· Private foundation
Flora R and Isidor M Stettenheim Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 54% of FLORA R AND ISIDOR M STETTENHEIM FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OMPRAKASH FOUNDATION | $7,500 |
| COMMON TABLE - BIRDHOUSE FARMERS MARKET | $5,000 |
| JAM - JUNCTION ARTS AND MEDIA | $4,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,000 |
| ACLU FOUNDATION OF VIRGINIA | $2,500 |
| ACLU FOUNDATION OF CALIFORNIA | $2,500 |
| MIGRANT JUSTICE | $2,500 |
| ACLU FOUNDATION OF VERMONT | $2,500 |
| ACLU FOUNDATION OF NEW HAMPSHIRE | $2,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF NORTHERN NEW ENGLAND | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| CLAREMONT SOUP KITCHEN & FOOD PANTRY | $2,000 |
| DARTMOUTH COLLEGE | $1,000 |
| AUDUBON SOCIETY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 73% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
57 repeat relationships — 40 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BFBirdhouse Farmers Market3× · 2020–2023 · $12k · revenue +146%
- GRGROUNDWORK RVA INC5× · 2020–2025 · $9k · revenue +177%
- UVUPPER VALLEY HAVEN7× · 2019–2025 · $8k · revenue +88%
Funded once
- TCTIDES CENTER - PALESTINIAN LEGALone grant, 2024 · $27k
- BUBOULEVARD UNITED METHODIST CHURCHone grant, 2024 · $5k
POMONA COLLEGEgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +106%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Vermont public informs, educates, and entertains through public service journalism and enlightening content rooted in vermont. our storytelling enriches lives and fosters community connection and understanding.
The Granite State News Collaborative is a statewide multimedia news collaborative that draws on and amplifies the strengths of its members to expand and add missing dimensions to coverage of issues of concern to the NH public as a whole,…
See schedule othe mission of the vermont council on world affairs is to promote awareness and understanding of the world and its people, places and cultures through education and engagement. the future of vermont depends upon the world…
Cvph medical center's mission is to provide quality health care for the north country region in upstate new york.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The ACLU of Vermont is a membership organization that protects civil liberties. Its work includes communication and advocacy with regards to rights guaranteed by the U.S. and State Constitutions.
Protect land along rivers, lakes and wetlands of vt; protect public access, wildlife habitat, scenic natural beauty, and ecological integrity.
Using the humanities, we connect with people across vermont to create just, vibrant, and resilient communities, and to inspire a lifelong love of learning.
Conducts and coordinates research of critical issues affecting vermonters. also conducts public opinion research.
Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…
Coalition that has come together to organize and advocate for justice for the people and places of vermonts northeast kingdom.
Serve as the governing organization for physicians who are employed to provide clinical services to affiliated member hospitals (the "affiliated hospitals") of the university of vermont health network ("uvm health network").
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Vermont Center for Ecostudies Inc and the most unlike its peers is Telling My Story. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
56 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 56 of the 83 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Birdhouse Farmers Market ↗
- Who funds OMPRAKASH INC ↗
- Who funds GROUNDWORK RVA INC ↗
- Who funds UPPER VALLEY HAVEN ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ↗
- Who funds COVER HOME REPAIR INC ↗
- Who funds LISTEN Lebanon in Service to Each Neighbor ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S INFORMATION SERVICE (WISE) OF THE UPPER VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds New Hampshire Charitable Foundation ↗
- Who funds CORPORATION OF HAVERFORD COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Good Neighbor Health Clinic Inc ↗
- Who funds WAYPOINT ↗
- Who funds Audubon Society of New Hampshire ↗
- Who funds Community Gallery Inc ↗
- Who funds TELLING MY STORY ↗
- Who funds THE FAMILY PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds Trustees of Dartmouth College ↗
- Who funds VOICES FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds RICHMOND REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM PROJECT ↗
- Who funds UPPER VALLEY LAND TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds THE VERMONT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR SAFER COMMUNITIES ↗
- Who funds Planned Parenthood of Northern New England Inc ↗
- Who funds BARNARD COLLEGE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Couch Family Foundation · New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Mascoma Bank Foundation · The Vermont Community Foundation · Hypertherm Hope Foundation Inc · The Help for People Foundation · Emily Landecker Foundation Inc · Ben & Jerry's Foundation Inc · Dartmouth-Hitchcock Clinic · Mary Hitchcock Memorial Hospital · The Greenspan Foundation 5223318 · Granite United Way
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Flora R and Isidor M Stettenheim Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- World Learning Inc — 39% of income from government
- Dismas of Vermont Inc — 39% of income from government
- The Family Place Inc — 38% of income from government
- Upper Valley Haven — 38% of income from government
- Willing Hands Enterprises Inc — 17% of income from government
- Clemmons Family Farm Inc — 9% of income from government
- Vital Communities Inc — 5% of income from government
- The Vermont Center for Ecostudies Inc — 4% of income from government
- Montshire Museum of Science Inc — 4% of income from government
- Upper Valley Trails Alliance — 3% of income from government
- Cover Home Repair Inc — 3% of income from government
- Planned Parenthood of Northern New England Inc — 2% of income from government
- Norwich Community Collaborative Inc — 1% of income from government
- Migrant Justice Inc — 0% of income from government
- The Vermont Community Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.