Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Hanover Rotary Charities Inc

Fundraising to support scholarships, community improvements, and non-profit organizations

$165k
Granted FY2023
5
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$82k
Largest
01What you fund
0188% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192023.

Human Services$308kYouth Development$151kHealth$14kInternational$12kPublic Benefit$8kHousing & Shelter$7kEnvironment$5kFood & Nutrition$3kOther$0
02FY2023 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 5 grants below total $157,929 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $164,619 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $6,690 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k2 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $67k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $82k
$28,127
Median grant
2
States reached
$102k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SPECIAL NEEDS SUPPORT CENTER$82,232
GRANTS UNDER 3500$38,570
LISTEN COMMUNITY SERVICES$28,127
PLYMOUTH ROTARY FOUNDATION$5,000
SECOND GROWTH INC$4,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–23, $308k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WISE: $130k → 10%SPECIAL NEEDS SUPPORT CENTER: $82k → 9%LISTEN COMMUNITY SERVICE: $30k → 10%LISTEN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $28k → 10%GRAFTON COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL: $20k → 10%LISTEN COMMUNITY SERVICE: $11k → 10%WILLING HANDS: $3k → 10%GRAFTON COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

32%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$203k · 4 repeat orgs$425k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +62% since the first grant, against +48% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2023, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
13

Total granted

$203k
$337k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
+48%

Still filing today

75%
77%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $87k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’23
Human ServicesHealthPhilanthropyCrime & LegalInternationalHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LL
    LISTEN Lebanon in Service to Each Neighbor
    3× · 2019–2023 · $69k · revenue +62%
  • GC
    Grafton County Senior Citizens Council Inc
    2× · 2019–2020 · $23k · revenue +7%
  • SG
    Second Growth Inc
    2× · 2019–2023 · $8k · revenue +168%

Funded once

  • PT
    POSITIVE TRACKS INC
    one grant, 2020 · $143k · revenue +19%
  • WI
    WOMEN'S INFORMATION SERVICE (WISE) OF THE UPPER VALLEY INC
    one grant, 2019 · $130k · revenue +23%
  • GU
    GRANTS UNDER 2500
    one grant, 2019 · $22k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Health Strategies of New Hampshire Inc
Health
2
Addiction Recovery Coalition of New Hampshire

ARCNH community recovery center is a Peer-to-Peer recovery coaching program that is designed to provide those on the path to recovery with individualized care and support from those with personal experiences with SUDS

Health
3
Groundworks Collaborative Inc

Groundworks collaborative, inc. provides emergency shelter, housing assistance & a food shelf for homeless persons.

4
CityHope of New Hampshire

CityHope walks with individuals and families, empowering and equipping them with the necessary resources and skills needed to thrive in their communities. By providing support services to those experiencing financial hardships and housing…

Human Services
5
Southern New Hampshire Health System Inc

Southern New Hampshire Health is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve.

Health
6
Lakes Region Consumer Advisory Board

LRCABs mission is to provide peer support to those who are currently receiving or have received mental health services and to empower them to control their own lives and to influence the resources that affect their lives.

Health
7
Habitat for Humanity of the Kearsarge Sunapee Area Inc

To witness to and implement the Gospel of Jesus Christ in the towns of Andover, Bradford, Danbury, New London, Springfield, Sunapee, Sutton, Newbury, Wilmot and Newport located in the State of NH by working with economically disadvantaged…

8
Harbor Homes Inc

Harbor Care's mission is to provide vital services, including housing and healthcare to all in our communities needing assistance. Our vision is one where everyone gets to live safe, stable, and healthy lives, filled with purpose, respect…

Housing & Shelter
9
Upper Valley Habitat for Humanity Inc

UVHFHs mission is to build affordable, durable,safe, healthy, economical,and energy-efficient homes; strenghthen & enrich communities; & long-term hope, prosperity, health & the lives of families & individuals in the Upper Valley of VT &…

10
New Hampshire Children's Health Foundation
Health
11
White River Council on Aging

White River Council on Aging invites older adults in the Upper Valley to age well through food, friendship, participation, and purpose.

Human Services
12
Visiting Nurse & Community Health Inc

We are committed to providing the highest quality, compassionate home care to the patients entrusted to us. We are also steadfast in our pledge to be a responsive and innovative advocate for the communities we serve, focusing on health…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Listen Lebanon in Service to Each Neighbor and the most unlike its peers is Plymouth Rotary Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
15/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WOMEN'S INFORMATION SERVICE (WISE) OF THE UPPER VALLEY INC — $130,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S INFORMATION SERVICE (WISE) OF THE UPPER VALLEY …SPECIAL NEEDS SUPPORT CENTER OF THE UPPER VALLEY — $82,232 · Human ServicesSPECIAL NEEDS SUPPORT CENTER OF THE UPPER VALLEYLISTEN Lebanon in Service to Each Neighbor — $69,427 · Human ServicesLISTEN Lebanon in Service to Each NeighborGrafton County Senior Citizens Council Inc — $23,000 · Human ServicesGrafton County Senior Citizens Council Inc+2 more — $6,000 · Human ServicesPOSITIVE TRACKS INC — $142,732 · PhilanthropyPOSITIVE TRACKS INCGRANTS UNDER 3500 — $102,933 · OtherGRANTS UNDER 3500GRANTS UNDER 2500 — $22,070 · OtherGRANTS UNDER 2500TOWN OF HANOVER — $8,000 · OtherTOWN OF HANOVER+4 more — $14,000 · Other+4 moreTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL — $7,725 · InternationalAMERICANS CARING TEACHING SHARING INC — $4,500 · InternationalHeadrest Inc — $5,000 · HealthGood Neighbor Health Clinic Inc — $5,000 · HealthSecond Growth Inc — $8,000 · Crime & LegalPLYMOUTH ROTARY FOUNDATION — $5,000 · Environment
Human Services$310,659Philanthropy$142,732Other$147,003International$12,225Health$10,000Crime & Legal$8,000Environment$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPOSITIVE TRACKS INC — $142,732 over 1y, 14% of budgetWOMEN'S INFORMATION SERVICE (WISE) OF THE UPPER VALLEY INC — $130,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetSPECIAL NEEDS SUPPORT CENTER OF THE UPPER VALLEY — $82,232 over 1y, 21% of budgetLISTEN Lebanon in Service to Each Neighbor — $69,427 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetGrafton County Senior Citizens Council Inc — $23,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSecond Growth Inc — $8,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL — $7,725 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGood Neighbor Health Clinic Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPLYMOUTH ROTARY FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetAMERICANS CARING TEACHING SHARING INC — $4,500 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetWAYPOINT — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVER HOME REPAIR INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH30.9× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · The Couch Family Foundation · Hypertherm Hope Foundation Inc · Mascoma Bank Foundation · Mary Hitchcock Memorial Hospital · Dartmouth-Hitchcock Clinic · Claremont Savings Bank Foundation · Granite United Way · Lane & Elizabeth C Dwinell Fdn · Schon Family Foundation · The Vermont Community Foundation · Flora R and Isidor M Stettenheim Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hanover Rotary Charities Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 17%
  • Hartford Community Coalition Inc61% of income from government
  • Willing Hands Enterprises Inc17% of income from government
  • Cover Home Repair Inc3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Hanover Rotary Charities Inc?

Find your warmest path to Hanover Rotary Charities Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $68k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph