Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Glassybaby Foundation

TO SUPPORT ORGANIZATIONS THAT PROVIDE HOPE AND HEALING TO PEOPLE, ANIMALS AND THE PLANET.

$491k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$210k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.

Animals$757kHealth$480kEnvironment$369kFood & Nutrition$365kHuman Services$183kRecreation & Sports$128kPhilanthropy$121kCrime & Legal$119kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k19 grants · $57k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $105k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $330k
$5,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$6k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BFOUNDATION$210,000
PASADENA HUMANE SOCIETY$60,000
WESTSIDE FOOD BANK$60,000
SEATTLE SEAHAWKS WOMEN'S ASSOCIATION$38,940
SEATTLE AQUARIUM$25,000
HARLEM MOTHERS SAVE$20,878
HELEN WOODWARD ANIMAL CENTER$20,000
FRED HUTCH CANCER RESEARCH$6,850
Individual grant recipient$6,261
FREE2LUV$5,000
SHANE CENTER$5,000
FORGOTTEN DOGS RESCUE$5,000
MARIN HEALTH FOUNDATION$5,000
MISDB$5,000
CARCINOID CANCER FOUNDATION INC$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $186k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 43% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%MOTHERS GRACE: $25k → 11%PINKY SWEAR FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 11%BACKPACK FRIENDS: $5k → 10%CLOTHES TO KIDS RI: $5k → 14%NEW STORY INC: $60 → 13%LAUREN MCCLUSKEY FOUNDATION: $27 → 20%FREE INTERNATIONAL FBO NOND: $15k → 13%SUNFLOWER OF PEACE: $20k → 8%THE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN AND CHILDREN: $84 → 10%LADYBUG HOUSE: $3k → 9%LIVINGSTON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%BRIGID ALLIANCE: $10k → 17%BIRTHDAY DREAMS: $5k → 9%THE SOPHIA WAY: $6k → 9%LIVINGSTON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%SAFE CROSSINGS FOUNDATION: $5k → 9%FREE2LUV: $5k → 9%FREE2LUV: $5k → 9%CHILDREN OF THE VALLEY: $603 → 9%EVERGREEN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $675 → 9%BRIDGE RECEIVING CENTER: $5k → 9%SOUTHEAST SEATTLE SENIOR CENTER: $50k → 9%FORGOTTEN CHILDRENS FUND: $810 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
IN
OH
PA
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
VA
MD
AZ
TN
DC
HI
OK
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

44%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.4M · 36 repeat orgs$1.9M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.

36 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
169

Total granted

$1.4M
$1.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+2%

Still filing today

86%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $168k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthAnimalsHuman ServicesFood & NutritionEducationPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $150k · revenue +95%
  • SS
    SEATTLE SEAHAWKS WOMEN'S ASSOCIATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $105k · revenue +501% · 64% of their budget
  • CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2024 · $86k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • AH
    AMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $140k · revenue +30%
  • BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY
    one grant, 2024 · $140k · revenue 0%
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +36%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fsc I&P

Fsc i&p promotes environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world's forests. this mission aligns with the forest stewardship council (fsc), its network of offices, and other organizations.…

Philanthropy
2
Wildearth Guardians

Wildearth guardians works to protect and restore the wildlife, wild places, wild rivers, and health of the american west.

Unclassified
3
Alaska Whale Foundation

Alaska Whale Foundation is dedicated to marine mammal conservation through research monitoring and education.

Environment
4
Northwest Sarcoma Foundation

We provide hope, education and support to sarcoma patients and their families in the pacific northwest while investing in research to improve cure rates for sarcomas.

Human Services
5
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
6
Coast Fork Willamette Watershed Council

The Coast Fork Willamette Watershed Council is a local nonprofit organization that strives to enhance and restore habitat for fish and wildlife our community and for future generations. Our Board of Directors consists of seven members with…

Environment
7
Donor Network West

Donor network west is the federally designated organ procurement organization serving northern california and northern nevada. the service area includes nearly 14 million people across 100,000 square miles. approximately 110,000 people are…

—
8
Washington Women's Foundation

Washington women's foundation is a strong and inclusive collective of informed women who together influence community transformation through individual and collective discovery, high-impact grant making and by listening to and respecting…

Philanthropy
9
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
10
Cascades Carnivore Project

Our mission is to study and restore carnivore populations at risk of extinction and the mountain ecosystems they call home through innovative science, strong partnerships and local community action.

