALLEYLISTEN Lebanon in Service to Each Neighbor: $69,427 · Human ServicesLISTEN Lebanon in Service to Each NeighborGrafton County Senior Citizens Council Inc: $23,000 · Human ServicesGrafton County Senior Citizens Council Inc+2 more: $6,000 · Human ServicesPOSITIVE TRACKS INC: $142,732 · PhilanthropyPOSITIVE TRACKS INCGRANTS UNDER 3500: $102,933 · OtherGRANTS UNDER 3500GRANTS UNDER 2500: $22,070 · OtherGRANTS UNDER 2500TOWN OF HANOVER: $8,000 · OtherTOWN OF HANOVER+4 more: $14,000 · Other+4 moreTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $7,725 · InternationalAMERICANS CARING TEACHING SHARING INC: $4,500 · InternationalGood Neighbor Health Clinic Inc: $5,000 · HealthHeadrest Inc: $5,000 · HealthSecond Growth Inc: $8,000 · Crime & LegalPLYMOUTH ROTARY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Environment
Human Services$310,659Philanthropy$142,732Other$147,003International$12,225Health$10,000Crime & Legal$8,000Environment$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPOSITIVE TRACKS INC: $142,732 over 1y, 14% of budgetWOMEN'S INFORMATION SERVICE (WISE) OF THE UPPER VALLEY INC: $130,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetSPECIAL NEEDS SUPPORT CENTER OF THE UPPER VALLEY: $82,232 over 1y, 21% of budgetLISTEN Lebanon in Service to Each Neighbor: $69,427 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetGrafton County Senior Citizens Council Inc: $23,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSecond Growth Inc: $8,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $7,725 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGood Neighbor Health Clinic Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPLYMOUTH ROTARY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetAMERICANS CARING TEACHING SHARING INC: $4,500 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetWAYPOINT: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVER HOME REPAIR INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Hampshire Charita…The Couch Family Foun…Hypertherm Hope Found…Mascoma Bank Foundati…Mary Hitchcock Memori…Dartmouth-Hitchcock C…Claremont Savings Ban…Granite United WayLane & Elizabeth C Dw…Schon Family Foundati…The Vermont Community…Flora R and Isidor M …
New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH30.9× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · The Couch Family Foundation · Hypertherm Hope Foundation Inc · Mascoma Bank Foundation · Mary Hitchcock Memorial Hospital · Dartmouth-Hitchcock Clinic · Claremont Savings Bank Foundation · Granite United Way · Lane & Elizabeth C Dwinell Fdn · Schon Family Foundation · The Vermont Community Foundation · Flora R and Isidor M Stettenheim Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hanover Rotary Charities Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hanover Rotary Charities Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 17%
  • Hartford Community Coalition Inc: 61% of income from government
  • Willing Hands Enterprises Inc: 17% of income from government
  • Cover Home Repair Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Hanover Rotary Charities Inc?

Find your warmest path to Hanover Rotary Charities Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $68k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hanover Rotary Charities’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home