Science & Tech
11
Nw Childrens Foundation

To end the intergenerational cycle of child abuse, neglect and trauma.

Crime & Legal
12
Washington Wild

Washington wild protects and restores wild lands and waters in washington state through advocacy, education and civic engagement.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Shelter for Abused Women & Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Lauren Mccluskey Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAnimal Rescue and ShelterCommunity FoundationsCancer Support ServicesFood Banks and PantriesSenior Support ServicesEquine Therapy ProgramsCommunity Food PantriesChristian Youth CampsIndependent K-12 SchoolsSchool District FoundationsLocal History MuseumsPregnancy Support ServicesSchool Parent OrganizationsDomestic Violence ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Community Arts CentersUnited Way AffiliatesLocal Food System Organizat…Community College Foundatio…Environmental Conservation …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr14%13%5–10yr19%31%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr13%20%35–55yr16%10%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%9%5–10yr19%29%10–20yr16%19%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr16%18%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%2/189
the rest of the field
13%
240,394/1,819,376

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

182 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 182 of the 223 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
23
Early backer (in before they grew)
180/182
Grantees still filing
96/182
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC — $150,000 · AnimalsWILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETW…AMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION — $140,000 · AnimalsAMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATIO…BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $140,000 · AnimalsBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIET…MAUI HUMANE SOCIETY — $86,600 · AnimalsMAUI HUMANE SOCIETYPASADENA HUMANE — $60,000 · AnimalsPASADENA HUMANETHE SEATTLE AQUARIUM SOCIETY — $50,000 · AnimalsTHE SEATTLE AQUARIUM SOCIE…WILD SALMON CENTER — $45,000 · AnimalsWILD SALMON CENTERSTAFFORD ANIMAL SHELTER — $30,000 · Animals+16 more — $100,343 · Animals+16 moreBFOUNDATION — $351,152 · OtherBFOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION — $81,108 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATIONWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $100,000 · OtherWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCHarlem Mothers Stop Another Violent End Inc — $79,238 · OtherHarlem Mothers Stop Another Violent End Inc+84 more — $711,976 · Other+84 moreGALLATIN VALLEY LAND TRUST — $102,500 · EnvironmentCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION — $86,050 · EnvironmentCLIMATE CONSERVATION DBA CENTER FOR LARGE LANDSCAPE CONSERVATION — $35,000 · EnvironmentGREATER YELLOWSTONE COALITION — $20,000 · EnvironmentCLIMATE JUSTICE ALLIANCE — $10,000 · Environment+3 more — $15,500 · EnvironmentSEATTLE SEAHAWKS WOMEN'S ASSOCIATION — $105,299 · PhilanthropyPARK COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $95,000 · PhilanthropyGREATER GALLATIN UNITED WAY INC — $15,000 · PhilanthropyFarms for Life — $15,000 · PhilanthropyCANCER CARTEL — $10,684 · Philanthropy+6 more — $26,038 · PhilanthropyCure Childhood Cancer Inc — $40,000 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $30,000 · HealthWorking Dogs For Conservation Found — $20,000 · HealthMARIN GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $20,000 · HealthOvarian Cancer Project Inc — $20,000 · HealthSTRONGHEARTS NATIVE HELPLINE INC — $15,000 · HealthNick Wilson Charitable Group — $12,290 · HealthFOUNDATION FOR WOMEN'S CANCER — $10,000 · HealthNURSE-FAMILY PARTNERSHIP — $10,000 · HealthThe Gretchen Weller Foundation — $10,000 · Health+24 more — $76,667 · HealthMAUI FOOD BANK INC — $85,000 · Food & NutritionWESTSIDE FOOD BANK — $60,000 · Food & NutritionLIVINGSTON FOOD PANTRY OF PARK COUNTY — $30,000 · Food & NutritionGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC — $20,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD FINDERS INC — $10,000 · Food & NutritionFAST BLACKFEET — $10,000 · Food & Nutrition+7 more — $41,000 · Food & NutritionSOUTHEAST SEATTLE SENIOR CENTER — $50,000 · Human ServicesTHE CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT — $33,249 · Human ServicesMOTHER'S GRACE — $25,000 · Human ServicesSUNFLOWER OF PEACE FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesLivingston Healthcare Foundation — $15,000 · Human ServicesF R E E INTERNATIONAL INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesBIG LOVE CANCER CARE SERVICES — $15,000 · Human ServicesFREE2LUV INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC — $10,000 · Human Services+13 more — $53,088 · Human Services
Animals$801,943Other$1,323,474Environment$269,050Philanthropy$267,021Health$263,957Food & Nutrition$256,000Human Services$246,337

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC — $150,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION — $140,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $140,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSEATTLE SEAHAWKS WOMEN'S ASSOCIATION — $105,299 over 4y, 64% of budgetGALLATIN VALLEY LAND TRUST — $102,500 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARK COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $95,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetMAUI HUMANE SOCIETY — $86,600 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION — $86,050 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC — $85,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION — $81,108 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHarlem Mothers Stop Another Violent End Inc — $79,238 over 5y, 8.5% of budgetWESTSIDE FOOD BANK — $60,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE SEATTLE AQUARIUM SOCIETY — $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHEAST SEATTLE SENIOR CENTER — $50,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetWILD SALMON CENTER — $45,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFARM TO SCHOOL OF PARK COUNTY — $42,000 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetCure Childhood Cancer Inc — $40,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCLIMATE CONSERVATION DBA CENTER FOR LARGE LANDSCAPE CONSERVATION — $35,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT — $33,249 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetArts Corps — $30,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIVINGSTON FOOD PANTRY OF PARK COUNTY — $30,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetSTAFFORD ANIMAL SHELTER — $30,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY CONNECTIONS FOR YOUTH INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetLEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS EDUCATION FUND — $25,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMOTHER'S GRACE — $25,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetSeattle Children's Foundation — $21,262 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWorking Dogs For Conservation Found — $20,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSUNFLOWER OF PEACE FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIdaho Wildlife Federation — $20,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetGREATER YELLOWSTONE COALITION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARIN GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BROTHERHOOD SISTER SOL INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOvarian Cancer Project Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetBRIDGERCARE — $17,347 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM — $16,020 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTRONGHEARTS NATIVE HELPLINE INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGREATER GALLATIN UNITED WAY INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetASPEN-ABUSE SUPPORT & PREVENTION EDUCATION NETWORK — $15,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetDream of Wild Health — $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLivingston Healthcare Foundation — $15,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetFarms for Life — $15,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetMINNESOTA INDIAN WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER — $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetF R E E INTERNATIONAL INC — $15,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetBIG LOVE CANCER CARE SERVICES — $15,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Glassybaby White Ligh…The Norcliffe Foundat…Puget Sound Energy Fo…Seattle FoundationThe Arthur M Blank Fa…Dennis & Phyllis Wash…Park County Community…First Interstate Banc…The Kendeda FundSolid Rock Foundation…One Valley Community …The High Stakes Found…
Glassybaby White Light FundWA50.6× affinity24 shared granteesties to 7 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Glassybaby White Light Fund · The Norcliffe Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Seattle Foundation · The Arthur M Blank Family Foundation · Dennis & Phyllis Washington Foundation · Park County Community Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · The Kendeda Fund · Solid Rock Foundation Co Rosamond Stanton · One Valley Community Foundation · The High Stakes Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Glassybaby Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 110%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Lines for Life — 70% of income from government
  • Wild Salmon Center — 49% of income from government
  • Oregon Food Bank — 21% of income from government
  • Als Therapy Development Foundation Inc — 8% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
  • The Shelter for Abused Women & Children Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Chill Foundation — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
43report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Glassybaby Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Glassybaby Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 223 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines